-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue with page: build_a_course.rst #783 #798
Merged
jswope00
merged 12 commits into
openedx:main
from
Apgomeznext:Apgomeznext/educators_documentation_review_23
Jan 23, 2025
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
df31ba6
fix issue #783
Apgomeznext 9b1e2af
fix commit
Apgomeznext f8c4bb1
fix commit
Apgomeznext 68c53a1
Update build_a_course.rst
Apgomeznext 0d66a2f
Update add_units.rst
Apgomeznext 2e41d06
Delete create_course.txt
Apgomeznext 2ed15ee
Create create_course.txt
Apgomeznext 22c2794
add_units_delete
Apgomeznext 3e27503
error fix
Apgomeznext 8d837fb
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into Apgomeznext/educato…
Apgomeznext d033565
Update create_edit_publish_unit.rst
Apgomeznext 1448909
Update create_edit_publish_unit.rst
Apgomeznext File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
21 changes: 16 additions & 5 deletions
21
source/educators/how-tos/course_development/create_edit_publish_unit.rst
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Apgomeznext This leads to a strange scenario where add_units is a clip of a larger file, and its seealso refers to itself as part of the larger file.
To me, that is difficult to follow and to understand for any new person looking at docs. And I'm not sure why it is necessary overall. I'd propose deleting add_units.rst entirely.