You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there a way to get rid of duplex foldback chimeras? It doesn't seem like Dorado splits the + and - strand of duplex reads into two reads. I mean I suppose technically they're the same read, but that shouldn't be denoted by making them look chimeric.
My work involves actual chimeric reads (fusion genes), so all these extra ones make it much more tedious to sift through when trying to confirm genomic breakpoints for fusions I find in my dRNA data. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Could you give me a small example of what you mean? Dorado does split the + and - strand into two reads so it would be helpful to have an example with some short "mock" reads of what the issue that you're seeing is.
I believe this post is asking about my query in #443, which wasn't answered. From my examples, I think some foldback chimeras (where the two strands of the same duplex are sequenced as one initial read) are missed if they aren't splittable at the internal junction.
Thus, the following are processed as duplex:
read1 >>>>>>>> read2 <<<<<<<<
read1 >>>>>>>>||<<<<<<<< (where || is a splittable junction)
But the following is not, although occurs with some frequency:
read1 >>>>>>>>//<<<<<<<< (where // is a non-splittable junction)
Is there a way to get rid of duplex foldback chimeras? It doesn't seem like Dorado splits the + and - strand of duplex reads into two reads. I mean I suppose technically they're the same read, but that shouldn't be denoted by making them look chimeric.
My work involves actual chimeric reads (fusion genes), so all these extra ones make it much more tedious to sift through when trying to confirm genomic breakpoints for fusions I find in my dRNA data. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: