Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add docs for 1.49.0's new "chromium" option #33680

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

joshkel
Copy link
Contributor

@joshkel joshkel commented Nov 19, 2024

Add docs for 1.49.0's new "chromium" option.

Reword channel documentation - as someone unfamiliar with the differences in Playwright's use of Chromium versus Google Chrome, I found the 1.49.0 release notes confusing. This may help.

Update browsers.md list of channels to match params.md.

Reword channel documentation - as someone unfamiliar with the differences in Playwright's use of Chromium versus Google Chrome, I found the 1.49.0 release notes confusing. This may help.

Update browsers.md list of channels to match params.md.
@joshkel
Copy link
Contributor Author

joshkel commented Nov 19, 2024

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Resonance Systems, Inc."

Copy link
Contributor

Test results for "tests 1"

2 flaky ⚠️ [playwright-test] › ui-mode-test-setup.spec.ts:98:5 › should show errors in config @macos-latest-node18-1
⚠️ [chromium-library] › library/video.spec.ts:381:5 › screencast › should capture navigation @ubuntu-20.04-chromium-tip-of-tree

36951 passed, 650 skipped
✔️✔️✔️

Merge workflow run.

@dgozman dgozman changed the title Add docs for 1.49.0's new "chromium" option docs: add docs for 1.49.0's new "chromium" option Nov 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@dgozman dgozman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the great PR! Merging in.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants