Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: P4ADEV-1936-WF-TreasuryOpiIngestion-TreasuryOpiIngestionActivity-add-output-fields #87

Conversation

macacia
Copy link
Collaborator

@macacia macacia commented Jan 20, 2025

Description

List of Changes

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Pre-Deploy Test
    • Unit
    • Integration (Narrow)
  • Post-Deploy Test
    • Isolated Microservice
    • Broader Integration
    • Acceptance
    • Performance & Load

Types of changes

  • PATCH - Bug fix (backwards compatible bug fixes)
  • MINOR - New feature (add functionality in a backwards compatible manner)
  • MAJOR - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

… into P4ADEV-1936-WF-TreasuryOpiIngestion-TreasuryOpiIngestionActivity-add-output-fields

# Conflicts:
#	version
… into P4ADEV-1936-WF-TreasuryOpiIngestion-TreasuryOpiIngestionActivity-add-output-fields

# Conflicts:
#	version
…ion-TreasuryOpiIngestionActivity-add-output-fields' into P4ADEV-1936-WF-TreasuryOpiIngestion-TreasuryOpiIngestionActivity-add-output-fields
@macacia macacia marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2025 16:35
@macacia macacia merged commit f708605 into main Jan 20, 2025
11 checks passed
@macacia macacia deleted the P4ADEV-1936-WF-TreasuryOpiIngestion-TreasuryOpiIngestionActivity-add-output-fields branch January 20, 2025 16:54
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.38.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants