-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove rand suffix in test job name #417
Conversation
Hello @mustdiechik, Thanks for your pull request! A Core Committer will review your pull request soon. For code contributions, you can learn more about the review process here. |
a5b5021
to
61b97ff
Compare
Also added possibility to add additional annotations for test job.
61b97ff
to
8f5c0b0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the contribution
|
||
## Additional annotations for test job | ||
|
||
testJob: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am wondering if we need to this as an extra option. Why not just use the same value we already have extraPodAnnotations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, we need. Because to manage job with ArgoCD for example, we need its own job annotations. Helm`s hook annotations will not work.
https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user-guide/resource_hooks/
Also if we need to redeploy job for each "apply", we may to add some annotation with {{ rand }} value. (The same behavior as with rand suffix in name.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I am aware for the argo resource hooks etc. Though we already have extraPodAnnotations
in values.yaml
what if we just use this in the test helm template so we have one value vs creating test only values.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In practice we could do this:
{{- with .Values.extraPodAnnotations}}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think, nobody will want to add hook`s annotations that are necessary for JOB to POD.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you elaborate a bit more? I think having one value for annotations and just re-use will help us to be DRY.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The job should be run after POD was created or updated. When to run job I can managed via it`s annotation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@spirosoik up
@stylianosrigas could you please have a look too here? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mustdiechik LGTM thanks a lot for your contribution 🚀
Also added possibility to add additional
annotations for test job.
It is bad practice to use random prefix\suffix in name of resources.
Also added possibility to add additional annotations, for example it is useful when use ArgoCD.