Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tools list for fmi-ls-bus landing page #198

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

bmenne-dspace
Copy link
Contributor

see #185

@bmenne-dspace bmenne-dspace self-assigned this Oct 15, 2024
@bmenne-dspace bmenne-dspace linked an issue Oct 15, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@bmenne-dspace
Copy link
Contributor Author

For a suggestion of a tools list within the fmi-ls-bus landing page see https://github.com/bmenne-dspace/fmi-ls-bus#tools

This list may not be complete and does not have to be ultimately reliable. At first it is a suggestion and after this it has to be checked by the tool vendors itself.

We can talk about this suggestion in one of the next FMI meetings.

@bmenne-dspace bmenne-dspace added the common Issue within the common part of the specification that is not directly related to a specific bus label Oct 15, 2024
@bmenne-dspace bmenne-dspace marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2024 16:37
@bmenne-dspace
Copy link
Contributor Author

@masoud-najafi, @klausschuch, @snps-ribbe: I updated the preview (see https://github.com/bmenne-dspace/fmi-ls-bus#tools) and have also adapted everything as discussed in the last FMI design meeting. I cannot fill in the requested new column "Remarks" for you. You also have to check whether the information is correct for your importer. I have tried to make sure it is correct, but I still cannot judge it completely. BTW: If there is too much content within the new column the table layout gets easily ugly. Maybe we need a solution for this too.

masoud-najafi and others added 2 commits November 5, 2024 19:01
Providing a set of FMUs for each feature along with connection scenarios to validate the tool would be beneficial. With such a test suite in place, it would also allow for other tools to be added and validated.
@bmenne-dspace
Copy link
Contributor Author

@klausschuch and @snps-ribbe can you also watch the whole thing?

@bmenne-dspace
Copy link
Contributor Author

@klausschuch can you check?

@bmenne-dspace
Copy link
Contributor Author

@snps-ribbe can you also check? Then we can merge that PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@snps-ribbe snps-ribbe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve the overview - especially the Silver capabilities.

@bmenne-dspace bmenne-dspace merged commit fea483b into main Nov 19, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
common Issue within the common part of the specification that is not directly related to a specific bus
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

list of simulator with LS-BUS support
4 participants