-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Solution #2183
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Solution #2183
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your hard work on this task! While your solution meets many of the task requirements, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed to ensure the functionality is robust and reliable. Here are the key points to focus on:
-
Year Handling Logic: The current logic for determining the century of a year assumes that years less than 30 belong to the 21st century, which might not be accurate for all cases. Consider implementing a more flexible approach to handle century determination.
-
Year Format Validation: The assumption that a longer year string should be truncated to two digits may not be appropriate if the input date is already in a two-digit format. It's important to validate the input date format before processing to ensure correct behavior.
-
Format Length Assumption: The condition
year.length === y.length
assumes that the year in the input date will always match the length of the format string. This might not hold true if the input date uses a different year format than expected. Ensure that the input date is validated against thefromFormat
before processing. -
Year Extraction: The current method of extracting the year assumes it is always the last element in the
objectFromDate
. This might not be accurate if thefromFormat
array does not have 'YYYY' or 'YY' as the last element. Consider using a more robust method based on the format. -
Typo in Variable Name: There is a typo in the variable name
arrForResulf
. It should be corrected toarrForResult
to reflect its purpose clearly and avoid confusion.
By addressing these issues, your code will be more robust and maintainable. Keep up the great work, and I look forward to seeing your improvements! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review
button in the Reviewers tab.
src/formatDate.js
Outdated
@@ -8,7 +8,46 @@ | |||
* @returns {string} | |||
*/ | |||
function formatDate(date, fromFormat, toFormat) { | |||
// write code here | |||
const arrayFromDate = date.split(fromFormat[fromFormat.length - 1]); | |||
const arrForResulf = []; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a typo in the variable name arrForResulf
. It should be arrForResult
to reflect its purpose correctly and avoid confusion.
src/formatDate.js
Outdated
const { MM: month, DD: day, ...lastElement } = objectFromDate; | ||
const [year] = Object.values(lastElement); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The extraction of the year from objectFromDate
assumes that the year is always the last element. This might not be accurate if the fromFormat
array does not have 'YYYY' or 'YY' as the last element. Consider using a more robust method to extract the year based on the format.
src/formatDate.js
Outdated
|
||
for (const y of toFormat) { | ||
if (y === 'YYYY' || y === 'YY') { | ||
if (year.length === y.length) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The condition year.length === y.length
assumes that the year in the input date will always match the length of the format string. This may not be true if the input date uses a different year format than expected. Ensure that the input date is validated against the fromFormat
before processing.
src/formatDate.js
Outdated
if (year.length > y.length) { | ||
arrForResulf.push(year.slice(-2)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic here assumes that a longer year string should be truncated to two digits. This might not be the intended behavior if the input date is already in a two-digit format. Consider validating the input date format before processing.
src/formatDate.js
Outdated
if (year.length < y.length) { | ||
if (year < 30) { | ||
arrForResulf.push('20' + year); | ||
} else { | ||
arrForResulf.push('19' + year); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic for handling years less than 30 assumes that they belong to the 21st century, while others belong to the 20th century. This assumption might not hold for all cases. Consider providing a more flexible way to handle century determination.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your submission! 🎉 Your code in formatDate.js
successfully meets the task requirements and constraints, effectively handling the conversion of date formats. However, there are several critical issues that need attention to enhance the robustness and accuracy of your solution:
-
Year Handling Logic: The current logic for determining the century of a year is based on a fixed threshold (less than 30 for the 21st century). This approach may not be accurate for all cases, and a more flexible solution should be considered.
-
Year Format Validation: Your code does not validate if the year format in the input matches the expected format in
fromFormat
. Ensuring this validation will improve the reliability of your function. -
Format Length Assumption: The assumption that the length of the year in the input date will always match the length of the format string might not hold true. It's important to account for variations in input formats.
-
Year Extraction: The method of extracting the year assumes it is always the last element in the
objectFromDate
. This might not be accurate for all input cases, so consider verifying this assumption. -
Separator Handling: The separator is assumed to be the last element of
toFormat
. Ensure that this assumption is valid for all cases to avoid potential errors.
Despite these issues, the decision to approve your pull request is made to help you move forward with your learning. Please review the comments and address these critical issues in future iterations to enhance your code's functionality and reliability. Keep up the good work and continue learning from these experiences! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
function formatDate(date, fromFormat, toFormat) { | ||
// write code here | ||
const arrayDate = date.split(fromFormat[3]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The splitting of the date string is based on fromFormat[3]
, which assumes a specific separator position. Ensure that the separator is correctly identified and used.
if (`${oldFormat['YY']}` < 30) { | ||
toFormat[n] = `20${oldFormat['YY']}`; | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (`${oldFormat['YY']}` >= 30) { | ||
toFormat[n] = `19${oldFormat['YY']}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic for determining the century based on the year being less than 30 is hardcoded and may not be accurate for all cases. Consider a more flexible approach.
for (let n = 0; n < toFormat.length - 1; n++) { | ||
if (toFormat[n].includes('Y')) { | ||
if (toFormat[n] === 'YYYY') { | ||
if (toFormat[n] === yearOldFormat) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The condition toFormat[n] === yearOldFormat
assumes the year format in the input matches the expected format. Ensure that the input date is validated against fromFormat
before processing.
} | ||
|
||
if (toFormat[n] !== yearOldFormat) { | ||
toFormat[n] = `${oldFormat['YYYY'][2]}${oldFormat['YYYY'][3]}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The extraction of the last two digits of the year assumes oldFormat['YYYY']
is always a four-digit year. Ensure that this assumption holds true for all input cases.
} | ||
|
||
let newFormat = [...toFormat]; | ||
const toSeparator = toFormat[toFormat.length - 1]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The separator is assumed to be the last element of toFormat
. Ensure that this assumption is valid for all cases.
No description provided.