Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Foldback chimeras #590

Open
itslittman opened this issue Jan 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Foldback chimeras #590

itslittman opened this issue Jan 21, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@itslittman
Copy link

itslittman commented Jan 21, 2024

Is there a way to get rid of duplex foldback chimeras? It doesn't seem like Dorado splits the + and - strand of duplex reads into two reads. I mean I suppose technically they're the same read, but that shouldn't be denoted by making them look chimeric.

My work involves actual chimeric reads (fusion genes), so all these extra ones make it much more tedious to sift through when trying to confirm genomic breakpoints for fusions I find in my dRNA data. Thanks!

@vellamike
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @itslittman

Could you give me a small example of what you mean? Dorado does split the + and - strand into two reads so it would be helpful to have an example with some short "mock" reads of what the issue that you're seeing is.

@itslittman
Copy link
Author

@vellamike this:
image

@wilsonte-umich
Copy link

wilsonte-umich commented Feb 12, 2024

I believe this post is asking about my query in #443, which wasn't answered. From my examples, I think some foldback chimeras (where the two strands of the same duplex are sequenced as one initial read) are missed if they aren't splittable at the internal junction.

Thus, the following are processed as duplex:

read1 >>>>>>>> read2 <<<<<<<<
read1 >>>>>>>>||<<<<<<<< (where || is a splittable junction)

But the following is not, although occurs with some frequency:

read1 >>>>>>>>//<<<<<<<< (where // is a non-splittable junction)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants