fix: RTL for the upgrade notification list

[ihor-romaniuk]

Description:

This pull request contains minor fixes for RTL display of the upgrade notification list.

Screenshots before:

LTR	RTL

Screenshots after:

LTR	RTL

Related Pull Requests:

PR to the open-release/palm.master branch: #1221
PR to the open-release/quince.master branch: #1228

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @ihor-romaniuk! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (7c92110) 88.19% compared to head (4405640) 88.23%.
Report is 40 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1220      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.19%   88.23%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         271      271              
  Lines        4591     4591              
  Branches     1151     1151              
==========================================
+ Hits         4049     4051       +2     
+ Misses        528      526       -2     
  Partials       14       14              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[itsjeyd]

Hi @ihor-romaniuk, thank you for this contribution!

I'm assuming that the changes are ready for review, but let me know if you were planning on working on them some more.

--

@mattcarter This PR, as well as the corresponding backports to Palm (#1221) and Quince (#1228), are ready for Aurora to have a look.

[ihor-romaniuk]

Hi @itsjeyd, this PR is ready for review, thanks.

[itsjeyd]

Hey @mattcarter, a friendly reminder to line this PR up for engineering review. Backports for Palm (#1221) and Quince (#1228) are ready to go as well.

[itsjeyd]

This is just a small fix and I doubt that it needs to go through the full product review cycle. (That's why I didn't add the product review label when I first triaged the changes.) Removing product review label now.

[itsjeyd]

Calling all CCs for frontend-app-learning:

@brian-smith-tcril
@arbrandes
@viktorrusakov
@BbrSofiane

Would you have bandwidth for reviewing and merging this PR?

(Even if you don't, it would be great if you could comment below and state that. Otherwise it's hard to know if there's a need to keep looking for reviewers. Thanks for your help!)

[openedx-webhooks]

@ihor-romaniuk 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.