Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BE-682 | Set isBestEffort when there are no orderbooks in the system to process #609

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: v28.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

deividaspetraitis
Copy link
Collaborator

@deividaspetraitis deividaspetraitis commented Jan 30, 2025

Sets best effort flag for active-orders when there are no orderbooks in the system ingested yet that may indicate issues with no data incoming from the Node.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced system behavior when no orderbooks are available
    • Improved handling of orderbook processing scenarios
  • Documentation

    • Updated changelog to reflect new system handling approach for orderbook processing

Sets best effort flag for active-orders when there are no orderbooks in
the system ingested yet that may indicate issues with no data incoming
from the Node.
@deividaspetraitis deividaspetraitis self-assigned this Jan 30, 2025
@deividaspetraitis deividaspetraitis changed the title BE-682 | Set isBestEffort on error processing orderbook active orders BE-682 | Set isBestEffort when there are no orderbooks in the system to process Jan 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@deividaspetraitis has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a799c8 and 952d75e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • orderbook/usecase/orderbook_usecase.go (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a modification to the GetActiveOrders method in the orderbook use case, specifically handling scenarios where no orderbooks are available. When the orderbooks slice is empty, the method now returns a nil order slice, sets the isBestEffort flag to true, and returns a nil error. This change ensures that the absence of orderbooks is treated as a non-error condition, allowing the system to gracefully handle scenarios with no orderbook data.

Changes

File Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added entry for issue #609 about setting isBestEffort when no orderbooks are available; Updated entry for issue #608 to clarify isBestEffort flag during error processing
orderbook/usecase/orderbook_usecase.go Modified GetActiveOrders method to return early with nil orders and isBestEffort=true when no orderbooks exist

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • p0mvn

Poem

🐰 In the realm of orderbooks sparse,
Where data might seem to parse,
We set our flag with gentle care,
Best effort mode beyond compare!
No errors thrown, just smooth transit,
A rabbit's code, perfectly placid! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants