Skip to content

2023 05 02 TA Meeting Notes

Andrei32Ionescu edited this page May 29, 2023 · 2 revisions

Meeting Notes

The notes are based on the corresponding agenda.

Context

  • Location: EEMCS
  • Date: Tue May 02
  • Time: 13:15
  • Attendees:
    • Team 11D:

      • Mark Ardman
      • Severin Bratus
      • Adelina Cazacu
      • Andrei Ionescu
      • Ivan Makarov
    • Sven van der Voort

Agenda

Check-in / Current Progress

  • Each team member reports on their progress since the last meeting, including any completed tasks and any obstacles encountered.
  • Guiding questions:
    • What did you do since the last meeting / last week?
    • What are you planning to do next, until the next meeting / next week?
    • Are there any obstacles in your way?

Everyone worked on the Project Plan and Code of Conduct, no obstacles were encountered.

Discussion Points

  • GitHub - GitLAb issues:
    • We want to mirror GitLab into GitHub, because issues are not mirrored to GitLab
    • We should modify the development process, which is hard to do on GitHub, so preferred is GitLab
    • We can make a project on the GitHub repository, which would separate our changes from the repo and allow us to use another pipeline
  • Project Plan Won't haves:
    • They define the border of our scope
    • Put there whatever we feel needs to be there
  • Blue Checkstyle
    • Leave it there, as long as we can justify our choices
  • No MoSCoW for Non-Functional Requirements
  • For contacting the coach, wait a few more days then send a friendly reminder
  • How can we tell when documentation is sufficient:
    • Every merge requests adds documentation
    • Mostly up to us, but it must be there
  • Project plan is part of our grading:
    • If the requirements change, it's not a problem, we just have to explain it to our TA through a small document that specifies the changes
  • How to quantify the quality of each other's work:
    • Perhaps using code metrics, like absence of code duplication
    • Doesn't need to be quantified to a number, but rather a set of requirements must be followed
  • CoC:
    • We can elaborate more for our quality of work targets, not necessarily just our grade

Any Other Questions

  • No other questions.

Summary Action Items

  • The two testing issues will be tackled by IM, SB and MA, AC
  • Initial documentation will be created by IA
  • Issue board must be done by next week

Closure