reviewdog: Too many results (annotations) in diff. You may miss some annotations due to GitHub limitation for annotation created by logging command. Please check GitHub Actions log console to see all results. Limitation: - 10 warning annotations and 10 error annotations per step - 50 annotations per job (sum of annotations from all the steps) - 50 annotations per run (separate from the job annotations, these annotations aren't created by users) Source: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/26680#discussioncomment-3252835

[alex] reported by reviewdog 🐶 Be careful with `executed`, it’s profane in some cases executed retext-profanities Raw Output: 155:93-155:101 warning Be careful with `executed`, it’s profane in some cases executed retext-profanities

[alex] reported by reviewdog 🐶 `easily` may be insensitive, try not to use it easy retext-equality Raw Output: 183:121-183:127 warning `easily` may be insensitive, try not to use it easy retext-equality

[alex] reported by reviewdog 🐶 `basically` may be insensitive, try not to use it basically retext-equality Raw Output: 462:6-462:15 warning `basically` may be insensitive, try not to use it basically retext-equality

[alex] reported by reviewdog 🐶 `master` may be insensitive, use `primary`, `lead`, `hub`, `reference` instead master retext-equality Raw Output: 657:174-657:180 warning `master` may be insensitive, use `primary`, `lead`, `hub`, `reference` instead master retext-equality

[alex] reported by reviewdog 🐶 `slave` may be insensitive, use `secondary`, `worker`, `replica`, `node` instead slave retext-equality Raw Output: 657:181-657:186 warning `slave` may be insensitive, use `secondary`, `worker`, `replica`, `node` instead slave retext-equality

[alex] reported by reviewdog 🐶 Don’t use `slave`, it’s profane slave retext-profanities Raw Output: 657:181-657:186 warning Don’t use `slave`, it’s profane slave retext-profanities

[alex] reported by reviewdog 🐶 Reconsider using `black`, it may be profane black retext-profanities Raw Output: 703:80-703:85 warning Reconsider using `black`, it may be profane black retext-profanities

[alex] reported by reviewdog 🐶 `master` may be insensitive, use `primary`, `lead`, `hub`, `reference` instead master retext-equality Raw Output: 747:29-747:35 warning `master` may be insensitive, use `primary`, `lead`, `hub`, `reference` instead master retext-equality

[alex] reported by reviewdog 🐶 `Just` may be insensitive, try not to use it just retext-equality Raw Output: 881:1-881:5 warning `Just` may be insensitive, try not to use it just retext-equality