-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
📊 marriages&divorces: add ONS data on people ever married by age #3869
Conversation
a626846
to
5fc4e1e
Compare
Quick links (staging server):
Login: chart-diff: ✅
data-diff: ❌ Found differences= Dataset garden/ons/2025-01-12/divorces
= Table divorces
~ Column cumulative_percentage (changed metadata)
- - - producer: Office for National Statistics
+ + - producer: UK Office for National Statistics
? +++
- - Office for National Statistics (ONS), released22 February 2024, ONS website, dataset, Divorces in England and Wales, UK. Retrieved 12 January 2025.
+ + Office for National Statistics (ONS), released 22 February 2024, ONS website, dataset, Divorces in England and Wales, UK. Retrieved 12 January 2025.
? +
- - attribution_short: ONS
+ + attribution_short: UK ONS
? +++
+ Dataset garden/ons/2025-01-21/marriages
+ + Table marriages
+ + Column cumulative_percentage_per_100
Legend: +New ~Modified -Removed =Identical Details
Hint: Run this locally with etl diff REMOTE data/ --include yourdataset --verbose --snippet Automatically updated datasets matching weekly_wildfires|excess_mortality|covid|fluid|flunet|country_profile|garden/ihme_gbd/2019/gbd_risk are not included Edited: 2025-01-24 09:05:44 UTC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really interesting data! :-) The code and charts look great. I just pointed out a few minor things in the code, feel free to disregard them. Regarding the charts:
- In divorces, you can remove the "The " at the beginning. And there's a typo: "anniversy".
- In marriages, I think the "(x-axis)" may not be necessary, and possibly neither the "(from 17 to 50 years)", since that's clear when looking at the chart.
71ecfeb
to
52b4681
Compare
No description provided.