Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOCSP-34584 Reasoning for request traffic limitations #638

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 1, 2023

Conversation

lindseymoore
Copy link
Collaborator

@lindseymoore lindseymoore commented Nov 30, 2023

Pull Request Info

Jira ticket: https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/DOCSP-34584
Staged changes:

Reminder Checklist

Before merging your PR, make sure to check a few things.

  • Describe your PR's changes in the Release Notes section
  • Create a Jira ticket for corresponding docs-realm updates, if any

Release Notes

  • Reference/Service Limitations: Add reasoning for request traffic limitations and ensure that app services can handle more requests than the set limits.

Review Guidelines

REVIEWING.md

Copy link
Collaborator

@cbullinger cbullinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

some non-blocking style suggestions

source/reference/service-limitations.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/reference/service-limitations.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/reference/service-limitations.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@lindseymoore lindseymoore merged commit aff668d into mongodb:master Dec 1, 2023
4 checks passed
@docs-builder-bot
Copy link

MongoCaleb pushed a commit to MongoCaleb/docs-app-services that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
* DOCSP-34584 Reasoning for request traffic limitations

* genre and small edit

* review comment edits
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants