Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(migrate): add transaction-mode flag for improved migration control #44

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

marianozunino
Copy link
Owner

@marianozunino marianozunino commented Oct 31, 2024

  • Introduced a new --transaction-mode flag for the migrate command.
  • This flag allows users to specify how migrations are executed, enabling options for running transactions per statement or per migration.

@marianozunino marianozunino changed the title feat: added transaction-mode flag for migrate command feat: added transaction-mode flag to migrate command Oct 31, 2024
@marianozunino marianozunino force-pushed the feat/transaction-mode branch 2 times, most recently from e4cd6ec to 038ad4b Compare October 31, 2024 17:54
- Introduced a new `--transaction-mode` flag for the `migrate` command.
- This flag allows users to specify how migrations are executed, enabling options for running transactions per statement or per migration.
@marianozunino marianozunino changed the title feat: added transaction-mode flag to migrate command feat(migrate): add transaction-mode flag for improved migration control Oct 31, 2024
@marianozunino marianozunino marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2024 18:19
@marianozunino marianozunino merged commit 989fe4d into master Oct 31, 2024
2 checks passed
@marianozunino marianozunino deleted the feat/transaction-mode branch October 31, 2024 18:19
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 4.2.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant