-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Full node mode #13
Merged
Merged
Changes from 16 commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
210b324
Remove unused deps from `concurrency` crate
slowli 3794b92
Update `vise` revision
slowli 8db467a
Sketch optional consensus actor
slowli a69208c
Rework network actor configuration
slowli c23abbc
Refactor executor config / initialization
slowli 5613806
Move node binary from `executor` to `tools`
slowli 7d70c6c
Update executor-related scripts
slowli e8d9eba
Make storage traits more adequate
slowli b1ddad3
Sketch simple test for `Executor`
slowli 66c4eb5
Fix `SyncBlocks` actor interaction in executor
slowli ffd8739
Test external node interaction
slowli 24d7091
Update from upstream
slowli 34e4da3
Use `clap` to parse args in `executor` binary
slowli 8d610d6
Annotate `NodeConfig` message fields
slowli ae14d09
Remove support of env vars in `executor` binary
slowli 783bc30
Relax validator checks in `Executor`
slowli d8e8ff3
Check validator key in `network` crate
slowli 8d70eb2
Update from upstream
slowli 676d5ba
Merge branch 'main' into aov-bft-243-full-node-mode
slowli File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why "fallback"? It is supposed to be the primary source of state, with empty state being the fallback, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or you mean WithFallback? But then do we need that verbosity?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I've meant "store with fallback" (fallback being based on a
BlockStore
). Would something likeFullReplicaStateStore
work better?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess that would be better. But why not just ReplicaStateStore? The fallback is an implementation detail from the pov of this function. Perhaps we should make FallbackReplicaStateStore into a trait instead of ReplicaStateStore?