This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 18, 2024. It is now read-only.
[Issue #24] Add GET /opportunity/:opportunityId/versions #82
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
acouch
approved these changes
Jun 25, 2024
acouch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2024
Fixes HHS#2079 Adds an endpoint to fetch opportunity versions * Only includes some of the filters that we'll need to include Adds a lot of utilities for setting up opportunities for local development and testing with versions https://docs.google.com/document/d/18oWmjQJKunMKy6cfnfUnyGEX33uu5UDPnRktD_wRFlE/edit#heading=h.4xmkylqq7mnx provides a lot of context for how opportunity versioning works in the existing system - which is to say its very very complex. I'm sure we'll alter that behavior as we go forward, for now I kept the endpoint simple in terms of its filters, just removing obvious cases (eg. the summary record is marked as deleted). I'm also not certain what we want to do with naming. I really don't like my current approach of "forecast" and "non-forecast", but we can address that later as well. -- Beyond understanding what versioning logic we needed to support, the most complex component by far is setting up the data in the first place in an easy manner. I originally tried some ideas using the factory classes themselves, but due to the order of operations necessary to do that, that wasn't possible (in short, to create prior history records, I first need the current record, but that doesn't exist until after everything else in a factory runs). So, I went with a builder process that wraps the factories and sets up some reasonable scenarios for you. Its clunky, but seems to work well enough. --------- Co-authored-by: nava-platform-bot <[email protected]>
acouch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2024
Fixes HHS#2079 Adds an endpoint to fetch opportunity versions * Only includes some of the filters that we'll need to include Adds a lot of utilities for setting up opportunities for local development and testing with versions https://docs.google.com/document/d/18oWmjQJKunMKy6cfnfUnyGEX33uu5UDPnRktD_wRFlE/edit#heading=h.4xmkylqq7mnx provides a lot of context for how opportunity versioning works in the existing system - which is to say its very very complex. I'm sure we'll alter that behavior as we go forward, for now I kept the endpoint simple in terms of its filters, just removing obvious cases (eg. the summary record is marked as deleted). I'm also not certain what we want to do with naming. I really don't like my current approach of "forecast" and "non-forecast", but we can address that later as well. -- Beyond understanding what versioning logic we needed to support, the most complex component by far is setting up the data in the first place in an easy manner. I originally tried some ideas using the factory classes themselves, but due to the order of operations necessary to do that, that wasn't possible (in short, to create prior history records, I first need the current record, but that doesn't exist until after everything else in a factory runs). So, I went with a builder process that wraps the factories and sets up some reasonable scenarios for you. Its clunky, but seems to work well enough. --------- Co-authored-by: nava-platform-bot <[email protected]>
acouch
pushed a commit
to HHS/simpler-grants-gov
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2024
Fixes #2079 Adds an endpoint to fetch opportunity versions * Only includes some of the filters that we'll need to include Adds a lot of utilities for setting up opportunities for local development and testing with versions https://docs.google.com/document/d/18oWmjQJKunMKy6cfnfUnyGEX33uu5UDPnRktD_wRFlE/edit#heading=h.4xmkylqq7mnx provides a lot of context for how opportunity versioning works in the existing system - which is to say its very very complex. I'm sure we'll alter that behavior as we go forward, for now I kept the endpoint simple in terms of its filters, just removing obvious cases (eg. the summary record is marked as deleted). I'm also not certain what we want to do with naming. I really don't like my current approach of "forecast" and "non-forecast", but we can address that later as well. -- Beyond understanding what versioning logic we needed to support, the most complex component by far is setting up the data in the first place in an easy manner. I originally tried some ideas using the factory classes themselves, but due to the order of operations necessary to do that, that wasn't possible (in short, to create prior history records, I first need the current record, but that doesn't exist until after everything else in a factory runs). So, I went with a builder process that wraps the factories and sets up some reasonable scenarios for you. Its clunky, but seems to work well enough. --------- Co-authored-by: nava-platform-bot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes #24
Time to review: 10 mins
Changes proposed
Adds an endpoint to fetch opportunity versions
Adds a lot of utilities for setting up opportunities for local development and testing with versions
Context for reviewers
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18oWmjQJKunMKy6cfnfUnyGEX33uu5UDPnRktD_wRFlE/edit#heading=h.4xmkylqq7mnx provides a lot of context for how opportunity versioning works in the existing system - which is to say its very very complex. I'm sure we'll alter that behavior as we go forward, for now I kept the endpoint simple in terms of its filters, just removing obvious cases (eg. the summary record is marked as deleted).
I'm also not certain what we want to do with naming. I really don't like my current approach of "forecast" and "non-forecast", but we can address that later as well.
--
Beyond understanding what versioning logic we needed to support, the most complex component by far is setting up the data in the first place in an easy manner. I originally tried some ideas using the factory classes themselves, but due to the order of operations necessary to do that, that wasn't possible (in short, to create prior history records, I first need the current record, but that doesn't exist until after everything else in a factory runs). So, I went with a builder process that wraps the factories and sets up some reasonable scenarios for you. Its clunky, but seems to work well enough.