Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

exempi: Update version to 2.6.5 #10796

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 3.0-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jykanase
Copy link
Contributor

@jykanase jykanase commented Oct 21, 2024

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

exempi: Update version to 2.6.5

Change Log

-SPECS-EXTENDED/exempi/exempi.signatures.json
-SPECS-EXTENDED/exempi/exempi.spec
-cgmanifest.json

Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology
  • Pipeline build id: xxxx

@jykanase jykanase requested review from a team as code owners October 21, 2024 09:18
Copy link
Contributor

@suresh-thelkar suresh-thelkar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code changes look good to me. Running buddy build and make sure that everthing is fine.

Version: 2.6.1
Release: 2%{?dist}
Version: 2.6.5
Release: 1%{?dist}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please add distribution and vendor tags.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added distribution and vendor tags.

@suresh-thelkar
Copy link
Contributor

Buddy build results also look good.

@reubeno reubeno added the specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED label Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants