Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🧹 add more integration testing for sbom scanning #3295

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

chris-rock
Copy link
Member

This PR adds integration testing for the sbom subcommand. It scans various container distros to make sure everything works as expected.

NOTE: that the tests are not enabled as default yet since the container fetching makes the pipeline slow. We work on improvements to use recordings which will make that a super fast test.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 13, 2024

Test Results

2 739 tests  ±0   2 738 ✅ ±0   49s ⏱️ +4s
  186 suites ±0       1 💤 ±0 
    5 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 2ffaf09. ± Comparison against base commit 9220b11.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@chris-rock chris-rock force-pushed the chris-rock/sbom-testing branch from 1fed840 to 48f1d97 Compare February 13, 2024 22:29
@chris-rock chris-rock force-pushed the chris-rock/sbom-testing branch from 48f1d97 to 2ffaf09 Compare February 13, 2024 22:38
Copy link
Contributor

@vjeffrey vjeffrey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🌟 MORE TESTS! yay!

@chris-rock chris-rock merged commit 25da67d into main Feb 14, 2024
14 checks passed
@chris-rock chris-rock deleted the chris-rock/sbom-testing branch February 14, 2024 18:13
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 14, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants