#107/ Update GetNodeVersionInfo response object #117
Conversation
WalkthroughA new Java class Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Unit Test Results 60 files ±0 60 suites ±0 24s ⏱️ ±0s For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit db9e3d1. ± Comparison against base commit db9e3d1. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
SDK Examples Unit Test Results37 files 37 suites 6m 18s ⏱️ Results for commit fc88f83. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Common Integration Test Results1 files 1 suites 7s ⏱️ Results for commit fc88f83. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
lealobanov
force-pushed
the
get-node-version-info-protobuf-schema
branch
from
8275806 to
97ed1d5
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
kotlin-example/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/examples/kotlin/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnector.kt (2)
9-14: LGTM: Method implementation is correct. Consider adding KDoc.The
getNodeVersionInfo()method correctly handles both success and error cases from the API call. It follows Kotlin best practices and is concisely implemented.Consider adding KDoc to the method to provide more context and usage information. For example:
/** * Retrieves the node version information from the Flow Access API. * * @return FlowNodeVersionInfo containing the node version details. * @throws Exception if the API call fails, with the error message and associated throwable. */ fun getNodeVersionInfo(): FlowNodeVersionInfo { // ... existing implementation ... }
1-15: Overall implementation looks good and aligns with PR objectives.The
GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnectorclass provides a clean and efficient way to interact with the Flow Access API for retrieving node version information. The implementation is concise, follows Kotlin best practices, and correctly handles both success and error scenarios.This implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of updating the GetNodeVersionInfo response object and supporting the Access API endpoint.
Consider the following suggestions for future improvements:
- Add unit tests to ensure the connector behaves correctly with various API responses.
- If this connector is part of a larger set of API interactions, consider creating a base class or interface to standardize error handling and response processing across different API calls.
java-example/src/main/java/org/onflow/examples/java/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnector.java (2)
6-8: LGTM: Class structure is well-designed, with a minor naming suggestion.The class structure is well-designed with proper encapsulation. The use of a final field for
accessAPIpromotes immutability, which is a good practice.Consider renaming the class to
NodeVersionInfoAccessApiConnectorfor better consistency with Java naming conventions (API should be capitalized in compound words).
13-21: LGTM with suggestions: getNodeVersionInfo method is functional but could be improved.The method correctly handles both success and error cases. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:
- Consider using a custom checked exception instead of RuntimeException for better error handling and documentation.
- Add a null check for the response to prevent potential NullPointerExceptions.
- Use pattern matching (if your Java version supports it) instead of instanceof for more concise code.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
public FlowNodeVersionInfo getNodeVersionInfo() throws NodeVersionInfoException { FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse<FlowNodeVersionInfo> response = accessAPI.getNodeVersionInfo(); if (response == null) { throw new NodeVersionInfoException("Received null response from API"); } if (response instanceof FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse.Success success) { return success.getData(); } else if (response instanceof FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse.Error error) { throw new NodeVersionInfoException(error.getMessage(), error.getThrowable()); } else { throw new NodeVersionInfoException("Unexpected response type: " + response.getClass().getName()); } } public class NodeVersionInfoException extends Exception { public NodeVersionInfoException(String message) { super(message); } public NodeVersionInfoException(String message, Throwable cause) { super(message, cause); } }This refactoring includes a null check, uses pattern matching (if supported by your Java version), and introduces a custom checked exception for more explicit error handling.
kotlin-example/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/examples/kotlin/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnectorTest.kt (2)
11-12: LGTM: Class declaration and annotation are appropriate.The
@FlowEmulatorProjectTestannotation correctly sets up the Flow emulator environment for testing. The class name follows the convention for test classes.Consider adding a brief KDoc comment describing the purpose of this test class for better documentation.
23-31: LGTM with suggestions: Test method is well-structured but could be more comprehensive.The test method effectively verifies the basic functionality of
getNodeVersionInfo(). However, consider the following improvements:
- The current assertions check for zero values and null, which might not represent real-world scenarios. Consider using more realistic test data.
- Add tests for error scenarios, such as network failures or invalid responses.
- Consider parameterized tests to cover various input scenarios.
Here's an example of how you could enhance the test:
@ParameterizedTest @MethodSource("nodeVersionInfoProvider") fun `Can fetch node version info for various scenarios`( protocolVersion: Int, sporkRootBlockHeight: Int, nodeRootBlockHeight: Int, compatibleRange: FlowCompatibleRange? ) { // Mock the accessAPI to return specific values every { accessAPI.getNodeVersionInfo() } returns FlowNodeVersionInfo( protocolVersion, sporkRootBlockHeight, nodeRootBlockHeight, compatibleRange ) val nodeVersionInfo = nodeVersionInfoConnector.getNodeVersionInfo() assertNotNull(nodeVersionInfo) assertEquals(protocolVersion, nodeVersionInfo.protocolVersion) assertEquals(sporkRootBlockHeight, nodeVersionInfo.sporkRootBlockHeight) assertEquals(nodeRootBlockHeight, nodeVersionInfo.nodeRootBlockHeight) assertEquals(compatibleRange, nodeVersionInfo.compatibleRange) } companion object { @JvmStatic fun nodeVersionInfoProvider() = Stream.of( Arguments.of(1, 100, 200, FlowCompatibleRange(1, 2)), Arguments.of(2, 300, 400, null), // Add more test cases as needed ) }This approach allows testing multiple scenarios and provides more comprehensive coverage.
java-example/src/test/java/org/onflow/examples/java/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnectorTest.java (2)
12-13: LGTM: Class declaration and annotation are appropriate.The class name and annotation are well-chosen. However, consider adding a brief Javadoc comment to describe the purpose of this test class.
You could add a comment like this:
/** * Test class for {@link GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnector}. * This class verifies the functionality of fetching node version information. */ @FlowEmulatorProjectTest(flowJsonLocation = "../flow/flow.json") public class GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnectorTest { // ... existing code ... }
22-30: LGTM: Test method is comprehensive, but consider adding more scenarios.The
canFetchNodeVersionInfotest method is well-structured and covers the basic functionality. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add more test cases to cover different scenarios, such as non-zero values for version fields.
- Consider testing error cases, like network failures or unexpected responses.
- The current test assumes specific initial values (0 and null). Verify if these are the expected default values or if they should be different.
Here's an example of an additional test case you might consider:
@Test public void handleNonZeroVersionInfo() { // Mock or set up a non-zero version info FlowNodeVersionInfo expectedInfo = new FlowNodeVersionInfo( 1, // protocolVersion 100, // sporkRootBlockHeight 200, // nodeRootBlockHeight new FlowCompatibleRange(1, 2) // compatibleRange ); // Assuming you can mock the accessAPI to return this expectedInfo // when getNodeVersionInfo is called FlowNodeVersionInfo actualInfo = nodeVersionInfoConnector.getNodeVersionInfo(); assertEquals(expectedInfo.getProtocolVersion(), actualInfo.getProtocolVersion()); assertEquals(expectedInfo.getSporkRootBlockHeight(), actualInfo.getSporkRootBlockHeight()); assertEquals(expectedInfo.getNodeRootBlockHeight(), actualInfo.getNodeRootBlockHeight()); assertNotNull(actualInfo.getCompatibleRange()); assertEquals(expectedInfo.getCompatibleRange().getMinProtocolVersion(), actualInfo.getCompatibleRange().getMinProtocolVersion()); assertEquals(expectedInfo.getCompatibleRange().getMaxProtocolVersion(), actualInfo.getCompatibleRange().getMaxProtocolVersion()); }This additional test case would help ensure that the connector correctly handles non-zero and non-null values.
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/FlowAccessApi.kt (1)
60-61: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The new
getNodeVersionInfo()method is a great addition that aligns well with the PR objectives. It follows the interface's existing patterns and naming conventions.Consider adding a KDoc comment to describe the method's purpose and any potential exceptions. For example:
/** * Retrieves the version information of the node. * * @return An AccessApiCallResponse containing FlowNodeVersionInfo on success, * or an error message if the operation fails. */ fun getNodeVersionInfo(): AccessApiCallResponse<FlowNodeVersionInfo>sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowNodeVersionInfoTest.kt (2)
11-32: LGTM: Comprehensive builder test with a minor enhancement suggestion.The test thoroughly verifies that the builder correctly reflects all properties of the original
FlowNodeVersionInfoinstance. Good use ofassertArrayEqualsfor byte array comparison ofsporkId.Consider adding a test case with a non-null
compatibleRangeto ensure the builder handles this property correctly as well.
73-117: LGTM: Comprehensive test forFlowNodeVersionInfoequality and hashcode.This test effectively verifies the equality and hashcode implementations of
FlowNodeVersionInfo. It covers various scenarios, including byte array equality forsporkIdand handling of nullcompatibleRange. The test ensures that equal objects have the same hashcode and unequal objects have different hashcodes, which is crucial for correct behavior in collections.Consider adding a test case where all properties are the same except for
compatibleRange, to ensure it's properly factored into equality and hashcode calculations.sdk/src/intTest/org/onflow/flow/sdk/transaction/TransactionIntegrationTest.kt (1)
58-74: Update error message and consider relaxing assertionsThe new test method looks good overall, but there are a few points to consider:
The error message in the catch block doesn't match the operation being performed. It should be updated to reflect that you're retrieving node version info, not network parameters.
The assertions for specific values (0 for various fields) might be too rigid for an integration test. Consider using more flexible assertions that check for non-null or non-negative values instead.
There's no assertion for the
semVerfield ofnodeVersionInfo. Consider adding one to ensure this field is also populated.Here's a suggested improvement:
@Test fun `Can get node version info`() { val nodeVersionInfo = try { handleResult( accessAPI.getNodeVersionInfo(), "Failed to get node version info" ) } catch (e: Exception) { fail("Failed to retrieve node version info: ${e.message}") } assertThat(nodeVersionInfo).isNotNull() assertThat(nodeVersionInfo.protocolVersion).isNotNegative() assertThat(nodeVersionInfo.sporkRootBlockHeight).isNotNegative() assertThat(nodeVersionInfo.nodeRootBlockHeight).isNotNegative() assertThat(nodeVersionInfo.semVer).isNotEmpty() // Only assert compatibleRange is null if that's the expected behavior // assertThat(nodeVersionInfo.compatibleRange).isNull() }This suggestion relaxes the assertions to be more suitable for an integration test while still verifying that the method returns valid data.
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImpl.kt (1)
345-362: LGTM! Consider minor refactoring for improved readability.The implementation of
getNodeVersionInfolooks good and aligns with the PR objectives. It correctly processes the response and handles potential errors.Consider extracting the creation of
FlowNodeVersionInfointo a separate private method for improved readability. Here's a suggested refactoring:override fun getNodeVersionInfo(): FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse<FlowNodeVersionInfo> { return try { val ret = api.getNodeVersionInfo( Access.GetNodeVersionInfoRequest.newBuilder() .build() ) - - val compatibleRange = if (ret.info.hasCompatibleRange()) { - FlowCompatibleRange(ret.info.compatibleRange.startHeight, ret.info.compatibleRange.endHeight) - } else { - null - } - - FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse.Success(FlowNodeVersionInfo(ret.info.semver, ret.info.commit, ret.info.sporkId.toByteArray(), ret.info.protocolVersion, ret.info.sporkRootBlockHeight, ret.info.nodeRootBlockHeight, compatibleRange)) + FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse.Success(createFlowNodeVersionInfo(ret.info)) } catch (e: Exception) { FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse.Error("Failed to get node version info", e) } } + +private fun createFlowNodeVersionInfo(info: Access.NodeVersionInfo): FlowNodeVersionInfo { + val compatibleRange = if (info.hasCompatibleRange()) { + FlowCompatibleRange(info.compatibleRange.startHeight, info.compatibleRange.endHeight) + } else { + null + } + return FlowNodeVersionInfo( + info.semver, + info.commit, + info.sporkId.toByteArray(), + info.protocolVersion, + info.sporkRootBlockHeight, + info.nodeRootBlockHeight, + compatibleRange + ) +}This refactoring improves readability by separating the response processing logic from the main method body.
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (1)
332-368: LGTM! Consider adding more test scenarios.The new test method for
getNodeVersionInfois well-structured and comprehensive. It effectively tests all fields of the NodeVersionInfo object and aligns with the PR objectives.To further improve the test coverage, consider adding the following scenarios:
- Test when the
compatibleRangeis null.- Test error scenarios (e.g., when the API call fails).
Here's an example of how you could test for a null
compatibleRange:@Test fun `test getNodeVersionInfo with null compatibleRange`() { val mockNodeVersionInfo = Access.GetNodeVersionInfoResponse.newBuilder() .setInfo( NodeVersionInfoOuterClass.NodeVersionInfo.newBuilder() .setSemver("v0.0.1") .setCommit("123456") .setSporkId(ByteString.copyFromUtf8("sporkId")) .setProtocolVersion(5) .setSporkRootBlockHeight(1000) .setNodeRootBlockHeight(1001) // No compatibleRange set .build() ).build() `when`(api.getNodeVersionInfo(any())).thenReturn(setupFutureMock(mockNodeVersionInfo)) val result = asyncFlowAccessApi.getNodeVersionInfo().get() assert(result is FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse.Success) result as FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse.Success val nodeVersionInfo = result.data assertEquals("v0.0.1", nodeVersionInfo.semver) assertEquals("123456", nodeVersionInfo.commit) assertArrayEquals("sporkId".toByteArray(), nodeVersionInfo.sporkId) assertEquals(5, nodeVersionInfo.protocolVersion) assertEquals(1000L, nodeVersionInfo.sporkRootBlockHeight) assertEquals(1001L, nodeVersionInfo.nodeRootBlockHeight) assertNull(nodeVersionInfo.compatibleRange) }sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (2)
12-12: Consider using specific imports for better code clarity.While using wildcard imports (
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*andimport org.onflow.protobuf.entities.*) can reduce clutter in test files, it may make it less clear which specific assertions or entities are being used. Consider importing only the necessary classes or functions for improved code readability and maintainability.Also applies to: 19-19
336-370: LGTM! Consider extracting the mock response creation for improved readability.The new test method
Test getNodeVersionInfois well-structured and comprehensive. It covers all fields of theNodeVersionInfoandCompatibleRangeobjects, and uses appropriate assertions to verify each field. The test follows the Arrange-Act-Assert pattern, which is a good practice.To further improve readability, consider extracting the creation of the mock
GetNodeVersionInfoResponseinto a separate helper method. This would make the test method more concise and easier to understand at a glance.Example:
private fun createMockNodeVersionInfoResponse(): Access.GetNodeVersionInfoResponse { return Access.GetNodeVersionInfoResponse.newBuilder() .setInfo( NodeVersionInfoOuterClass.NodeVersionInfo.newBuilder() .setSemver("v0.0.1") .setCommit("123456") .setSporkId(ByteString.copyFromUtf8("sporkId")) .setProtocolVersion(5) .setSporkRootBlockHeight(1000) .setNodeRootBlockHeight(1001) .setCompatibleRange( NodeVersionInfoOuterClass.CompatibleRange.newBuilder() .setStartHeight(100) .setEndHeight(200) .build() ) .build() ).build() }Then, in the test method:
val mockNodeVersionInfo = createMockNodeVersionInfoResponse()This change would make the test method more focused on its primary purpose of testing the
getNodeVersionInfofunction.sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImpl.kt (1)
517-541: LGTM! Consider extracting response mapping to a separate method.The implementation of
getNodeVersionInfo()is consistent with other methods in the class and correctly handles exceptions and response processing. Good job on handling the nullablecompatibleRange.To improve readability and maintainability, consider extracting the response mapping logic (lines 529-535) into a separate private method. This would make the main method more concise and easier to understand at a glance.
Here's a suggested refactor:
private fun mapToFlowNodeVersionInfo(info: Access.NodeVersionInfo): FlowNodeVersionInfo { val compatibleRange = if (info.hasCompatibleRange()) { FlowCompatibleRange(info.compatibleRange.startHeight, info.compatibleRange.endHeight) } else { null } return FlowNodeVersionInfo( info.semver, info.commit, info.sporkId.toByteArray(), info.protocolVersion, info.sporkRootBlockHeight, info.nodeRootBlockHeight, compatibleRange ) }Then, in the
getNodeVersionInfo()method, you can simplify the success case:FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse.Success(mapToFlowNodeVersionInfo(response.info))This refactoring would make the code more modular and easier to maintain.
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (1)
1170-1230: LGTM: FlowNodeVersionInfo class is well-implemented with a minor suggestion.The FlowNodeVersionInfo data class is comprehensively structured, covering all necessary aspects of node version information. The companion object, overridden equals() and hashCode() methods, and the builder method are all well-implemented.
Consider updating the builder method to handle the compatibleRange property:
@JvmOverloads fun builder(builder: NodeVersionInfoOuterClass.NodeVersionInfo.Builder = NodeVersionInfoOuterClass.NodeVersionInfo.newBuilder()): NodeVersionInfoOuterClass.NodeVersionInfo.Builder = builder .setSemver(semver) .setCommit(commit) .setSporkId(UnsafeByteOperations.unsafeWrap(sporkId)) .setProtocolVersion(protocolVersion) .setSporkRootBlockHeight(sporkRootBlockHeight) .setNodeRootBlockHeight(nodeRootBlockHeight) + .apply { + compatibleRange?.let { + setCompatibleRange(NodeVersionInfoOuterClass.NodeVersionInfo.CompatibleRange.newBuilder() + .setStartHeight(it.startHeight) + .setEndHeight(it.endHeight) + ) + } + }This change ensures that the compatibleRange is properly set in the builder when it's available.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- java-example/src/main/java/org/onflow/examples/java/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnector.java (1 hunks)
- java-example/src/test/java/org/onflow/examples/java/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnectorTest.java (1 hunks)
- kotlin-example/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/examples/kotlin/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnector.kt (1 hunks)
- kotlin-example/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/examples/kotlin/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnectorTest.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/intTest/org/onflow/flow/sdk/transaction/TransactionIntegrationTest.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/AsyncFlowAccessApi.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/FlowAccessApi.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImpl.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImpl.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (3 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (2 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowNodeVersionInfoTest.kt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (17)
kotlin-example/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/examples/kotlin/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnector.kt (2)
1-5: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are correct.The package name follows Kotlin naming conventions, and the imports are relevant to the class functionality. No unused imports are present.
6-8: LGTM: Class definition is well-structured.The
GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnectorclass is correctly marked as internal and takes an appropriate parameter. The class name accurately describes its purpose.java-example/src/main/java/org/onflow/examples/java/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnector.java (2)
1-5: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package declaration and imports are concise and relevant to the class functionality. Good job on keeping the imports minimal and focused.
9-11: LGTM: Constructor is well-implemented.The constructor correctly initializes the final field and follows the dependency injection pattern. This design promotes testability and flexibility.
kotlin-example/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/examples/kotlin/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnectorTest.kt (3)
3-9: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imports cover all necessary JUnit 5 and Flow SDK components required for this test class.
13-16: LGTM: Properties are well-defined and appropriately annotated.The
accessAPIproperty is correctly annotated with@FlowTestClientfor automatic initialization. ThenodeVersionInfoConnectoris appropriately declared as private. Both uselateinitwhich is suitable for properties initialized in the setup method.
18-21: LGTM: Setup method is correctly implemented.The
setupmethod is properly annotated with@BeforeEachand initializes thenodeVersionInfoConnectorwith theaccessAPI. This ensures a fresh instance for each test case.java-example/src/test/java/org/onflow/examples/java/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnectorTest.java (3)
1-10: LGTM: Package and imports are well-organized.The package declaration and imports are correctly structured. All necessary classes are imported, and there are no unused imports.
14-16: LGTM: Field declarations are appropriate.The fields are correctly declared. The
@FlowTestClientannotation onaccessAPIsuggests proper use of dependency injection for testing.
17-20: LGTM: Setup method is well-structured.The
setupmethod is correctly annotated with@BeforeEachand properly initializes thenodeVersionInfoConnectorusing the injectedaccessAPI.sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/AsyncFlowAccessApi.kt (1)
53-54: LGTM: New method aligns with PR objectives and interface design.The addition of the
getNodeVersionInfo()method to theAsyncFlowAccessApiinterface is appropriate and aligns well with the PR objectives. It follows the existing pattern of returning aCompletableFuture<FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse<T>>, whereTis the specific return type, in this case,FlowNodeVersionInfo.This new method addresses the need to support the Access API endpoint for retrieving node version information, as outlined in the PR objectives and linked issues. It enhances the SDK's functionality by allowing clients to asynchronously fetch version details about the node.
A few points to consider:
- Ensure that the
FlowNodeVersionInfoclass is properly implemented to handle the protobuf objects mentioned in the PR summary.- Update the documentation to include usage examples for this new method.
- Implement this method in the concrete classes that implement the
AsyncFlowAccessApiinterface.- Add corresponding unit tests to verify the behavior of this new method.
To ensure that the
FlowNodeVersionInfoclass exists and is properly implemented, run the following script:✅ Verification successful
LGTM:
FlowNodeVersionInfois properly defined and integrated.The
FlowNodeVersionInfodata class exists insdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.ktand is appropriately utilized throughout the codebase. The newly addedgetNodeVersionInfo()method in theAsyncFlowAccessApiinterface aligns with the existing design patterns and fulfills the PR objectives.Next steps:
- Ensure that all implementations of the
AsyncFlowAccessApiinterface correctly override thegetNodeVersionInfo()method.- Confirm that corresponding unit tests effectively cover the new method's functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and implementation of FlowNodeVersionInfo class # Test: Search for the FlowNodeVersionInfo class definition ast-grep --lang kotlin --pattern 'class FlowNodeVersionInfo { $$$ }' # Test: Check for any usage of FlowNodeVersionInfo in the codebase rg --type kotlin 'FlowNodeVersionInfo'Length of output: 3693
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and implementation of FlowNodeVersionInfo data class # Test: Search for the FlowNodeVersionInfo data class definition ast-grep --lang kotlin --pattern 'data class FlowNodeVersionInfo { $$$ }' # Test: Check for any usage of FlowNodeVersionInfo in the codebase rg --type kotlin 'FlowNodeVersionInfo'Length of output: 3698
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and implementation of FlowNodeVersionInfo data class with constructor parameters # Test: Search for the FlowNodeVersionInfo data class definition with constructor parameters ast-grep --lang kotlin --pattern 'data class FlowNodeVersionInfo($_) { $$$ }' # Test: Check for any usage of FlowNodeVersionInfo in the codebase rg --type kotlin 'FlowNodeVersionInfo'Length of output: 3701
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowNodeVersionInfoTest.kt (4)
1-9: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and concise.The import statements cover all necessary classes for testing, including JUnit assertions, Protobuf utilities, and the SDK classes under test.
34-56: LGTM: Thorough test of theofmethod for Protobuf conversion.This test effectively verifies the conversion from a Protobuf
NodeVersionInfoto aFlowNodeVersionInfoinstance. All properties are correctly asserted, including the null check forcompatibleRange. The use ofUnsafeByteOperations.unsafeWrap()forsporkIdis appropriate for Protobuf handling.
58-71: LGTM: Well-structured test forFlowCompatibleRangeequality and hashcode.This test effectively verifies the equality and hashcode implementations of
FlowCompatibleRange. It covers both positive (equal objects) and negative (unequal objects) cases, ensuring that equal objects have the same hashcode and unequal objects have different hashcodes. This is crucial for the correct behavior of these objects in collections.
1-117: Overall: Well-structured and comprehensive test suite.This test file provides thorough coverage for the
FlowNodeVersionInfoandFlowCompatibleRangeclasses. It effectively tests the builder pattern, static factory method, equality, and hashcode implementations. The tests are well-organized and cover various scenarios, including edge cases like null properties and byte array comparisons.A few minor suggestions have been made to enhance the test coverage further, but overall, this is a solid set of unit tests that will help ensure the reliability and correctness of the SDK classes.
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (2)
1165-1168: LGTM: FlowCompatibleRange class is well-defined.The FlowCompatibleRange data class is correctly implemented with appropriate property types (Long) for block heights. The Serializable interface implementation is a good practice for data classes in this context.
1165-1230: Summary: New classes enhance SDK capabilities for handling node version information.The addition of FlowCompatibleRange and FlowNodeVersionInfo classes expands the SDK's ability to work with node version details. These classes are well-integrated with the existing codebase, following established patterns and best practices. They provide a robust structure for handling version-related data, including compatibility ranges, which is crucial for managing blockchain node interactions.
The implementation is solid, with proper use of serialization, null safety, and conversion methods between SDK and protobuf objects. These additions will facilitate more detailed and accurate representation of node version information within the Flow SDK.
#110/ CollectionGuarantee type differs from protobuf schema
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (27)
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowQuorumCertificateTest.kt (4)
13-31: LGTM:test of() methodis well-structured and comprehensive.The test effectively verifies the
of()method's functionality by mocking the gRPC object and asserting the correct mapping of properties.Consider adding edge cases, such as testing with empty byte arrays or null values, to ensure robust error handling.
50-68: LGTM:test equals() methodcovers basic equality scenarios.The test effectively verifies the
equals()method for both equal and unequalFlowQuorumCertificateinstances.Consider enhancing the test with additional scenarios:
- Compare with
null- Compare with an object of a different type
- Test equality when only one property differs
These additions would provide more comprehensive coverage of theequals()method.
70-88: LGTM:test hashCode() methodcovers basic hash code consistency.The test effectively verifies that equal
FlowQuorumCertificateinstances have the same hash code, while different instances have different hash codes.Consider enhancing the test with additional scenarios:
- Verify hash code consistency by calling
hashCode()multiple times on the same object- Test hash code behavior when only one property differs
These additions would provide more robust coverage of thehashCode()method.
1-89: Overall structure of FlowQuorumCertificateTest is well-organized and comprehensive.The test class provides good coverage of the
FlowQuorumCertificateclass, including its construction, equality comparison, and hash code generation. The use of descriptive test method names enhances readability.Consider the following suggestions to further improve the test class:
- Add a
@BeforeEachsetup method to initialize common test data, reducing code duplication across test methods.- Include tests for any public methods of
FlowQuorumCertificatethat are not currently covered (if any).- Add tests for potential edge cases or error conditions to ensure robust error handling in the
FlowQuorumCertificateclass.sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowExecutionReceiptMetaTest.kt (1)
73-91: LGTM with suggestion: Comprehensive test forhashCode()methodThe test effectively verifies the
hashCode()method ofFlowExecutionReceiptMeta. It covers both positive and negative scenarios, ensuring that objects with the same properties have the same hash code and those with different properties have different hash codes.Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a test case to verify the consistency betweenequals()andhashCode()methods. This ensures that if two objects are equal according to theequals()method, they must have the same hash code.Here's an example of how you could add this test:
@Test fun `test consistency between equals() and hashCode()`() { val meta1 = FlowExecutionReceiptMeta(executorId1, resultId1, spocks1, executorSignature1) val meta2 = FlowExecutionReceiptMeta(executorId1, resultId1, spocks1, executorSignature1) assertTrue(meta1 == meta2 && meta1.hashCode() == meta2.hashCode()) }sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowTimeoutCertificateTest.kt (4)
45-81: LGTM: Well-structured test for the builder pattern.The test thoroughly verifies the builder pattern implementation for
FlowTimeoutCertificate. It covers all properties and ensures that the built object has the correct values. The use ofByteString.copyFrom()for byte array comparisons is a good practice.Consider adding a test case for building a
FlowTimeoutCertificatewith null values for optional properties (if any) to ensure the builder handles such cases correctly.
83-104: LGTM: Good basic test for theequals()method.The test covers the fundamental scenarios for equality testing of
FlowTimeoutCertificateinstances. It appropriately verifies that instances with identical properties are considered equal, while those with differing properties are not.Consider enhancing the test with the following suggestions:
- Add a test case comparing a
FlowTimeoutCertificateinstance withnull.- Add a test case comparing a
FlowTimeoutCertificateinstance with an object of a different type.- Test equality when only one property differs between two instances, for each property.
- If applicable, test with edge cases such as empty lists or byte arrays.
These additions would provide more comprehensive coverage of the
equals()method implementation.
106-127: LGTM: Solid basic test for thehashCode()method.The test effectively covers the fundamental scenarios for hash code testing of
FlowTimeoutCertificateinstances. It appropriately verifies that instances with identical properties have the same hash code, while those with differing properties have different hash codes.Consider enhancing the test with the following suggestions:
- Add a test case to verify that if
equals()returns true for two objects, their hash codes are also equal.- Add test cases with edge cases such as empty lists or byte arrays.
- Verify that the hash code remains consistent across multiple invocations on the same object.
- If possible, test with a larger set of objects to ensure a good distribution of hash codes.
These additions would provide more comprehensive coverage of the
hashCode()method implementation and its consistency with theequals()method.
1-128: Overall: Well-structured and comprehensive test suite forFlowTimeoutCertificate.This test file provides a solid foundation for testing the
FlowTimeoutCertificateclass. It covers all major methods (of(),builder(),equals(), andhashCode()), uses appropriate mocking techniques, and includes meaningful assertions.To further enhance the test suite, consider the following general improvements:
- Add more edge cases to each test method, especially for
equals()andhashCode().- Include tests for any potential exception scenarios.
- If there are any constraints or invariants for the
FlowTimeoutCertificateclass, add tests to verify they are maintained.- Consider adding property-based tests using a library like jqwik to test with a wider range of inputs.
- If there are any complex interactions between
FlowTimeoutCertificateand other classes, consider adding integration tests.These enhancements would provide even more robust coverage and increase confidence in the
FlowTimeoutCertificateimplementation.sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowChunkTest.kt (5)
13-49: LGTM! Consider adding a test for null input.The
test of() methodis well-structured and thoroughly tests the conversion fromExecutionResultOuterClass.ChunktoFlowChunk. It covers all properties and uses appropriate assertions.Consider adding a test case for null input to ensure the
of()method handles it gracefully, either by throwing an appropriate exception or returning a default value.
51-89: LGTM! Consider testing the builder's setter methods.The
test builder() methodeffectively verifies that thebuilder()method creates a new instance with the same properties as the originalFlowChunk. It covers all properties and uses appropriate assertions.Consider expanding this test to verify the setter methods of the builder. This would ensure that each property can be individually modified:
@Test fun `test builder() method`() { // ... existing test code ... val modifiedResult = flowChunk.builder() .setCollectionIndex(2) .setStartState(ByteString.copyFrom(ByteArray(32) { 0x07 })) // ... set other properties ... .build() assertEquals(2, modifiedResult.collectionIndex) assertEquals(ByteString.copyFrom(ByteArray(32) { 0x07 }), modifiedResult.startState) // ... assert other modified properties ... }This addition would provide more comprehensive coverage of the builder's functionality.
91-145: LGTM! Consider adding more granular equality tests.The
test equals() methodeffectively verifies the basic functionality of theequals()method forFlowChunk. It checks both equality and inequality cases.To improve the test coverage, consider adding more granular tests that check equality when only one property differs at a time. This would help identify which specific property might cause equality to fail. For example:
@Test fun `test equals() method`() { // ... existing test code ... // Test equality fails when only one property differs val flowChunk4 = flowChunk1.builder().setCollectionIndex(2).build() assertNotEquals(flowChunk1, flowChunk4) val flowChunk5 = flowChunk1.builder().setStartState(ByteString.copyFrom(ByteArray(32) { 0x07 })).build() assertNotEquals(flowChunk1, flowChunk5) // ... add similar tests for other properties ... }Also, consider adding tests for edge cases such as comparing with
nullor objects of different types:assertNotEquals(flowChunk1, null) assertNotEquals(flowChunk1, "Not a FlowChunk")These additions would provide more comprehensive coverage of the
equals()method's behavior.
147-202: LGTM! Consider adding more diverse hash code tests.The
test hashCode() methodeffectively verifies the basic functionality of thehashCode()method forFlowChunk. It checks that equal objects have the same hash code and unequal objects have different hash codes, which is crucial for the contract betweenequals()andhashCode().To enhance the test coverage, consider the following improvements:
- Test consistency across multiple invocations:
assertEquals(flowChunk1.hashCode(), flowChunk1.hashCode())
- Test with more diverse objects:
val flowChunk4 = flowChunk1.builder().setCollectionIndex(2).build() val flowChunk5 = flowChunk1.builder().setStartState(ByteString.copyFrom(ByteArray(32) { 0x07 })).build() assertNotEquals(flowChunk1.hashCode(), flowChunk4.hashCode()) assertNotEquals(flowChunk1.hashCode(), flowChunk5.hashCode())
- Consider adding a test to verify that the hash code is reasonably distributed:
val hashCodes = mutableSetOf<Int>() for (i in 1..100) { val flowChunk = FlowChunk( collectionIndex = i, startState = ByteArray(32) { (i % 256).toByte() }, // ... set other properties ... ) hashCodes.add(flowChunk.hashCode()) } assertTrue(hashCodes.size > 95) // Expect most hash codes to be uniqueThese additions would provide more comprehensive coverage of the
hashCode()method's behavior and distribution.
1-202: Great test coverage! Consider adding edge cases and parameterized tests.The
FlowChunkTestclass provides good coverage of the main functionalities of theFlowChunkclass. The tests are well-structured, readable, and use appropriate assertions and mocking techniques.To further enhance the test suite, consider the following suggestions:
Add edge case tests, such as empty byte arrays or extreme values for numeric fields.
Implement parameterized tests for methods like
of()andbuilder()to test with a variety of inputs:@ParameterizedTest @MethodSource("provideFlowChunkData") fun `test of() method with various inputs`( collectionIndex: Int, startState: ByteArray, // ... other parameters ... ) { val grpcChunk = mock(ExecutionResultOuterClass.Chunk::class.java) // ... set up mock ... val flowChunk = FlowChunk.of(grpcChunk) // ... assertions ... } companion object { @JvmStatic fun provideFlowChunkData() = Stream.of( Arguments.of(1, ByteArray(32) { 0x01 }, /* ... */), Arguments.of(0, ByteArray(0), /* ... */), // ... more test cases ... ) }
Consider adding tests for any exception cases, if applicable.
If not already present elsewhere, add integration tests that verify the
FlowChunkclass works correctly with other components of the system.These additions would make the test suite even more robust and comprehensive.
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowExecutionResultTest.kt (6)
28-68: Consider adding more assertions for thechunkspropertyThe test comprehensively covers the creation of
FlowExecutionResultfromExecutionResultByIDResponse. To further enhance the test coverage, consider adding assertions for the properties of thechunkslist item. This will ensure that all the chunk data is correctly transferred to theFlowExecutionResultobject.For example, you could add:
with(flowExecutionResult.chunks[0]) { assertEquals(collectionIndex, this.collectionIndex) assertArrayEquals(startStateBytes, this.startState) assertArrayEquals(eventCollectionBytes, this.eventCollection) assertEquals(FlowId.of(blockIdBytes), this.blockId) assertEquals(totalComputationUsed, this.totalComputationUsed) assertEquals(numberOfTransactions, this.numberOfTransactions) assertEquals(index, this.index) assertArrayEquals(endStateBytes, this.endState) assertEquals(FlowId.of(executionDataIdBytes), this.executionDataId) assertArrayEquals(stateDeltaCommitmentBytes, this.stateDeltaCommitment) }This addition will provide a more thorough verification of the
FlowExecutionResultobject's contents.
70-105: Consider adding more assertions for thechunkspropertySimilar to the previous test method, this test could benefit from additional assertions on the
chunksproperty of the resultingFlowExecutionResultobject. This will ensure that all the chunk data is correctly transferred when creating the object from anExecutionResult.You could add the same assertions as suggested for the previous test:
with(flowExecutionResult.chunks[0]) { assertEquals(collectionIndex, this.collectionIndex) assertArrayEquals(startStateBytes, this.startState) assertArrayEquals(eventCollectionBytes, this.eventCollection) assertEquals(FlowId.of(blockIdBytes), this.blockId) assertEquals(totalComputationUsed, this.totalComputationUsed) assertEquals(numberOfTransactions, this.numberOfTransactions) assertEquals(index, this.index) assertArrayEquals(endStateBytes, this.endState) assertEquals(FlowId.of(executionDataIdBytes), this.executionDataId) assertArrayEquals(stateDeltaCommitmentBytes, this.stateDeltaCommitment) }This addition will provide a more comprehensive verification of the
FlowExecutionResultobject's contents.
107-137: Enhance builder test with more detailed assertionsThe test for the
builder()method could be more comprehensive. Consider adding more detailed assertions to verify that all properties of the built object match the originalFlowExecutionResult. This will ensure that the builder correctly transfers all data to the protobuf object.You could add assertions like:
with(result.getChunks(0)) { assertEquals(flowChunk.collectionIndex, this.collectionIndex) assertEquals(ByteString.copyFrom(flowChunk.startState), this.startState) assertEquals(ByteString.copyFrom(flowChunk.eventCollection), this.eventCollection) assertEquals(flowChunk.blockId.byteStringValue, this.blockId) assertEquals(flowChunk.totalComputationUsed, this.totalComputationUsed) assertEquals(flowChunk.numberOfTransactions, this.numberOfTransactions) assertEquals(flowChunk.index, this.index) assertEquals(ByteString.copyFrom(flowChunk.endState), this.endState) assertEquals(flowChunk.executionDataId.byteStringValue, this.executionDataId) assertEquals(ByteString.copyFrom(flowChunk.stateDeltaCommitment), this.stateDeltaCommitment) } with(result.getServiceEvents(0)) { assertEquals(serviceEvent.type, this.type) assertEquals(ByteString.copyFrom(serviceEvent.payload), this.payload) }These additional assertions will provide a more thorough verification of the builder's functionality.
139-174: Enhance equals() test with more edge casesThe test for the
equals()method covers the basic cases well. To make it more robust, consider adding the following test cases:
- Test equality with the same contents but different order of chunks and service events.
- Test equality with null values for optional fields (if any).
- Test equality with empty lists for chunks and service events.
For example, you could add:
// Test equality with different order of chunks and events val flowExecutionResult4 = FlowExecutionResult( blockId = blockId1, previousResultId = previousResultId1, chunks = listOf(chunk1, mock(FlowChunk::class.java)), serviceEvents = listOf(serviceEvent1, mock(FlowServiceEvent::class.java)) ) val flowExecutionResult5 = FlowExecutionResult( blockId = blockId1, previousResultId = previousResultId1, chunks = listOf(mock(FlowChunk::class.java), chunk1), serviceEvents = listOf(mock(FlowServiceEvent::class.java), serviceEvent1) ) assertEquals(flowExecutionResult4, flowExecutionResult5) // Test equality with empty lists val flowExecutionResult6 = FlowExecutionResult( blockId = blockId1, previousResultId = previousResultId1, chunks = emptyList(), serviceEvents = emptyList() ) val flowExecutionResult7 = FlowExecutionResult( blockId = blockId1, previousResultId = previousResultId1, chunks = emptyList(), serviceEvents = emptyList() ) assertEquals(flowExecutionResult6, flowExecutionResult7)These additional test cases will help ensure that the
equals()method handles various scenarios correctly.
176-211: Enhance hashCode() test with more edge casesThe test for the
hashCode()method covers the basic cases well. To make it more comprehensive and align it with the suggested improvements for theequals()method, consider adding the following test cases:
- Test hash code consistency with different orders of chunks and service events.
- Test hash code with null values for optional fields (if any).
- Test hash code with empty lists for chunks and service events.
For example, you could add:
// Test hash code consistency with different order of chunks and events val flowExecutionResult4 = FlowExecutionResult( blockId = blockId1, previousResultId = previousResultId1, chunks = listOf(chunk1, mock(FlowChunk::class.java)), serviceEvents = listOf(serviceEvent1, mock(FlowServiceEvent::class.java)) ) val flowExecutionResult5 = FlowExecutionResult( blockId = blockId1, previousResultId = previousResultId1, chunks = listOf(mock(FlowChunk::class.java), chunk1), serviceEvents = listOf(mock(FlowServiceEvent::class.java), serviceEvent1) ) assertEquals(flowExecutionResult4.hashCode(), flowExecutionResult5.hashCode()) // Test hash code with empty lists val flowExecutionResult6 = FlowExecutionResult( blockId = blockId1, previousResultId = previousResultId1, chunks = emptyList(), serviceEvents = emptyList() ) val flowExecutionResult7 = FlowExecutionResult( blockId = blockId1, previousResultId = previousResultId1, chunks = emptyList(), serviceEvents = emptyList() ) assertEquals(flowExecutionResult6.hashCode(), flowExecutionResult7.hashCode())These additional test cases will help ensure that the
hashCode()method is consistent with theequals()method and handles various scenarios correctly.
1-212: Overall good test coverage with room for improvementThe
FlowExecutionResultTestclass provides a solid foundation for testing theFlowExecutionResultclass. It covers the main functionality including object creation, building, equality, and hash code generation. However, to further enhance the test suite, consider the following overall improvements:
- Add more detailed assertions for object properties, especially for nested objects like chunks and service events.
- Include more edge cases in the equality and hash code tests, such as different ordering of list elements and empty lists.
- If not already present in other test files, consider adding tests for error cases, such as invalid input data or edge cases that might cause exceptions.
These enhancements will contribute to a more robust and comprehensive test suite, increasing confidence in the
FlowExecutionResultclass's correctness and reliability.sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowBlockHeaderTest.kt (3)
13-28: Consider improving test isolation fortimeoutCertificate.The companion object provides reusable test data, which is good for maintaining consistency across tests. However, the use of a static mock object for
timeoutCertificatemight lead to potential issues with test isolation.Consider creating the mock
FlowTimeoutCertificatewithin each test method that requires it, or use a@BeforeEachmethod to reset the mock before each test. This approach ensures that each test starts with a clean state and prevents potential interference between tests.Example:
@BeforeEach fun setup() { timeoutCertificate = mock(FlowTimeoutCertificate::class.java) }
29-75: Enhance test coverage fortest of() method.The test thoroughly checks the conversion from a gRPC block header to a
FlowBlockHeaderand covers most properties of theFlowBlockHeaderclass. However, it could be improved by adding assertions for thelastViewTcproperty.Consider adding assertions to verify the correct conversion of the
lastViewTcproperty. This will ensure that theTimeoutCertificateis properly mapped from the gRPC object to theFlowBlockHeaderinstance.Example:
assertNotNull(flowBlockHeader.lastViewTc) assertEquals(timeoutCertificateMock.signerIndices.toByteArray(), flowBlockHeader.lastViewTc?.signerIndices) assertEquals(timeoutCertificateMock.sigData.toByteArray(), flowBlockHeader.lastViewTc?.sigData) // Add more assertions for other properties of lastViewTc
77-136: Enhance test coverage fortest builder() method.The test thoroughly checks the conversion from a
FlowBlockHeaderto a gRPCBlockHeaderusing thebuilder()method and covers most properties of theBlockHeader. However, it could be improved by adding assertions for thelastViewTcproperty of the built gRPCBlockHeader.Consider adding assertions to verify the correct conversion of the
lastViewTcproperty in the built gRPCBlockHeader. This will ensure that theTimeoutCertificateis properly mapped from theFlowBlockHeaderinstance to the gRPC object.Example:
val builtLastViewTc = result.lastViewTc assertNotNull(builtLastViewTc) assertEquals(timeoutCertificate.view, builtLastViewTc.view) assertEquals(UnsafeByteOperations.unsafeWrap(timeoutCertificate.signerIndices), builtLastViewTc.signerIndices) assertEquals(UnsafeByteOperations.unsafeWrap(timeoutCertificate.sigData), builtLastViewTc.sigData) // Add more assertions for other properties of lastViewTcsdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (1)
397-433: LGTM! Comprehensive test for getNodeVersionInfo.The new test method
test getNodeVersionInfois well-structured and thoroughly covers all fields of the NodeVersionInfo object. It correctly asserts the values of the parsed result against the mock data, following the established pattern of other tests in this file.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider using constants for the mock values (e.g., semver, commit, sporkId) to improve readability and make it easier to update these values if needed in the future. For example:
private companion object { const val MOCK_SEMVER = "v0.0.1" const val MOCK_COMMIT = "123456" const val MOCK_SPORK_ID = "sporkId" // ... other constants ... }Then use these constants in the test method.
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (1)
355-389: Excellent addition ofgetNodeVersionInfotest.The new test method thoroughly verifies the
getNodeVersionInfofunctionality:
- It properly mocks the API response.
- All fields of the returned
FlowNodeVersionInfoobject are verified.- The test covers the happy path and correct parsing of the response.
- The use of
assertResultSuccessensures that the API call was successful before checking the result.Consider adding an additional test case for the error scenario to ensure proper error handling. For example:
@Test fun `Test getNodeVersionInfo error case`() { val exception = RuntimeException("Test exception") `when`(mockApi.getNodeVersionInfo(any())).thenThrow(exception) val result = flowAccessApiImpl.getNodeVersionInfo() assertTrue(result is FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse.Error) assertEquals("Test exception", (result as FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse.Error).message) }sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowBlockTest.kt (1)
54-57: Ensure All New Properties Are Properly TestedYou've added
executionReceiptMetaListandexecutionResultListproperties to theFlowBlockclass and assert that they are empty. To maintain thorough test coverage, consider adding more detailed tests for these properties, especially if they can contain data in other scenarios.sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (1)
317-323: Simplify the Event Filtering LogicIn the
getEventsOfTypemethod, the filtering logic can be simplified for better readability. Combining the conditions into a single expression improves clarity..filter { - if (exact) { - it.type == type - } else { - it.type.endsWith(type) - } + (exact && it.type == type) || (!exact && it.type.endsWith(type)) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (16 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (10 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (9 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowBlockHeaderTest.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowBlockTest.kt (4 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowChunkTest.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowCollectionGuaranteeTest.kt (2 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowExecutionReceiptMetaTest.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowExecutionResultTest.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowQuorumCertificateTest.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowTimeoutCertificateTest.kt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (23)
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowCollectionGuaranteeTest.kt (5)
16-17: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for new fields.The changes in this test method effectively cover the new fields (
referenceBlockId,signature, andsignerIndices) added to theFlowCollectionGuaranteeclass. The test now builds aCollectionGuaranteewith these new fields and verifies them in the resultingFlowCollectionGuaranteeobject.Also applies to: 20-20, 26-28, 36-38
44-45: LGTM! Proper test setup for new fields.The test setup has been appropriately updated to include the new fields (
referenceBlockId,signature, andsignerIndices) required for theFlowCollectionGuaranteeconstructor. This ensures that the test covers all aspects of the updated class.Also applies to: 47-47
58-60: LGTM! Comprehensive assertions for new fields.The new assertions effectively verify that the
referenceBlockId,signature, andsignerIndicesfields are correctly set in the resultingCollectionGuaranteeobject. This ensures that the conversion fromFlowCollectionGuaranteetoCollectionGuaranteeis working as expected for all fields, including the newly added ones.
49-49: LGTM! Updated constructor call.The
FlowCollectionGuaranteeconstructor call has been correctly updated to include the new fields:referenceBlockId,signature, andsignerIndices. This is consistent with the changes mentioned in the AI-generated summary.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other usages of FlowCollectionGuarantee constructor rg --type kotlin "FlowCollectionGuarantee\(" -C 2
10-10: Verify the usage of UnsafeByteOperations.The addition of
UnsafeByteOperationsimport suggests performance optimization. While this can be beneficial, it's important to ensure its usage is necessary and safe in this context.Please confirm that:
- The use of
UnsafeByteOperationsis required for performance reasons.- The byte array passed to
unsafeWrapis not modified after wrapping.- The resulting
ByteStringis not used beyond the scope where the original byte array is valid.✅ Verification successful
UnsafeByteOperations Usage Verified
The use of
UnsafeByteOperationsinFlowCollectionGuaranteeTest.ktis isolated to this test context. Please ensure that:
- The byte array passed to
unsafeWrapremains unmodified after wrapping.- The resulting
ByteStringis utilized solely within the scope where the original byte array is valid.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other usages of UnsafeByteOperations in the codebase rg --type kotlin "UnsafeByteOperations" -C 3Length of output: 1586
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowQuorumCertificateTest.kt (2)
3-9: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and concise.The import statements cover all necessary classes for JUnit 5, Mockito, and the Flow SDK. There are no unused imports, which is good for code cleanliness.
33-48: LGTM:test builder() methodeffectively verifies the builder pattern.This test comprehensively checks that the
builder()method correctly preserves all properties of theFlowQuorumCertificate. It provides good coverage for both the constructor and the builder method.sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowExecutionReceiptMetaTest.kt (4)
14-33: LGTM: Comprehensive test forof()methodThe test thoroughly verifies the mapping from
ExecutionReceiptMetatoFlowExecutionReceiptMeta. It covers all properties and uses appropriate assertions. The use of mock objects is well-implemented.
35-51: LGTM: Well-structured test forbuilder()methodThe test effectively verifies the
builder()method ofFlowExecutionReceiptMeta. It covers all properties and ensures correct conversion to the protobuf representation. The assertions are appropriate and comprehensive.
53-71: LGTM: Thorough test forequals()methodThe test effectively verifies the
equals()method ofFlowExecutionReceiptMeta. It covers both positive and negative equality scenarios, ensuring that objects with the same properties are considered equal and those with different properties are not. The assertions are appropriate and comprehensive.
1-92: Excellent test coverage and structureThe
FlowExecutionReceiptMetaTestclass provides comprehensive test coverage for theFlowExecutionReceiptMetaclass. It effectively tests all main methods (of(),builder(),equals(), andhashCode()), using well-structured test methods with appropriate assertions. The use of mock objects and varied input data ensures good scenario coverage.The test class follows good practices for unit testing in Kotlin and contributes significantly to the reliability of the
FlowExecutionReceiptMetaimplementation.sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowTimeoutCertificateTest.kt (1)
13-43: LGTM: Comprehensive test for theof()method.The test thoroughly covers all properties of the
FlowTimeoutCertificateclass and uses mocking appropriately to isolate the test from external dependencies. The assertions are meaningful and verify the correctness of theof()method.sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowExecutionResultTest.kt (1)
1-212: LGTM: Well-structured test classThe overall structure of the
FlowExecutionResultTestclass is well-organized. The use of a companion object for constants promotes code reuse and maintainability across multiple test methods.sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowBlockHeaderTest.kt (3)
1-12: LGTM: Package, imports, and class declaration are correct.The package declaration, imports, and class declaration are appropriate for the
FlowBlockHeaderTestclass. All necessary dependencies are imported, including JUnit, Mockito, and protobuf classes.
138-247: LGTM: Comprehensive tests forequals()andhashCode()methods.The tests for
equals()andhashCode()methods are well-implemented and follow best practices. They cover both positive and negative cases, ensuring that the implementation of these methods is correct. The tests verify:
- Identical instances are considered equal and have the same hash code.
- Different instances are not considered equal and have different hash codes.
This comprehensive approach helps maintain the contract between
equals()andhashCode(), which is crucial for the correct behavior ofFlowBlockHeaderobjects in collections.
1-247: Overall, well-structured and comprehensive test suite forFlowBlockHeader.The
FlowBlockHeaderTestclass provides a thorough test suite for theFlowBlockHeaderclass. It covers the main functionality, including theof(),builder(),equals(), andhashCode()methods. The tests are well-structured and follow good testing practices.A few minor improvements were suggested:
- Enhancing test isolation for the
timeoutCertificatemock object.- Adding assertions for the
lastViewTcproperty in bothof()andbuilder()tests.These suggestions, if implemented, would further improve the already solid test coverage. Great job on creating a comprehensive test suite!
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (2)
33-60: LGTM! Good addition of constants and mock object.The introduction of the
HEIGHTconstant and the comprehensivemockBlockHeaderobject enhances the test suite's readability and maintainability. ThemockBlockHeaderis well-structured and includes all necessary fields, which will be useful for multiple tests.
80-80: LGTM! Consistent use of mockBlockHeader across tests.The updates to use the
mockBlockHeaderin multiple test methods improve consistency and reduce code duplication. This change enhances the maintainability of the test suite without altering the core logic of the tests.Also applies to: 92-93, 105-106, 118-130, 142-155, 167-180
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (2)
12-12: LGTM: Import statements have been cleaned up.The import statements have been simplified by consolidating imports from
org.onflow.protobuf.entitiesand modifying the Assertions import. These changes improve code readability without introducing any issues.Also applies to: 19-19
38-57: Great refactoring: Centralized mock object creation.The addition of a companion object with
mockBlockHeaderandmockBlockproperties is an excellent refactoring. This change:
- Centralizes the creation of mock objects used across multiple test methods.
- Reduces code duplication.
- Improves maintainability by providing a single point of modification for these mock objects.
The properties are properly initialized with all necessary fields, ensuring consistency across tests.
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (3)
254-254:⚠️ Potential issueFix the Nullable Type in Getter Method
In the
FlowEventclass, the_jsonCadencevariable is initialized asnull, and thejsonCadencegetter method does not handle the possibility of_jsonCadencebeingnullduring assignment. To prevent potentialNullPointerException, consider using the safe call operator?.or ensure that_jsonCadenceis properly initialized.private var _jsonCadence: Field<*>? = null val jsonCadence: Field<*> get() { - if (_jsonCadence == null) { + if (_jsonCadence == null) { _jsonCadence = Flow.decodeJsonCadence(bytes) } return _jsonCadence!! }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Line range hint
632-715: Ensure Consistency inFlowBlockHeaderEquality and HashCode MethodsThe
equalsandhashCodemethods forFlowBlockHeadershould include all properties for accurate comparisons. Verify that properties likepayloadHash,parentVoterSigData,proposerSigData, andparentVoterIndicesare correctly compared usingcontentEqualsfor byte arrays.To confirm, run the following script to check the equality methods:
1167-1170: Check for Missing Signatures inFlowCollectionGuaranteeIn the
FlowCollectionGuarantee.ofmethod, ensure that all necessary signatures are included, especially if the reference block ID and signature fields are critical for validation.
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowBlockTest.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowBlockTest.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @@ -608,6 +618,7 @@ | |||
| signature = FlowSignature(value.signature.toByteArray()) | |||
| ) | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the Key Assignment in FlowTransactionSignature.of
In the of method for FlowTransactionSignature, signerIndex and keyIndex are both assigned value.keyId, which might be incorrect. Verify that signerIndex should be assigned differently, possibly from a different field in value.
FlowTransactionSignature(
address = FlowAddress.of(value.address.toByteArray()),
- signerIndex = value.keyId,
keyIndex = value.keyId,
+ signerIndex = /* assign correct value here */
signature = FlowSignature(value.signature.toByteArray())
)Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
signerIndex does not seem to exist anymore in the protbuf files. Will open up a separate issue for this one to investigate if this field can be removed @franklywatson
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowCollectionGuaranteeTest.kt (2)
16-39: LGTM! Consider using constants for magic numbers.The changes appropriately test the new fields added to the
FlowCollectionGuaranteeclass. The test coverage has been expanded to includereferenceBlockId,signature, andsignerIndices.Consider defining constants for the magic numbers used in the byte arrays (e.g.,
1, 2, 3,10, 11, 12, etc.) to improve readability and maintainability. For example:private companion object { val COLLECTION_ID_BYTES = byteArrayOf(1, 2, 3) val REFERENCE_BLOCK_ID_BYTES = byteArrayOf(10, 11, 12) // ... other constants }
59-61: LGTM! Consider adding null checks.The new assertions correctly verify the
referenceBlockId,signature, andsignerIndicesfields in the builtCollectionGuaranteeobject. This ensures comprehensive test coverage for all new fields.Consider adding null checks for the new fields before asserting their values. This can help catch potential issues where these fields might be unexpectedly null. For example:
assertEquals(ByteString.copyFrom(referenceBlockId.bytes), collectionGuarantee.referenceBlockId) assertNotNull(collectionGuarantee.signature, "Signature should not be null") assertEquals(ByteString.copyFrom(signature.bytes), collectionGuarantee.signature) assertNotNull(collectionGuarantee.signerIndices, "Signer indices should not be null") assertEquals(ByteString.copyFrom(signerIndices), collectionGuarantee.signerIndices)sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/FlowAccessApi.kt (1)
65-66: LGTM! Consider adding KDoc for consistency.The new
getNodeVersionInfo()method is a great addition to theFlowAccessApiinterface. It follows the established pattern of other methods and uses the appropriate return type.For consistency with other methods in this interface, consider adding KDoc to briefly describe the method's purpose and return value. For example:
/** * Retrieves version information for the node. * * @return An [AccessApiCallResponse] containing [FlowNodeVersionInfo] on success. */ fun getNodeVersionInfo(): AccessApiCallResponse<FlowNodeVersionInfo>sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowNodeVersionInfoTest.kt (4)
34-57: LGTM: Thorough test for FlowNodeVersionInfo.of methodThe test effectively verifies the conversion from a protobuf
NodeVersionInfoobject to aFlowNodeVersionInfoinstance. All properties are checked, including a null check forcompatibleRange.Consider adding a comment explaining the use of
UnsafeByteOperations.unsafeWrapforsporkIdin the protobuf builder, as it might not be immediately clear why this unsafe operation is necessary.
59-72: LGTM: Well-structured test for FlowCompatibleRange equality and hashcodeThe test effectively verifies the equality and hashcode implementations of
FlowCompatibleRange. It covers both positive and negative cases for equality and ensures hashcode consistency.Consider adding tests for edge cases, such as:
- Ranges with the same start height but different end heights.
- Ranges with the same end height but different start heights.
- A range compared with null or a different object type.
These additional cases would provide more comprehensive coverage of the equality implementation.
74-117: LGTM: Comprehensive test for FlowNodeVersionInfo equality and hashcodeThe test effectively verifies the equality and hashcode implementations of
FlowNodeVersionInfo. It covers both positive and negative cases for equality, ensures hashcode consistency, and includes a case with a nullcompatibleRange.To further enhance the test coverage, consider adding the following cases:
- Two
FlowNodeVersionInfoinstances that differ only in one property (e.g., onlysemveris different).- Comparison with null or a different object type.
- A case where all properties are the same except for
sporkId, which has the same content but is a different instance.These additional cases would provide more comprehensive coverage of the equality implementation and edge cases.
1-118: Overall: Well-implemented test suite for FlowNodeVersionInfo and FlowCompatibleRangeThis test file provides comprehensive coverage for the
FlowNodeVersionInfoandFlowCompatibleRangeclasses. The tests are well-structured and cover important aspects such as the builder pattern, static factory method, equality, and hashcode implementations.To further improve the test suite:
- Consider grouping related tests using nested classes or
@Nestedannotations for better organization.- Add parameterized tests for edge cases to reduce code duplication and increase test coverage.
- Implement property-based testing for more exhaustive coverage of possible inputs.
These improvements would enhance the maintainability and thoroughness of the test suite.
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImpl.kt (1)
344-361: LGTM with a minor suggestion for improved error handling.The implementation of
getNodeVersionInfolooks good and follows the established pattern in the class. It correctly processes the response and handles the optionalcompatibleRange.Consider enhancing the error message to include more details about the failure, similar to how it's done in some other methods of this class. For example:
FlowAccessApi.AccessApiCallResponse.Error("Failed to get node version info", e)This would provide more context for debugging purposes.
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (1)
465-503: Excellent addition of thegetNodeVersionInfotest!The new test method is comprehensive and well-structured, covering all relevant properties of the NodeVersionInfo, including the nested CompatibleRange. The assertions are thorough and use the appropriate methods for different data types.
A minor suggestion for improved readability:
Consider grouping related assertions together and adding comments to separate different sections of the test. For example:
// Assert main NodeVersionInfo properties assertEquals("v0.0.1", nodeVersionInfo.semver) assertEquals("123456", nodeVersionInfo.commit) assertArrayEquals("sporkId".toByteArray(), nodeVersionInfo.sporkId) assertEquals(5, nodeVersionInfo.protocolVersion) // Assert block heights assertEquals(1000L, nodeVersionInfo.sporkRootBlockHeight) assertEquals(1001L, nodeVersionInfo.nodeRootBlockHeight) // Assert CompatibleRange properties assertEquals(100L, nodeVersionInfo.compatibleRange?.startHeight) assertEquals(200L, nodeVersionInfo.compatibleRange?.endHeight)This grouping can make the test more readable and easier to maintain in the future.
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (2)
898-911: OverrideequalsandhashCodeinFlowExecutionReceiptMetaThe
FlowExecutionReceiptMetadata class does not overrideequalsandhashCode. If instances are used in collections or comparisons, it's important to ensure these methods are properly implemented.Consider adding the following implementations:
override fun equals(other: Any?): Boolean { if (this === other) return true if (other !is FlowExecutionReceiptMeta) return false if (executorId != other.executorId) return false if (resultId != other.resultId) return false if (spocks != other.spocks) return false if (executorSignature != other.executorSignature) return false return true } override fun hashCode(): Int { var result = executorId.hashCode() result = 31 * result + resultId.hashCode() result = 31 * result + spocks.hashCode() result = 31 * result + executorSignature.hashCode() return result }
Line range hint
1498-1502: Correct Typographical Error in Constructor ParameterThere's a typo in the constructor parameter name
jasonCadence. It should bejsonCadence.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
data class FlowEventPayload( override val bytes: ByteArray ) : Serializable, BytesHolder { - constructor(jasonCadence: Field<*>) : this(Flow.encodeJsonCadence(jasonCadence)) + constructor(jsonCadence: Field<*>) : this(Flow.encodeJsonCadence(jsonCadence))
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
.kotlin/errors/errors-1728577446477.logis excluded by!**/*.log.kotlin/errors/errors-1728582141255.logis excluded by!**/*.log.kotlin/errors/errors-1728834048981.logis excluded by!**/*.log.kotlin/errors/errors-1728837866707.logis excluded by!**/*.log
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- kotlin-example/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/examples/kotlin/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnector.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/FlowAccessApi.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImpl.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImpl.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (13 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (10 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (9 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowBlockHeaderTest.kt (1 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowBlockTest.kt (4 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowCollectionGuaranteeTest.kt (2 hunks)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowNodeVersionInfoTest.kt (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImplTest.kt
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowBlockHeaderTest.kt
- sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowBlockTest.kt
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (13)
kotlin-example/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/examples/kotlin/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnector.kt (3)
1-5: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name follows Kotlin naming conventions, and the imports are relevant to the class functionality.
6-8: LGTM: Class declaration and constructor are well-defined.The internal visibility modifier is appropriate for this utility class, and the constructor parameter is correctly marked as private and immutable.
1-14: Overall, well-implemented and follows Kotlin best practices.The
GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnectorclass is well-structured and serves its purpose effectively. It encapsulates the logic for retrieving node version information and handles both success and error cases appropriately. The code is concise and follows Kotlin best practices.Consider implementing the suggested custom exception for more explicit error handling. This would further improve the already solid implementation.
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowCollectionGuaranteeTest.kt (2)
10-10: Verify the necessity of using unsafe byte operations.The addition of
import com.google.protobuf.UnsafeByteOperationsintroduces the use of unsafe operations. While this can provide performance benefits, it may also lead to potential issues if not used carefully.Could you please confirm if using
UnsafeByteOperationsis necessary here? If so, ensure that proper safeguards are in place to prevent any potential issues.
45-50: LGTM! Constructor updated correctly.The
FlowCollectionGuaranteeconstructor has been properly updated to include the new fields:referenceBlockId,signature, andsignerIndices. This change ensures that the test covers the creation of aFlowCollectionGuaranteeobject with all the new fields.sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowNodeVersionInfoTest.kt (1)
12-32: LGTM: Comprehensive test for FlowNodeVersionInfo builderThe test thoroughly checks all properties of the
FlowNodeVersionInfoclass using its builder. The assertions are well-structured and cover each property individually, including the correct use ofassertArrayEqualsfor thesporkIdbyte array.sdk/build.gradle.kts (1)
35-35: LGTM! Ensure compatibility and address build issues.The update of the
org.onflow:flowdependency from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 aligns with the PR objectives to enhance the JVM SDK functionality. This minor version update should introduce new features or bug fixes while maintaining backward compatibility.To ensure a smooth integration:
- Review the changelog of the
org.onflow:flowlibrary for version 1.1.0 to understand the changes and new features.- Update the project's documentation to reflect this dependency update and any new features it enables.
- Run the entire test suite to verify that the update doesn't introduce any regressions.
Additionally, please address the build and test issues mentioned in the previous review:
- Ensure that
JAVA_HOMEis correctly set in the environment.- Verify that all instances of the
org.onflow:flowdependency version have been updated to 1.1.0 throughout the codebase.To verify the update and address the previous issues, please run the following script:
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImplTest.kt (3)
33-60: LGTM! Good additions for improved testing.The new
HEIGHTconstant andmockBlockHeaderare well-structured and comprehensive. They will enhance the readability and maintainability of the test code. ThemockBlockHeaderincludes all necessary properties, which will be useful for thorough testing of block header-related functionality.
Line range hint
80-195: Great refactoring to improve test consistency!The updates to use the new
mockBlockHeaderin multiple test methods (getLatestBlockHeader,getBlockHeaderById,getBlockHeaderByHeight,getLatestBlock,getBlockById,getBlockByHeight) significantly improve the consistency and reduce duplication in the test code. This refactoring enhances the maintainability of the tests and ensures that all block header-related tests use the same mock data.
Line range hint
1-654: Overall, excellent improvements to the AsyncFlowAccessApiImplTest!The changes in this file significantly enhance the quality and consistency of the test suite:
- The introduction of the
HEIGHTconstant andmockBlockHeaderimproves code reusability and maintainability.- Refactoring existing tests to use the
mockBlockHeaderreduces duplication and ensures consistency across block header-related tests.- The new
getNodeVersionInfotest method provides comprehensive coverage for the new functionality.These improvements will make the test suite more robust and easier to maintain in the future. Great job on enhancing the test code quality!
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImpl.kt (3)
591-615: LGTM! The newgetNodeVersionInfo()method is well-implemented.The implementation of
getNodeVersionInfo()is consistent with other methods in the class and follows best practices:
- It uses the
completableFuturewrapper for asynchronous execution.- Proper error handling is in place, both for API call failures and general exceptions.
- The response is correctly mapped to the
FlowNodeVersionInfodata class.- The method handles the optional
compatibleRangefield appropriately.
591-615: ThegetNodeVersionInfo()method is consistent with the class design.The implementation of
getNodeVersionInfo()follows the established patterns in theAsyncFlowAccessApiImplclass:
- It uses the
completableFuturewrapper for asynchronous execution.- Error handling is consistent with other methods.
- The response is mapped to a domain-specific object (
FlowNodeVersionInfo).- The method signature matches the interface declaration.
This consistency contributes to the maintainability and readability of the codebase.
591-615: Summary: The addition ofgetNodeVersionInfo()is a well-implemented and non-disruptive change.The new
getNodeVersionInfo()method:
- Extends the functionality of the
AsyncFlowAccessApiImplclass.- Is consistent with the existing code style and patterns.
- Handles errors appropriately.
- Does not introduce any breaking changes to the existing codebase.
Overall, this is a clean and valuable addition to the class.
...kotlin/org/onflow/examples/kotlin/getNodeVersionInfo/GetNodeVersionInfoAccessAPIConnector.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (8)
Line range hint
630-713: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for new properties.The changes to the
FlowBlockHeaderclass look good. The new properties and their corresponding updates in theofandbuildermethods are well-implemented and consistent. The addition of customequalsandhashCodemethods is a good practice for data classes with mutable properties like byte arrays.Consider adding KDoc comments for the new properties to improve code documentation and maintainability.
Line range hint
724-758: LGTM! Consider updating equals and hashCode methods.The changes to the
FlowBlockclass are well-implemented and consistent with the updates to theFlowBlockHeaderclass. The new properties and their corresponding updates in theofandbuildermethods look good.Consider updating the
equalsandhashCodemethods for theFlowBlockclass to include the new properties, similar to what was done forFlowBlockHeader. This ensures proper equality checks and hashing behavior for the updated class.
897-918: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the new class.The addition of the
FlowExecutionReceiptMetadata class is a good improvement, providing a structured way to represent execution receipt metadata. Theofcompanion object method andbuildermethod are well-implemented and consistent with other classes in the file.Consider adding KDoc comments for the
FlowExecutionReceiptMetaclass and its properties to improve code documentation and maintainability.
920-966: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the new class.The addition of the
FlowTimeoutCertificatedata class is a good improvement, providing a structured way to represent timeout certificates. Theofcompanion object method,buildermethod, and customequalsandhashCodemethods are well-implemented and consistent with other classes in the file.Consider adding KDoc comments for the
FlowTimeoutCertificateclass and its properties to improve code documentation and maintainability.
968-1007: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the new class.The addition of the
FlowQuorumCertificatedata class is a good improvement, providing a structured way to represent quorum certificates. Theofcompanion object method,buildermethod, and customequalsandhashCodemethods are well-implemented and consistent with other classes in the file.Consider adding KDoc comments for the
FlowQuorumCertificateclass and its properties to improve code documentation and maintainability.
1156-1200: LGTM! Consider updating class documentation.The changes to the
FlowCollectionGuaranteeclass are well-implemented and consistent with the updates to other classes. The new properties and their corresponding updates in theofandbuildermethods look good. The addition of customequalsandhashCodemethods is a good practice for data classes with mutable properties like byte arrays.Consider updating the class-level documentation for
FlowCollectionGuaranteeto reflect the new properties and their purpose in the collection guarantee representation.
1431-1434: LGTM! Consider adding validation and documentation.The addition of the
FlowCompatibleRangedata class is a good improvement, providing a clear structure for representing compatible block height ranges.Consider the following improvements:
- Add KDoc comments to explain the purpose and usage of this class.
- Implement a custom constructor with validation to ensure that
startHeightis less than or equal toendHeight.Example:
/** * Represents a range of compatible block heights. * * @property startHeight The starting block height of the compatible range. * @property endHeight The ending block height of the compatible range. */ data class FlowCompatibleRange( val startHeight: Long, val endHeight: Long ) : Serializable { init { require(startHeight <= endHeight) { "startHeight must be less than or equal to endHeight" } } }
1436-1504: LGTM! Consider adding documentation and improving null handling.The addition of the
FlowNodeVersionInfodata class is a valuable improvement, providing a structured way to represent detailed version information for Flow nodes. Theofcompanion object method,buildermethod, and customequalsandhashCodemethods are well-implemented and consistent with other classes in the file.Consider the following improvements:
- Add KDoc comments for the class and its properties to improve code documentation.
- In the
hashCodemethod, handle the case wherecompatibleRangeis null to avoid potentialNullPointerException.Example for the
hashCodemethod improvement:override fun hashCode(): Int { var result = semver.hashCode() result = 31 * result + commit.hashCode() result = 31 * result + sporkId.contentHashCode() result = 31 * result + protocolVersion.hashCode() result = 31 * result + sporkRootBlockHeight.hashCode() result = 31 * result + nodeRootBlockHeight.hashCode() result = 31 * result + (compatibleRange?.hashCode() ?: 0) return result }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (14 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (3)
788-800: LGTM! Builder method addition is consistent.The addition of the
buildermethod to theFlowChunkclass is a good improvement. It follows the pattern used in other classes and provides a convenient way to create protobuf messages fromFlowChunkinstances.
845-849: LGTM! Builder method addition is consistent.The addition of the
buildermethod to theFlowServiceEventclass is a good improvement. It follows the pattern used in other classes and provides a convenient way to create protobuf messages fromFlowServiceEventinstances.
880-895: LGTM! New methods enhance flexibility.The additions to the
FlowExecutionResultclass are well-implemented:
- The new
ofmethod overload allows creating instances fromExecutionResultOuterClass.ExecutionResult, enhancing flexibility.- The
buildermethod addition is consistent with other classes and provides a convenient way to create protobuf messages.These changes improve the usability and consistency of the
FlowExecutionResultclass.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (2)
Line range hint
724-742: Consider Nullability inFlowBlockFieldsProperties like
blockHeaderandprotocolStateIdinFlowBlockmight be null if not set in the protobuf. To prevent potentialNullPointerException, handle their nullability appropriately.Update the data class properties:
- val blockHeader: FlowBlockHeader, - val protocolStateId: FlowId + val blockHeader: FlowBlockHeader?, + val protocolStateId: FlowId?Modify the
ofmethod:- blockHeader = FlowBlockHeader.of(value.blockHeader), - protocolStateId = FlowId.of(value.protocolStateId.toByteArray()) + blockHeader = if (value.hasBlockHeader()) FlowBlockHeader.of(value.blockHeader) else null, + protocolStateId = if (value.protocolStateId.isEmpty) null else FlowId.of(value.protocolStateId.toByteArray())Adjust the
buildermethod:- .setBlockHeader(blockHeader.builder().build()) - .setProtocolStateId(protocolStateId.byteStringValue) + blockHeader?.let { builder.setBlockHeader(it.builder().build()) } + protocolStateId?.let { builder.setProtocolStateId(it.byteStringValue) }
897-902: Nitpick: Remove Unnecessary Trailing CommaThe trailing comma after the last parameter in
FlowExecutionReceiptMetacan be removed for cleaner code.Apply this diff:
data class FlowExecutionReceiptMeta( val executorId: FlowId, val resultId: FlowId, val spocks: List<ByteArray>, - val executorSignature: FlowSignature, + val executorSignature: FlowSignature )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (13 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt (10)
196-203: [Skip]: Previous comment still valid regarding lazy initialization.The suggestion to lazily initialize the
encodedproperty inFlowAccountKeywas previously mentioned and remains applicable.
317-323: Efficient Filtering ingetEventsOfTypeMethodThe filtering logic for events based on the type is correctly implemented.
459-464: OptimizedsignerMapImplementation Looks GoodThe use of
associatewithwithIndex()efficiently maps signers to their indices.
788-800:FlowChunkBuilder Method Implemented CorrectlyThe builder method accurately sets all required fields, ensuring proper serialization.
845-849:FlowServiceEventBuilder Method is CorrectFields
typeandpayloadare appropriately set usingByteString.copyFrom.
881-887: [Skip]: Previous comment about duplicateofmethods is still validThe suggestion to refactor the duplicate
ofmethods inFlowExecutionResultremains applicable.
920-966:FlowTimeoutCertificateImplementation is AccurateAll properties are correctly mapped and the methods are properly implemented, including
equalsandhashCode.
968-1007:FlowQuorumCertificateClass is Well-DefinedThe class correctly encapsulates the necessary properties and provides accurate mappings.
1156-1200:FlowCollectionGuaranteeUpdates Look GoodNew properties are added, and the serialization/deserialization methods correctly handle them.
1431-1460: [Skip]: Previous comment on validation inFlowCompatibleRangeis still validThe recommendation to add validation or default values to
FlowCompatibleRangeremains applicable.
Closes: #107
Description
Setup classes to model protobuf objects:
FlowNodeVersionInfoFlowCompatibleRangeThe JVM SDK currently does not support the Access API endpoint:
PR to update protobuf files: onflow/flow#1516
To-do:
org.onflow:flow:1.0.0"as protobuf fields have changed since then: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.onflow/flowgetNodeVersionInfo+ update docsFor contributor use:
masterbranchFiles changedin the Github PR explorerSummary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Tests
Chores
.gitignorefile to exclude specific error files.