clean

.gitmodules

@@ -13062,3 +13062,12 @@
 [submodule "2024/05/28/neo4j"]
 	path = 2024/05/28/neo4j
 	url = https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j
+[submodule "2024/05/28/ot-node"]
+	path = 2024/05/28/ot-node
+	url = https://github.com/OriginTrail/ot-node
+[submodule "2024/05/28/ChatDKG"]
+	path = 2024/05/28/ChatDKG
+	url = https://github.com/OriginTrail/ChatDKG
+[submodule "2024/05/28/polygon-edge"]
+	path = 2024/05/28/polygon-edge
+	url = https://github.com/0xPolygon/polygon-edge

2024/05/29/notes-jmd.bbl

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# we can include the github docs in our bib
+\bibitem[libp2p(2022)]{libp2p-circuit-relay}
+libp2p.
+\newblock libp2p circuit relay.
+\newblock \url{https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/nat/circuit-relay/}, 2022.

2024/05/29/notes-jmd.org

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+* executable
+
+The connection between executable and understandable.
+
+The translation from human readable text
+to computer executable actions.
+
+The translation from to computer executable actions
+to human readable text.
+
+* libp2p deamon go.
+
+The petals hivemind project
+spawns the p2pd service.
+
+See these projects:
+
+./04/27/go-libp2p-daemon/
+./04/27/jvm-libp2p/
+./03/27/hivemind/hivemind/
+
+
+* How do the humanities create new knowledge?
+
+New Books Network: Chris Haufe, "Do the Humanities Create Knowledge?" (Cambridge UP, 2023)
+Starting from: 00:24:00
+Media file: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chtbl.com/track/1C3AGD/traffic.megaphone.fm/NBNK4055109581.mp3?updated=1716820376#t=1619
+
+** Consensus
+
+In science also in humanities especially in science these days.
+Because sometimes it's difficult to tell the difference between
+science or pseudo-science or anti-science in the end of the day, we need to
+rely on Community consensus.  You discuss this
+epistemically, like-minded Community generating knowledge in
+natural sciences. In a way, maybe not to that extennt qw have this sort of
+consensus but maybe it's not as rigorous as it is in
+science. So can we say in this way, does Humanitys function more or
+less the same way as science does.
+
+On a social level, there are a lot of similarities. 
+One one important factor for understanding the similarities is
+The knowledge that scientific consensus doesn't really work by like
+people voting or even like coming together and agreeing like this is
+what we're gonna Believe, or this is what, you know we're gonna adopt. I mean, that
+does happen. Um, but it's not the typical kind of Object of consensus does not arise to that status
+through a explicit discussion and vote.
+It's like a cultural Trend (meme), that just percolates up and,
+It's not just a fad in the way that any old cultural Trend might might arise
+Things only really percolate up to that level and the natural Sciences
+if they satisfy. A bunch of Important criteria for scientific knowledge.
+Okay, so, you know, it's not just anything, that's going to be able to rise to that level. Um,
+but when it does it does so and and I think very much the same fashion,
+it's highly uncoordinated, right? It's just individuals.
+It's something resonating with individuals, it's Satisfying
+the criteria that they, insist upon for their own work.
+
+Moving forward with it and broadly speaking, this is how things become Exemplars, right? How things
+Rise to a certain kind of Very general level of acceptance in the
+humanities.
+We're employing different criteria or it's like I don't care. How many decimal places You know, a a result in philosophy
+or you know, an argument in  literary criticism has.
+I have different criteria, you know that that I use to govern my acceptance
+or my interest in a result.
+
+But I do employ some criteria. I would assume, I inherited much of
+those criteria from my training and kind of my inclusion as a member
+of this discipline. It is just not an accident, when
+something, Some major work say in philosophy is published and gains
+very, very broad acceptance.
+It has done so because it resonates so powerfully with so many different members of Um, the
+community. And I mean, add it fundamentally that is what the
+process of scientific consensus looks like.
+
+**  Scientific knowledge is to science as canonical texts are to the humanities.
+
+There's this beautiful quote in your book.  This, this sentence that I
+really love :
+""scientific knowledge is to science as canonical texts are to the humanities.""
+
+Think of something like Newton's mechanics, contemporary quantum mechanics as a set of
+stable set of ideas that are not for the purpose of being believed by
+other scientists. But are there for the purpose of Generating New
+Pathways for inquiry that the current generation of scientists will move down.
+(note: this is the growing stock idea)
+
+That to me is what scientific knowledge is, It's a stock That
+Generates further inquiry.
+
+From my perspective, this is always the way in which canonical texts
+have functioned in the humanities, right?  They're not there as as A
+stock of ideas to be believed and accepted into one's heart.  rather,
+What they're there for is,to get Scholars to reflect on, what is
+important and this Arena and Frame new inquiries On the basis of those
+Reflections.
+
+On the basis of those kind of Norms of importance are value that, that
+they've inherited.  That are reflected or exemplified in those
+canonical works.  There's a lot of results in in the principia that
+are just not correct.  And the subsequent generations of Scholars did
+not accept and knew were wrong.  But they accepted The value of
+Newton's approach to the study of nature.  And, They were not going to
+give that up, no matter what I mean, even if, every result that Newton
+had published was wrong, That it didn't it wouldn't have mattered.
+
+I mean, it was just such a powerfully well organized.  Well-conceived,
+way to structure problems that, the specific claims that Newton makes.
+And that's why we're still using it.
+
+** Relections
+
+I think we can reflect this into memes, he does not mention
+memes directly, but he talks of the "stock" growing, this is the vine analogy,
+and we can consider it to be like scombinators representing
+memes in a continuation.
+
+He talks of the memeification, so we have a disciplined group of
+people with criteria for accepting knowledge.
+
+My thoughts on broad resonance remind me of spectral decomposition.
+We can think of different groups as holding values dear that resonate
+with each other. Those might holder of certain meme coins or memes, or be engaged
+with the certain behaviours or mimicry and the furtherance of those.
+
+My thoughts on broad resonance also lead me to the etomology
+of the word, sonos and hearning, and we can think of music
+as being made of many parts or frequencies that come together in harmony
+like music. this leads us back the the story of the muses, and the mnemosyne
+the mother of the muses who is cultural memory and how these timeless metaphors
+might resonate with the idea of conciousness itself.
+
+We can think of the transformers paper as being one such paper that changed
+how people think. See the 
+The TWIML AI Podcast (formerly This Week in Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence): Language Understanding and LLMs with Christopher Manning - #686
+Episode webpage: https://twimlai.com/podcast/twimlai/language-understanding-and-llms/
+
+
+
+* bibliography
+
+we can include the github docs in our bib
+
+
+
+
+
+
+