Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: TimeoutQC aggregation #220

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

fix: TimeoutQC aggregation #220

merged 8 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

pompon0
Copy link
Contributor

@pompon0 pompon0 commented Dec 11, 2024

Custom Ord implementation was causing timeout votes with different high qc (with the same view) to be deduplicated, which invalidated the aggregated signature. I've added a test for this case, and preemptively removed all custom Ord implementations on messages.

@pompon0 pompon0 requested a review from brunoffranca December 11, 2024 12:59
brunoffranca
brunoffranca previously approved these changes Dec 11, 2024
@pompon0 pompon0 requested a review from brunoffranca December 11, 2024 15:21
@pompon0 pompon0 merged commit 8a49824 into main Dec 11, 2024
6 checks passed
@pompon0 pompon0 deleted the gprusak-fix branch December 11, 2024 15:48
brunoffranca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.7.0](v0.6.0...v0.7.0)
(2024-12-16)


### Features

* Added tool to recover public keys from secret keys
([#224](#224))
([f1522f8](f1522f8))
* Added view timeout duration as a config parameter
([#222](#222))
([f07fcfa](f07fcfa))
* loadtest improvements
([#223](#223))
([69f11c7](69f11c7))


### Bug Fixes

* Fix high vote on informal spec
([#215](#215))
([c586f85](c586f85))
* TimeoutQC aggregation
([#220](#220))
([8a49824](8a49824))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: zksync-era-bot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants