Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ddls 392 Secrets KMS #1722

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

Ddls 392 Secrets KMS #1722

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

jamesrwarren
Copy link
Contributor

@jamesrwarren jamesrwarren commented Nov 6, 2024

Purpose

Initial PR to modify the secrets KMS

Fixes DDLS-392

Approach

Two parts. Part 1 brings in the kms key.

Part 2 will update the roles to be able to decrypt the secrets and add the keys to the secrets

Learning

NA

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have updated documentation (Confluence/ADR/tech debt doc) where relevant
  • I have added tests to prove my work
  • The product team have approved these changes
  • I have checked my work for potential security issues and refered to the OWASP top 10

Frontend

  • I have run an in-browser accessibility test (e.g. WAVE, Lighthouse)
  • There are no deprecated CSS classes noted in the profiler
  • Translations are used and the profiler doesn't identify any missing
  • Any links or buttons added are screen reader friendly and contextually complete
  • If adding GA events, I have updated or checked the existing category or label values

@jamesrwarren jamesrwarren changed the title Ddls 392 Ddls 392 Secrets KMS Nov 6, 2024
@jamesrwarren jamesrwarren marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 14:18
@jamesrwarren jamesrwarren requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2024 14:18
Gugandeep
Gugandeep previously approved these changes Nov 7, 2024
@jamesrwarren jamesrwarren merged commit ba0ec23 into main Nov 7, 2024
37 checks passed
@jamesrwarren jamesrwarren deleted the DDLS-392 branch November 7, 2024 17:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants