-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: badly formatted html #455
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request include an update to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant PeanutProvider
User->>App: Request layout
App->>PeanutProvider: Render with context
PeanutProvider-->>App: Provide context
App-->>User: Display layout
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- src/app/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/app/layout.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ | |||
.pnp.js | |||
.vscode | |||
**.patch | |||
public/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reconsider ignoring the entire public/
directory
Adding public/
to .gitignore
will exclude all static assets in this directory from version control. This is generally not recommended for Next.js projects as it can lead to several issues:
- Collaboration difficulties: Team members won't have access to shared static assets.
- Deployment complications: Ensuring all necessary public files are included in deployments may become challenging.
- Risk of losing track of important static files.
Consider the following alternatives:
-
If the intent is to ignore specific files within
public/
, use more targeted ignore patterns. For example:public/*.log public/temp/
-
If there are large binary files in
public/
that shouldn't be in Git, consider using Git LFS (Large File Storage) instead of ignoring them completely. -
If you still decide to ignore
public/
, ensure you have a robust process for managing and deploying these assets outside of version control.
Could you please clarify the reasoning behind this change? This will help in determining the best approach for your specific use case.
No description provided.