-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Eha #85
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
# Conflicts: # book/library.bib
# Conflicts: # book/_macros.tex
Signed-off-by: RaphaelS1 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed up to AJ for multistate
book/P1C5_eha.qmd
Outdated
$$ {#eq-ms-prodint} | ||
<!-- --> | ||
|
||
Finally, for practical purposes, we express the instantaneous transition probabilities $p_{\ell e}(u)$ in terms of increments of the cumulative hazard using, somewhat informally, the following relationships |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I got a bit lost here and below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Finished review!
The cumulative transition-specific hazards thereby follow as | ||
<!-- --> | ||
$$ | ||
H_{NA,\ell e}(\tau) = \sum_{k:t_{(k)}\leq \tau} h^d_{\ell e}(t_{(k)}) = \sum_{k:t_{(k)}\leq \tau}\frac{d_{\ell e,t_{(k)}}}{n_{\ell; t_{(k)}}}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Arguably you don't need the far RHS because it's just been stated in the equation above and by now readers will be very used to seeing this format (i.e., H = sum h = sum d/n)
book/P1C5_eha.qmd
Outdated
The second event (second row) was experienced at 373 days and the subject was then censored for the third event (third row) after 414 days. | ||
This notation is equivalent to a multi-state representation of the recurrent events process, where each event number represents a different state. | ||
In @fig-recurrent-events, right panel, this is refered to as "Clock forward" approach. | ||
For illustration, consider again the `prothr` data set (@tbl-ms-data-prothr), with possible transitions summarized in @fig-multi-state-prothr-states. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Slightly more lead-in to the example would be good. Kind of abruptly jumps at the moment
Signed-off-by: RaphaelS1 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Sonabend-Friend <[email protected]>
No description provided.