-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
orderly_location_pull_packet() doesn't require location= specification #154
Comments
See https://mrc-ide.github.io/orderly2/reference/orderly_search_options.html for details - this is behaving as expected and as designed, and is perhaps something that you will also have to unlearn from orderly1. You have a series of remotes - most users will have zero or one. When pulling the default is to pull from all remotes; that is the query evaluated over the graph of packets contained everywhere. You can restrict this by using the The message
indicates that the files that satisfy that search are found at |
Thanks very much. Yeah, just to clarify, no concern here that there was unexpected behaviour, just lack of clarity from the docs and messages from I think this could be more quickly clear for user for the documentation for Personally, I would also favor the Are the list of options available for the
On tracing through now I see that directs me to |
I think this is now fixed via #186 |
Collaborators were surprised and slightly confused today that
orderly_location_pull_packet()
did not require specification of a location from which pulling.That also gave rise to a similar question of what happens if the same packet exists at multiple locations—which is it pulling from?
Is the answer that it doesn't matter because the content must be the same? Will it default to pulling from whichever location appears first in
orderly_location_list()
?I notice in the message below that message specifies it came from
root1
:Here's a little example I used to explore the behaviour for myself:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: