chore(docs): Recommend use of multi-cloud gateway for object storage #59
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Chris Butler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Butler <[email protected]>
… headings test is not markdown hierarchy aware Signed-off-by: Chris Butler <[email protected]>
… headings test is not markdown hierarchy aware Signed-off-by: Chris Butler <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In this proposal, are we considering the need to support simple deployment and demos as well i.e. Minio is good to show a simple flow including what is happening on storage side for the data, model, etc... ? I'd almost consider that having both minio and Nooba / MCG could make sense. Feel free to comment and elaborate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe I didn't make it as clear as I could. MCG can replicate the functionality of minio - e.g using in cluster storage to build object storage pool.
Some of the stripped back minio manifests are simpler, however, when you have the operator included I believe it's as complex.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My question was simpler: does this still provide us with a simple user interface to access and interact with the storage objects? (typically needed in a demo)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay this is definitely a gap then. Looks the console was removed: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_data_foundation/4.11/html/4.11_release_notes/removed_functionality
I'll have a bit of a look at options for demos.
Top level ADR on using MCG. Feedback required.
Signed-off-by: Chris Butler [email protected]