Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove rand suffix in test job name #417

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 4, 2023

Conversation

mustdiechik
Copy link
Contributor

Also added possibility to add additional
annotations for test job.


It is bad practice to use random prefix\suffix in name of resources.

  • helm template is always different, it is pain for linters
  • it is convenient to search resource by name when use kustomize.

Also added possibility to add additional annotations, for example it is useful when use ArgoCD.

@mattermost-build
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @mustdiechik,

Thanks for your pull request! A Core Committer will review your pull request soon. For code contributions, you can learn more about the review process here.

Also added possibility to add additional
annotations for test job.
@spirosoik spirosoik self-requested a review September 6, 2023 06:12
@spirosoik spirosoik added Enhancement New feature or request 1: Dev Review Requires review by a core commiter labels Sep 6, 2023
Copy link
Member

@spirosoik spirosoik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution


## Additional annotations for test job

testJob:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am wondering if we need to this as an extra option. Why not just use the same value we already have extraPodAnnotations

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mustdiechik mustdiechik Sep 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, we need. Because to manage job with ArgoCD for example, we need its own job annotations. Helm`s hook annotations will not work.
https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user-guide/resource_hooks/

Also if we need to redeploy job for each "apply", we may to add some annotation with {{ rand }} value. (The same behavior as with rand suffix in name.)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I am aware for the argo resource hooks etc. Though we already have extraPodAnnotations in values.yaml what if we just use this in the test helm template so we have one value vs creating test only values.

Copy link
Member

@spirosoik spirosoik Sep 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In practice we could do this:

{{- with .Values.extraPodAnnotations}}

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mustdiechik mustdiechik Sep 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think, nobody will want to add hook`s annotations that are necessary for JOB to POD.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you elaborate a bit more? I think having one value for annotations and just re-use will help us to be DRY.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The job should be run after POD was created or updated. When to run job I can managed via it`s annotation.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@spirosoik
Copy link
Member

@stylianosrigas could you please have a look too here?

Copy link
Contributor

@stylianosrigas stylianosrigas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mustdiechik LGTM thanks a lot for your contribution 🚀

@stylianosrigas stylianosrigas merged commit aa4b593 into mattermost:master Oct 4, 2023
2 checks passed
@mustdiechik mustdiechik deleted the test-job branch October 4, 2023 07:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1: Dev Review Requires review by a core commiter Enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants