support for output var assignment in op execution #190
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rface so that NAR.py can also utilize them
… capability using var binding in ops
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TODO: find solution for python API. By something like
*outputstdin op_id
whereby when say
<({SELF} * ((1 * 2) * #1)) --> ^add>
is executed "^add executed with args ((1 * 2) * #1))"
it then makes a stdin request to obtain
((1 * 2) * 3))
then parsing it, and obatining the substitution map {#1 -> #3) from there.
With this feature the idea will also work without touching C code when used from Python.
Also adapt NAR_numerics.py accordingly.