-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Programs.version
is needed
#324
Comments
@yegor256 @maxonfjvipon WDYT? |
@maxonfjvipon @yegor256 how about this idea? |
@h1alexbel I like the idea. Let's do it |
@h1alexbel maybe simply put |
@yegor256 Yes, my plan was to read version from
|
h1alexbel
added a commit
to h1alexbel/lints
that referenced
this issue
Feb 11, 2025
h1alexbel
added a commit
to h1alexbel/lints
that referenced
this issue
Feb 11, 2025
h1alexbel
added a commit
to h1alexbel/lints
that referenced
this issue
Feb 11, 2025
h1alexbel
added a commit
to h1alexbel/lints
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently, we cannot get the version of
lints
library, without creating theDefect
, since it's implementation is package-private (Defect.Simple
). Besides that, in some cases it's suboptimal to retrieve only one element from all the received defects to take its.version()
. I suggest we introduce new method:version()
inProgram
orPrograms
in order to do it easier:This idea was initiated by this: objectionary/eo#3897 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: