Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

README.md missing inclusion of run ID information in dorado demux #1144

Open
claczny opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

README.md missing inclusion of run ID information in dorado demux #1144

claczny opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@claczny
Copy link

claczny commented Nov 20, 2024

Dear all,

when running dorado demux, I followed https://github.com/nanoporetech/dorado#classifying-existing-datasets. I was thus expecting the resulting bam files to have the kit name as the prefix.
However, they had the run ID as prefix, followed by the kit name.
I gathered the run ID from the report_*.md file of the run.

Maybe I have missed something but if this is the intended behavior, may I suggest to adjust the README.md accordingly? :)

Thank you!

Best wishes and stay safe,

Cedric

@malton-ont malton-ont added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 20, 2024
@smaegol
Copy link

smaegol commented Nov 29, 2024

I would like to follow up on this. The appearance of this feature (run_id in the filename) was unexpected and has caused some problems with the analysis. Would it be possible for dorado demux to include the run_id in the file name as an option rather than the default behavior? Alternatively, could there be an option to disable this feature?

Best regards,
Paweł

@musikutiv
Copy link

same here. the sudden appearance of run id is annoying. would like to have control over this behaviour

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants