Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated the local trajectory module #22

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025
Merged

Conversation

eamousing
Copy link
Collaborator

Updated the local trajectory module

  • Added FORD style documentation
  • Removed unused function uEMEP_local_trajectory
  • Updated function names to be more descriptive
  • Minor code enhancements for improved readability
  • Reals no longer test on equality

@brucerd I need you to look through the descriptions of the input and output variables, as I am not 100% sure it is correct.

Testing

I have not written unit tests for this module even if it is highly relevant. The functions depends on several variables/parameters set in uemep_definitions. It was very difficult to set this up to allow the tests to run properly. We should consider having a default config file for testing. The code changes pass regression testing.

- Added FORD style documentation
- Removed unused function uEMEP_local_trajectory
- Updated function names to be more descriptive
- Minor code enhancements for improved readability
- Reals no longer test on equality
@eamousing eamousing added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 22, 2024
@eamousing eamousing self-assigned this Nov 22, 2024
@eamousing eamousing changed the title Rf/local trajectory Updated the local trajectory module Nov 22, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@brucerd brucerd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Time for lunch.

@eamousing eamousing merged commit 3364f27 into develop Jan 21, 2025
@eamousing eamousing deleted the rf/local_trajectory branch January 21, 2025 11:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants