-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 442
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support the labeled/unlabeled actions on pull_request events #17373
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
||
def pull_request_unlabeled? | ||
github_pull_request_unlabeled? | ||
end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All of this will barf it it's gitlab. And what about gitea?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, all the other methods use different naming scheme.
- reopened_pull_request?
- pull_request_unlabeled?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nothing breaks for gitlab. The code to execute label
filter just does not execute.
I will address the naming convention change you mentioned
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are still using a different naming scheme...
d22144f
to
f2db237
Compare
f2db237
to
2d6fe04
Compare
7cad0cc
to
20ce90a
Compare
No description provided.