ReadMe: add canary wallets & BIP352 & Bech32m [no ci] #277
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
TODO: add bech32m support. Ref: https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1794014556513046721 |
knocte
force-pushed
the
wip/updateRoadmap
branch
from
840bf8b to
cb23f67
Compare
Problem about BIP352 is: * Need electrum-server support. * Still vulnerable to UTXO consolidation problems (which could be mitigated with PayJoin...), so the privacy gain is not as awesome as one would hope. All in all, great features but still on-chain tech.
knocte
force-pushed
the
wip/updateRoadmap
branch
from
cb23f67 to
4ab4b64
Compare
knocte
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem about BIP351 is:
All in all, great features but still on-chain tech.