Add sidebar to all Glossary pages

[leon-win]

What is the new suggestion?

I recently noticed that many Glossary pages were missing a sidebar with a list of terms.
Examples of pages that do not have a sidebar:
https://developer.mozilla.org/es/docs/Glossary/Abstraction
https://developer.mozilla.org/ja/docs/Glossary/Abstraction
https://developer.mozilla.org/ko/docs/Glossary/Accessible_name
https://developer.mozilla.org/pt-BR/docs/Glossary/Abstraction

I already fixed it for ru locale (#16863).
And I think it will be useful to do this in other locales:

• es ([es]: add sidebar to all Glossary pages #16943)
• ja ([ja] add sidebar to Glossary pages (part 1) #17031, [ja] add sidebar to Glossary pages (part 2) #17032, [ja] add sidebar to Glossary pages (part 3) #17033, [ja] add sidebar to Glossary pages (part 4) #17034, [ja] add sidebar to Glossary pages (part 5) #17035, [ja] add sidebar to Glossary pages (part 6) #17036)
• ko ([ko]: add sidebar to all Glossary pages #16970)
• pt-BR ([pt-br]: add sidebar to all Glossary pages #16986)

Why is it important or useful?

Sidebar is useful for navigation in Glossary, so this change will improve user experience.

Other supporting information

Initial works was in #16848.

To add a sidebar we need to do the following on each page (using the Spanish locale as an example):

1. add a {{GlossarySidebar}} macro at the beginning of the page
2. remove {{MDNSidebar}} macro if present
3. remove {{QuickLinksWithSubpages("/es/docs/Glossary")}} macro if present
4. remove {{ListSubpagesForSidebar("/es/docs/Glossary", 1)}} macro if present
5. replace such code blocks:

<section id="Quick_links">
 <ol>
  <li><a href="/es/docs/Glossary">Glossary</a>
   <ol>
    <li>{{Glossary("Accessibility")}}</li>
    <li>{{Glossary("ARIA")}}</li>
   </ol>
  </li>
 </ol>
</section>

with regular markup with the heading "See also":

## Véase también

- [Glosario de MDN Web Docs](/es/docs/Glossary)
  - {{Glossary("Accessibility")}}
  - {{Glossary("ARIA")}}

[leon-win]

This issues has become closed, although in fact it has not yet been completed.
Perhaps this is due to the fact that I closed #16979. But I did this at the request of a @mfuji09 to break it into several parts (#17031, #17032, #17033, #17034, #17035, #17036).

Therefore, if anyone has the opportunity, please re-open this issue.