forked from JuliaTrustworthyAI/LaplaceRedux.jl
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
2023 05 02 TA Meeting Notes
Andrei32Ionescu edited this page May 29, 2023
·
2 revisions
The notes are based on the corresponding agenda.
- Location: EEMCS
- Date: Tue May 02
- Time: 13:15
- Attendees:
-
Team 11D:
- Mark Ardman
- Severin Bratus
- Adelina Cazacu
- Andrei Ionescu
- Ivan Makarov
-
Sven van der Voort
-
- Each team member reports on their progress since the last meeting, including any completed tasks and any obstacles encountered.
- Guiding questions:
- What did you do since the last meeting / last week?
- What are you planning to do next, until the next meeting / next week?
- Are there any obstacles in your way?
Everyone worked on the Project Plan and Code of Conduct, no obstacles were encountered.
- GitHub - GitLAb issues:
- We want to mirror GitLab into GitHub, because issues are not mirrored to GitLab
- We should modify the development process, which is hard to do on GitHub, so preferred is GitLab
- We can make a project on the GitHub repository, which would separate our changes from the repo and allow us to use another pipeline
- Project Plan Won't haves:
- They define the border of our scope
- Put there whatever we feel needs to be there
- Blue Checkstyle
- Leave it there, as long as we can justify our choices
- No MoSCoW for Non-Functional Requirements
- For contacting the coach, wait a few more days then send a friendly reminder
- How can we tell when documentation is sufficient:
- Every merge requests adds documentation
- Mostly up to us, but it must be there
- Project plan is part of our grading:
- If the requirements change, it's not a problem, we just have to explain it to our TA through a small document that specifies the changes
- How to quantify the quality of each other's work:
- Perhaps using code metrics, like absence of code duplication
- Doesn't need to be quantified to a number, but rather a set of requirements must be followed
- CoC:
- We can elaborate more for our quality of work targets, not necessarily just our grade
- No other questions.
- The two testing issues will be tackled by IM, SB and MA, AC
- Initial documentation will be created by IA
- Issue board must be done by next week