-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question regarding command-line basecalling #1166
Comments
Hi @hwangumn, Best regards, |
Thanks for the info. Do I also change calls.bam to reads. fastq? Will the output be in folders named with barcode (i.e, barcode01, barcode02, barcode03, etc)? |
To split barcodes into files in this way please pipe the output from basecaller into demux as explained here dorado basecaller <model> <reads> --emit-fastq ... | dorado demux --kit-name <kit-name> --output-dir <output-dir> Rich |
Hi Rich: |
update - it seems like I should use SQK-RBK114-96 instead of SQK-NBD114-96. I will see if that resolve the issue. |
Hi,
I initially tried using MinKNOW for basecalling, but the process took too long on my PC (i9-10850k, GTX3080). I am now using the A100 on our supercomputing institute for basecalling. I am wondering how to convert .bam files into .fastq files with dorado. The demultiplexed output from MinKNOW consists of individual folders (named with barcodes) containing .fastq files. Will the command-line code below produce similar results?
dorado basecaller hac <Path_to_Pods5> --kit-name SQK-NBD114-96 --output-dir /<Path_to_Output_Folder> > calls.bam
And have the barcodes been removed from the output files?
Thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: