-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 775
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
approval-voting: Make importing of duplicate assignment idempotent #6971
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
24f8fdd
Fix importing of duplicate assingmnents
alexggh 443309f
Fix import duplicate on restart
alexggh 4e2788b
Minor fixes
alexggh a49f7e0
Update polkadot/node/core/approval-voting/src/persisted_entries.rs
alexggh fd9c784
Merge branch 'master' into alexggh/fix_reimport_of_duplicate
alexggh 1a18e57
Remove redundant checks
alexggh 8d610ce
Add prdoc
alexggh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not getting the !is_duplicate part. Can you give me your line of reasoning here, that would help I think. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We keep the assignments in two places in
assigned_validators: Bitfield,
andtranches: Vec<TrancheEntry>
, so when we call this function we already know if we saw an assignment for this validator which is really rare case. Given that this is on the hot-path I want to prevent running this iteration if it is not truly needed which is where !is_duplicate helps.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this deserves a comment in the code as it's not obvious how is_duplicate is different from the iter check
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Discussed with @ordian this and we convinced ourselves that iterating on
duplicates
is actually superfluous, so I removed that part.