Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: OpenID4VP common OCA UI #1392

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MosCD3
Copy link
Contributor

@MosCD3 MosCD3 commented Jan 13, 2025

Work in Progress

Updating OpenID4VP to use common UI components and OCA for proof presentation

Screenshots, videos, or gifs

Replace this text with embedded media for UI changes if they are included in this PR. If there are none, simply enter N/A

Breaking change guide

Replace this text with any breaking changes included in this PR along with how to address them in downstream projects. If there are none, simply enter N/A

Related Issues

Replace this text with issue #'s that are relevant to this PR. If there are none, simply enter N/A

Pull Request Checklist

Tick all boxes below to demonstrate that you have completed the respective task. If the item does not apply to your this PR check it anyway to make it apparent that there's nothing to do.

  • All commits contain a DCO Signed-off-by line (we use the DCO GitHub app to enforce this)
  • If applicable, screenshots, gifs, or video are included for UI changes
  • If applicable, breaking changes are described above along with how to address them
  • Updated documentation as needed for changed code and new or modified features
  • Added sufficient tests so that overall code coverage is not reduced

If you have any questions to any of the points above, just submit and ask! This checklist is here to help you, not to deter you from contributing!

Pro Tip 🤓

  • Read our contribution guide at least once; it will save you a few review cycles!
  • Your PR will likely not be reviewed until all the above boxes are checked and all automated checks have passed

@MosCD3 MosCD3 marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2025 14:07
@MosCD3 MosCD3 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 21, 2025 14:07
Copy link
Contributor

@bryce-mcmath bryce-mcmath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like this is still a work in progress but if possible could we fix the linting, testing, and sonarcloud issues and leave out the change to the Podfile.lock?

@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ EXTERNAL SOURCES:
SPEC CHECKSUMS:
anoncreds: 045f191123bb20d7dcdc2f7c19df57ae30c427f6
aries-askar: 3a78d5cfc8faedbfc55a9ff35e2309fc4574a147
boost: 7dcd2de282d72e344012f7d6564d024930a6a440
boost: 57d2868c099736d80fcd648bf211b4431e51a558
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure where this change came from or if it was meant to be included, but usually if the Podfile.lock gets changed the overall checksum should change as well. Probably best to just not include it since it doesn't seem related to the PR and no other dependencies have been changed

Signed-off-by: Mostafa Gamal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mostafa Gamal <[email protected]>
@jleach jleach marked this pull request as draft January 28, 2025 16:11
Signed-off-by: Mostafa Gamal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mostafa Gamal <[email protected]>
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants