Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong architecture binary ended up in arm64 #1380

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

djpolygon
Copy link
Contributor

Description

In the building of the arm64, the binary copy step was not included. This causes an issue where the user can download the current arm64 binary package and it will install. Bor will then fail to execute because it is the wrong binary.

Changes

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change that solves an issue)
  • [x ] Hotfix (change that solves an urgent issue, and requires immediate attention)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (change that is not backwards-compatible and/or changes current functionality)
  • Changes only for a subset of nodes

Breaking changes

Nodes audience

In case this PR includes changes that must be applied only to a subset of nodes, please specify how you handled it (e.g. by adding a flag with a default value...)

Checklist

  • [ x] I have added at least 2 reviewer or the whole pos-v1 team
  • [x ] I have added sufficient documentation in code
  • I will be resolving comments - if any - by pushing each fix in a separate commit and linking the commit hash in the comment reply
  • Created a task in Jira and informed the team for implementation in Erigon client (if applicable)
  • Includes RPC methods changes, and the Notion documentation has been updated

Cross repository changes

  • This PR requires changes to heimdall
    • In case link the PR here:
  • This PR requires changes to matic-cli
    • In case link the PR here:

Testing

  • I have added unit tests
  • I have added tests to CI
  • I have tested this code manually on local environment
  • I have tested this code manually on remote devnet using express-cli
  • I have tested this code manually on mumbai/amoy
  • I have created new e2e tests into express-cli

Manual tests

Please complete this section with the steps you performed if you ran manual tests for this functionality, otherwise delete it

Additional comments

Please post additional comments in this section if you have them, otherwise delete it

@djpolygon djpolygon requested a review from a team December 5, 2024 17:09
@marcello33 marcello33 merged commit d227610 into develop Dec 10, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants