Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] upgrade macOS_regular job to Python 3.9 (fixes #5569) #5570

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2022

Conversation

jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes blocking issue #5569.

Proposes upgrading the macOS_regular CI job from Python 3.7 to 3.9, to try to fix CI errors possibly related to conda-forge dropping support for Python 3.7.

Is this a breaking change for producing release artifacts?

I don't think so. The only artifact build from this task is the shared library for macOS, lib_lightgbm.dylib.

LightGBM/.ci/test.sh

Lines 259 to 261 in d8a6b88

if [[ $OS_NAME == "macos" ]]; then
cp $BUILD_DIRECTORY/lib_lightgbm.so $BUILD_ARTIFACTSTAGINGDIRECTORY/lib_lightgbm.dylib
else

And that shouldn't be affected by Python version, as we don't produce a shared library that links into any Python stuff.

@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from jmoralez November 3, 2022 14:57
@jameslamb jameslamb marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2022 15:10
@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from StrikerRUS as a code owner November 3, 2022 15:10
@jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

🤩 Thanks as always for the quick review @jmoralez !

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity since it was closed. To start a new related discussion, open a new issue at https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/issues including a reference to this.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 19, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants