-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
173 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
173 changes: 173 additions & 0 deletions
173
feature/qos/otg_tests/egress_traffic_prioritize_mpls_exp_test/README.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ | ||
# DP-2.5: QoS Prioritization of Eggress Traffic | ||
|
||
## Summary | ||
|
||
The scope of this test is limited to supporting the prioritization of egress traffic only. Traffic coming from ATE-1 to DUT is classified based on the EXP bits of the MPLS label. Classifiers can match on the EXP bits of the inner MPLS header which supports all 8 values (EXP is a 3-bit field). Packets arriving on the DUT are expected to be MPLSoGRE where the EXP value are mapped from the DSCP value of the inner IP header according to this table. | ||
|
||
Traffic Class# | Inner DSCP ranges marked by the Customer | MPLS EXP bits | ||
-------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ------------- | ||
TC1 | 000xxx | 001 | ||
TC2 | 001xxx | 010 | ||
TC3 | 010xxx | 011 | ||
TC4 | 011xxx | 100 | ||
TC5 | 100xxx | 101 | ||
TC6 | 11xxxx | 110 | ||
|
||
Egress Traffic: | ||
Traffic coming from ATE-1 to the DUT is encapsulated in MPLS over GRE. The DUT matches the EXP bits and, based on the policy and matched EXP bits, assigns the traffic to a specific traffic class. | ||
Ingress Traffic: | ||
Traffic coming from ATE-2 to the DUT is plane IPv4. The DUT matches the Destination IP and, based on the policy and matched DSCP value, assigns the traffic to a specific traffic class. | ||
|
||
## Topology | ||
|
||
``` | ||
+------------+ +-------------+ +--------------+ | ||
| ATE-1 | | | | ATE-2 | | ||
| | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | | ||
|.-------. | | | | .-------. | | ||
( pfx1 ) | . | | p2 : : p2 | ( pfx2 ) | | ||
|`-------' | p1 ; : p1 | DUT +-------+-+--------+ .-------. | | ||
| |----+-+-----| |------------------| | | ||
| | | | | +-------+-+--------+ | | ||
| | | | | | p3 : | | : p3 | | | ||
| | : ; | | | | | | | ||
| | ' | | ' | | | ||
| | LAG_1 | | LAG_2 | | | ||
+------------+ +-------------+ +--------------+ | ||
``` | ||
|
||
## Baseline setup | ||
|
||
* Connect ATE-1 port-1 to DUT ports 1(100G), and ATE-2 ports 2 through 3 to DUT ports 2-3(10G). | ||
* Configure ATE-1 and DUT ports 1 to be part of a LAG_1. | ||
* Configure ATE-2 and DUT ports 2-3 to be part of a LAG_2. | ||
* Configure policy-map to decap traffic from ATE-1 to ATE-2. | ||
* Configure policy-map to encap traffic from ATE-2 to ATE-1. | ||
* Enable QoS on Ingress and Egress of aggregate interface with QoS policy. | ||
* Configure ATE MPLSoGRE flow for different traffic-class (TC0 to TC7) with mpls exp bits. | ||
|
||
|
||
## Procedure | ||
|
||
At the start of each of the following scenarios, ensure: | ||
|
||
* All ports are up and baseline is reset as above. | ||
* Push baseline config to DUT and ATE | ||
|
||
Set the inner DSCP value to 26 for all traffic flows. | ||
Set the inner TTL value to 64 for all traffic flows. | ||
|
||
On outer header set mpls exp bit for different traffic class as follows: | ||
Traffic-Class: MPLS EXP Bit | ||
default:0, TC1:1, TC2:2, TC3:3, TC4:4, TC5:5, TC6:6, TC7:7 | ||
|
||
### Test-1 | ||
|
||
No changes in DSCP marking and TTL when policy is applied to bundle interface | ||
|
||
* Apply policy number 3.4 | ||
* Generate MPLSoGRE Traffic as below: | ||
TC1:TC2:TC3:TC4:TC5:TC6:TC7:Default = 2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps | ||
* Capture the traffic on ATE-2 port and Verify the Inner packet doesn't change DSCP and TTL Value. | ||
* Verify traffic distribution as per egress policy 3.4 applied on dut LAG_2 port as follows: | ||
TC1: 1Gbps, TC2: 1Gbps, TC3: 2Gbps, TC3: 2Gbps, TC4: 2Gbps, TC5: 2Gbps, TC6: 2Gbps, TC7: 2Gbps, Default: 1Gbps. | ||
|
||
### Test-2 | ||
|
||
No changing in behavior of ingress traffic | ||
|
||
* Apply policy number 3.4 | ||
* Generate Egress MPLSoGRE Traffic and Ingress traffic with plane IPv4 as below: | ||
Egress Traffic Flows: | ||
TC1:TC2:TC3:TC4:TC5:TC6:TC7:Default = 2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps:2Gbps | ||
Ingress Traffic: | ||
Flow: 4Gbps | ||
* Verify Ingress Traffic has no packet drop. | ||
* Verify traffic distribution as per egress policy 3.4 applied on dut LAG_2 port as follows: | ||
TC1: 1Gbps, TC2: 1Gbps, TC3: 2Gbps, TC3: 2Gbps, TC4: 2Gbps, TC5: 2Gbps, TC6: 2Gbps, TC7: 2Gbps, Default: 1Gbps. | ||
|
||
|
||
### Test-3 | ||
|
||
Verify shaper can enforce maximum transmit rate | ||
|
||
* Apply policy number 3.4 | ||
* Generate Egress MPLSoGRE Traffic and Ingress traffic with plane IPv4 as below: | ||
Egress Traffic Flows: | ||
TC1:TC2:TC3:TC4:TC5:TC6:TC7:Default = 5Gbps:5Gbps:5Gbps:5Gbps:5Gbps:5Gbps:5Gbps:5Gbps | ||
* Verify traffic distribution as per egress policy 3.4 applied on dut LAG_2 port as follows: | ||
TC1: 1Gbps, TC2: 1Gbps, TC3: 2Gbps, TC4: 3Gbps, TC5: 3Gbps, TC6: 4Gbps, TC7: 5Gbps, Default: 1Gbps. | ||
|
||
|
||
### Test-4 | ||
|
||
LLQ without shaping | ||
|
||
* Apply policy number 5.6 | ||
* Generate Egress MPLSoGRE Traffic: | ||
Egress Traffic Flows: TC1 sends 80% of bandwidth, default queue, TC2-TC7 each send 20% of bandwidth | ||
TC1:TC2:TC3:TC4:TC5:TC6:TC7:Default = 16Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps | ||
* Verify traffic distribution as per egress policy 5.6 applied on dut LAG_2 port as follows: | ||
TC1: 16Gbps, TC2: 0.4Gbps, TC3: 0.6Gbps, TC4: 0.6Gbps, TC5: 0.6Gbps, TC6: 0.8Gbps, TC7: 0.8Gbps, Default: 0.2Gbps | ||
|
||
### Test-5 | ||
|
||
LLQ with shaping | ||
|
||
* Apply policy number 5.7 | ||
* Generate Egress MPLSoGRE Traffic: | ||
Egress Traffic Flows: TC1 sends 80% of bandwidth, default queue, TC2-TC7 each send 20% of bandwidth | ||
TC1:TC2:TC3:TC4:TC5:TC6:TC7:Default = 16Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps | ||
* Verify traffic distribution as per egress policy 5.7 applied on dut LAG_2 port as follows: | ||
TC1: 2Gbps, TC2: 0.4Gbps, TC3: 0.6Gbps, TC4: 0.6Gbps, TC5: 0.6Gbps, TC6: 0.8Gbps, TC7: 0.8Gbps, Default: 0.2Gbps | ||
### Test-6 | ||
|
||
Min bandwidth reservation | ||
|
||
* Apply policy number 6.1 | ||
* Generate Egress MPLSoGRE Traffic: | ||
Egress Traffic Flows: TC1 sends 80% of bandwidth, default queue, TC2-TC7 each send 20% of bandwidth | ||
TC1:TC2:TC3:TC4:TC5:TC6:TC7:Default = 4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps:4Gbps | ||
* Verify traffic distribution as per egress policy 6.1 applied on dut LAG_2 port as follows: | ||
TC1: 2Gbps, TC2: 0.4Gbps, TC3: 0.6Gbps, TC4: 0.6Gbps, TC5: 0.6Gbps, TC6: 0.8Gbps, TC7: 0.8Gbps, Default: 0.2Gbps | ||
|
||
|
||
### Test-7 | ||
|
||
Priority queue | ||
|
||
* Apply policy number 7.1 | ||
* Generate Egress MPLSoGRE Traffic: | ||
Egress Traffic Flows: TC1 sends 80% of bandwidth, default queue, TC2-TC7 each send 20% of bandwidth | ||
TC1:TC2:TC3:TC4:TC5:TC6:TC7:Default = 6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps | ||
* Verify traffic distribution as per egress policy 7.1 applied on dut LAG_2 port as follows: | ||
TC1-TC3: 0, TC4: 2Gbps, TC5-TC7: 6Gbps, Default: 0 | ||
|
||
### Test-8 | ||
|
||
Equal Priority queue | ||
|
||
* Apply policy number 7.1 | ||
* Generate Egress MPLSoGRE Traffic: | ||
Egress Traffic Flows: TC1 sends 80% of bandwidth, default queue, TC2-TC7 each send 20% of bandwidth | ||
TC1:TC2:TC3:TC4:TC5:TC6:TC7:Default = 6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps:6Gbps | ||
* Verify traffic distribution as per egress policy 7.1 applied on dut LAG_2 port as follows: | ||
TC1-TC7: 2.85Gbps, Default: 0 | ||
|
||
## Telemetry Parameter Coverage | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## OpenConfig Path and RPC Coverage | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
rpcs: | ||
gnmi: | ||
gNMI.Get: | ||
gribi: | ||
``` | ||
## Config parameter coverage |