Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add codes for tricky parameters #46
add codes for tricky parameters #46
Changes from 10 commits
20332f8
ec4807f
348aaa5
bb163cc
3801117
95968ff
0c4b7af
7666b1b
e601238
e2188c2
e130de3
3c414c2
7d6261b
014c1dd
4cd794b
bbc59fb
7ad4b83
0254a20
89d47ff
2ffc4d6
620764b
5acffa5
0ea0c7c
78e201f
e08e674
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Following the API, I'd name the loop variable
typeParameterValue
rather thantypeVariable
. (I also suggest changing the associated variables, liketypeVariableFullName
->typeParameterValueFullName
.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm also concerned that this code might be overspecialized to the case where classes that have type parameters are used as parameters. Can you add a test case where the target method also defines the type variable in use, such as:
In particular, I'd like a test like this so that we can be certain that this code won't be triggered (creating a class named "T"!) in that case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No extraneous class is created, but Specimin does crash in this case, because it looks for the class
T
(i.e., a class with the type variable's name). I'll commit the test on this branch. (I don't think I'll have time to actually fix the bug right now, but maybe I'll do that in a bit.)