Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added live example for 'Adding Regions' doc #3561

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Added live example for 'Adding Regions' doc #3561

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

CharlyJazz
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

  • The live example shows a practical scenario where regions are added to the view depending on the model

Link to the issue: #3209

Add live example for 'Defining the Application Region'
@CharlyJazz CharlyJazz changed the title Added live example for 'Adding Region' doc Added live example for 'Adding Regions' doc Nov 29, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6bc9be9 on CharlyJazz:charlyjazz-patch into 78616e2 on marionettejs:master.

Copy link
Member

@scott-w scott-w left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty much looks OK to me - just changing the link to the JSFiddle.

Is there a reason for using Backbone.Router instead of Marionette.AppRouter?

@@ -233,6 +235,8 @@ myView.addRegions({
});
```

[Live example](http://jsfiddle.net/charlyjazz/gze5ykov/49/)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this need to be switched out for a marionettejs account URL?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've forked at http://jsfiddle.net/marionettejs/kjvzdyd6/ to use marionettejs account

@scott-w scott-w added the docs label Dec 4, 2017
@paulfalgout
Copy link
Member

@scott-w we'll have to swap out the link at merge.

As far as the router is concerned since AppRouter is being made an external component this is currently the easiest way to keep this from needing to be updated with v4. We certainly could change it to use the other lib at that time, but it also doesn't seem necessary.

@cusial
Copy link

cusial commented Dec 4, 2017 via email

@paulfalgout
Copy link
Member

@cusial to my knowledge this is something you need to do yourself. There should be an unsubscribe button on this PR and you can unwatch the library at the top of github. There's also an unsubscribe link in the email. But we don't have the ability to do this for you.

Copy link
Member

@scott-w scott-w left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@paulfalgout Fair enough, I'm happy with this as-is. If I get chance tomorrow and you're happy to 👍 it I can merge and fix the link tomorrow.

@CharlyJazz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Friends missing something to do here?

@blikblum
Copy link
Collaborator

@CharlyJazz after updating the last jsfiddle link i think is good to go

@blikblum blikblum closed this Jan 20, 2018
@blikblum blikblum reopened this Jan 20, 2018
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6bc9be9 on CharlyJazz:charlyjazz-patch into 78616e2 on marionettejs:master.

@paulfalgout
Copy link
Member

I'll get this in after #3561 lands

@CharlyJazz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hahaha what?

@CharlyJazz
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's been a long time since I have a beard 🎉

@paulfalgout
Copy link
Member

Added to next

@paulfalgout paulfalgout closed this Jun 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants