Document creating releases but differentiate between major/minor/patch releases

[jmborr]

Description of work:

Check all that apply:

• added release notes (if not, provide an explanation in the work description)
• updated documentation
• Source added/refactored
• Added unit tests
• Added integration tests
• Verified that tests requiring the /SNS and /HFIR filesystems pass without fail

References:

• Links to IBM EWM items: 6499, 6502

Manual test for the reviewer

(Instructions for testing here)

Check list for the reviewer

• release notes updated, or an explanation is provided as to why release notes are unnecessary
• best software practices
  • clearly named variables (better to be verbose in variable names)
  • code comments explaining the intent of code blocks
• All the tests are passing
• The documentation is up to date
• code comments added when explaining intent

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (next@365f9b5). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             next      #40   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   82.23%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       20           
  Lines           ?     2330           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1916           
  Misses          ?      414           
  Partials        ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.