Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #1500 from ryandesign/typo
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Fix typos in README
  • Loading branch information
linas authored Apr 23, 2024
2 parents bdf8971 + 07a8418 commit 783b117
Showing 1 changed file with 6 additions and 6 deletions.
12 changes: 6 additions & 6 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ and `tests.py` runs unit tests.

- macOS:
* Due to file permissions settings, macOS users may need to install
python bindindings into custom directory locations. This can be
python bindings into custom directory locations. This can be
done by saying
`make install pythondir=/where/to/install`

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ d matches h or nothing. This is a new feature in version 5.1.0
(August 2014). The website provides additional documentation.

Although the English-language link-grammar links are un-oriented,
it seems that a defacto direction can be given to them that is
it seems that a de facto direction can be given to them that is
completely consistent with standard conceptions of a dependency
grammar.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ below is an actual working example, already implemented in the current
LG English dictionary. *All* link crossings can be implemented in this
way! So we do not have to actually abandon the current parsing
algorithms to get non-planar diagrams. We don't even have to modify them!
Hurrahh!
Hurrah!

Here is a working example: "I want to look at and listen to everything."
This wants two `J` links pointing to 'everything'. The desired diagram
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@ for details.

The foundational LG papers make comments to this effect; however, see
also work by Bob Coecke on category theory and grammar. Coecke's
diagramatic approach is essentially identical to the diagrams given in
diagrammatic approach is essentially identical to the diagrams given in
the foundational LG papers; it becomes abundantly clear that the
category theoretic approach is equivalent to Link Grammar. See, for
example, this introductory sketch
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ Some complex phantom constructions:
* If this is true, then (you should) do it.
* Perhaps he will (do it), if he sees enough of her.

See also [github issue #224](https://github.com/opencog/link-grammar/issues/224).
See also [GitHub issue #224](https://github.com/opencog/link-grammar/issues/224).

Actual ellipsis:
* At first, it seemed like ...
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1573,7 +1573,7 @@ http://www.corpus.bham.ac.uk/publications/index.shtml
only... but also ...) which have a long-range structure similar to
quoted text (he said ...).

See also [github issue #42](https://github.com/opencog/link-grammar/issues/42).
See also [GitHub issue #42](https://github.com/opencog/link-grammar/issues/42).

### Semantification of the dictionary:
"to be fishing": Link grammar offers four parses of "I was fishing for
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 783b117

Please sign in to comment.