Cosmetics: acknowledging Heidelberg in the PN Footer #158
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed that the PE footer includes Heidelberg in its list of
![Screenshot 2023-09-22 at 2 39 04 PM](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/61889129/270040578-f13c37dc-5d50-46f9-9f48-821afde2ac9c.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.LGVnvVc6G41mzw1WAmynjkotFhoCahIprq5i3xP1zPQ)
Produced by
:(this is controlled by sosol/app/views/cross_site/_footer.html.erb)
But the same is not true across PN. I've therefore added the relevant line of html to the various files in
papyri/navigator/pn-site
where it is missing, on the assumption that its omission is simply an oversight.