[minor] refactor: Update to use service class
name as client library name when client name
input is empty
#637
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this Pull Request accomplish?
Generate Client.vi
to use theservice class
name of the measurement plug-in as the client library name, instead of using the display name, when theclient name
input provided to the wrapper VI is an empty string.Why should this Pull Request be merged?
Generate Client.vi
to use theservice class
name as the client library name when theclient name
input provided to the wrapper VI is an empty string. This change ensures the default value used for theclient name
is unique, avoiding potential naming conflicts due to similar library names as in the case of using the measurement's display name.What testing has been done?
client name
input set to empty string and verified the wrapper VI is working as expected.