Protect angles in helices when adjacent to prolines (2nd try) #675
+28
−27
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Re-submitting this PR because its original incarnation (#673) was mistakenly closed too early. See the discussion there.
The current implementation weakens helical BB-BB-BB angles whenever a Pro is present, which makes sense.
The helical dihedrals, however, are never switched off (shouldn't they be?). Helix BB-BB-BB angles centered on Pro are, therefore, protected by type 10 angles from reaching 180 deg.
Angles involving adjacent residues, however, are problematic because they are also weakened, but not protected by type 10 potentials. This PR fixes that.
Fixes #674.