Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix(pn-12958): fix regression of ApiIntegration Component #1403

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

leleOFA
Copy link
Contributor

@leleOFA leleOFA commented Nov 12, 2024

Short description

insert a new state in virtual key table, the choice to insert the chip in fe was made based on the fact that in bff every time the state of a public changes, a call is made to the virtuals which would in turn call the publics again. all this was done to continue working and managing the virtual ones even if there are no active public ones

when change public in not active does one call to api
when create or rotate public called virtual and check issuer api

List of changes proposed in this pull request

  • insert chip when public key is not active
  • insert banner when public is not active

How to test

when public is not active the virtual keys with status Active change into Disabled with new color chip

@ZorbaDimatteo
Copy link
Contributor

@leleOFA cambia il titolo della pr seguendo conventional commit, ad esempio "fix(PN-xxxx): fix this bug"

@leleOFA leleOFA changed the title Fixed regression on pn 12958 Fix(pn-12958): fix regression of ApiIntegration Component Nov 12, 2024
@AndreaCimini90 AndreaCimini90 self-assigned this Nov 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@AndreaCimini90 AndreaCimini90 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To test this pr I need all the combination and what I should see. Can you list all the cases in the pr description? Check with maurizio and alessandro.

@leleOFA leleOFA marked this pull request as draft December 10, 2024 15:51
@leleOFA leleOFA marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2024 10:39
@AndreaCimini90 AndreaCimini90 self-requested a review December 17, 2024 07:56
@AndreaCimini90 AndreaCimini90 self-requested a review December 18, 2024 15:19
AndreaCimini90
AndreaCimini90 previously approved these changes Jan 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@AndreaCimini90 AndreaCimini90 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before merging, the conversation with design team must be closed

@AndreaCimini90 AndreaCimini90 self-requested a review January 9, 2025 08:10
@AndreaCimini90 AndreaCimini90 merged commit 48e8d55 into develop Jan 9, 2025
5 checks passed
@AndreaCimini90 AndreaCimini90 deleted the fix/PN-12958 branch January 9, 2025 08:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants