Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upgraded lua-term to version 0.08 #11146

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 3.0-dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Upgraded lua-term to version 0.08 #11146

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

aninda-al
Copy link

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge
Summary

Upgraded lua-term to version 0.08

Change Log
  • modified: SPECS-EXTENDED/lua-term/lua-term.signatures.json
  • modified: SPECS-EXTENDED/lua-term/lua-term.spec
  • modified: cgmanifest.json
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • NA
Links to CVEs
  • NA
Test Methodology
  • local build

@aninda-al aninda-al requested review from a team as code owners November 19, 2024 18:04
@reubeno reubeno added the specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED label Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@aninda-al @reubeno