-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support ash destroy action #666
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|> Ash.Query.filter(^Ash.Expr.ref(primary_key) in ^ids) | ||
|> Ash.bulk_destroy!(:destroy, %{}) | ||
|
||
:ok |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do we want to catch errors? Currently, the item action, e.g., Delete, uses try rescue
and pattern matches on the error. I don't like this, as the item action itself should not figure out why the deletion failed. In the case of Ash, the bulk delete might contain errors (in the result struct), even if it did not raise an error. I suggest moving the error handling to the adapter. @pehbehbeh
@doc """ | ||
Checks whether item action has confirmation modal. | ||
""" | ||
def has_confirm_modal?(item_action) do | ||
module = Map.fetch!(item_action, :module) | ||
|
||
function_exported?(module, :confirm, 1) | ||
end | ||
|
||
@doc """ | ||
Checks whether item action has form. | ||
""" | ||
def has_form?(item_action) do | ||
module = Map.fetch!(item_action, :module) | ||
|
||
module.fields() != [] | ||
end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thought about moving this functions in the item action use block so we can call item_action.has_form?
, but I guess we should stick with a simple function inside Backpex.ItemAction
. What do you think? @pehbehbeh
init_schema | ||
|> changeset_function.(change, metadata) | ||
|> Map.put(:action, :validate) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still not sure where to place the code that calls the changeset function and if we should move it to another module 🤔 I also did not include special calls like before_changeset
. We even state that we do not support advanced fields like HasMany
in item actions in our docs (of course, we should change this in the future).
No description provided.