[TASK-6125] Feat: Peanut Wallet #464
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. 🗂️ Base branches to auto review (5)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces multiple changes across various files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
src/components/Setup/Setup.tsx (2)
1-3: Consider importing specific constants for better tree-shaking.While using a namespace import for constants is valid, importing specific constants could lead to better tree-shaking and potentially smaller bundle sizes.
Consider refactoring the import statement to:
import { INIT_VIEW_STATE, ISetupViewState, SETUP_VIEW_MAP } from './Setup.consts'This change would allow you to use these constants directly without the
_constsprefix throughout the component.
6-6: Consider using or removing the unusedsetStepfunction.The
setStepfunction from useState is currently not used in the component.If
setStepis intended for future use, consider adding a TODO comment explaining its future purpose. Otherwise, you can simplify the state declaration:const [step] = useState<_consts.ISetupViewState>(_consts.INIT_VIEW_STATE)This change would make it clear that the state is read-only in the current implementation.
src/components/index.ts (1)
20-20: LGTM! Consider reordering exports for consistency.The addition of the
Setupcomponent export is appropriate and aligns with the file's purpose. It's great to see the new functionality being integrated into the existing structure.For better maintainability, consider reordering the exports alphabetically. This would place the
Setupexport betweenRefundandTerms:export * from './Register' export * from './Request' +export * from './Setup' export * from './Terms' export * from './Welcome' -export * from './Setup'src/app/setup/page.tsx (2)
1-4: Consider more specific imports for components.While the current imports are functional, importing all components from '@/components' might lead to unnecessary imports and potentially impact bundle size. Consider importing only the specific components you need, especially if the '@/components' directory contains many components.
For example, you could replace:
import * as components from '@/components'with:
import { Setup } from '@/components'This change would make the code more explicit about which components are being used and potentially improve performance.
6-21: Consider more specific metadata for improved SEO.The metadata configuration is well-structured and follows Next.js best practices. However, the title "Peanut Protocol" and description "Text Tokens" are quite generic and may not provide enough context for search engines or users.
Consider updating the title and description to be more specific to the setup page. For example:
export const metadata: Metadata = { title: 'Setup Your Account | Peanut Protocol', description: 'Set up your account on Peanut Protocol for secure token transactions.', // ... rest of the metadata }This change would provide more context about the page's purpose and potentially improve SEO.
src/components/Setup/Setup.consts.ts (2)
1-1: Consider using explicit imports instead of wildcard import.While wildcard imports can be convenient, they may lead to naming conflicts and make it harder to track which specific components are being used. Consider importing only the necessary components explicitly for better maintainability and clarity.
Example of explicit imports:
import { HandleSetupView } from './Views';
10-13: LGTM: Well-defined interface for setup view state. Consider renaming 'idx' property.The
ISetupViewStateinterface clearly defines the structure for the setup view state. However, the 'idx' property name could be more descriptive.Consider renaming 'idx' to something more descriptive, such as 'stepIndex' or 'currentStepIndex', to improve code readability.
src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.view.tsx (4)
99-121: Add error handling inhandleRegisterto catch potential exceptionsThe
handleRegisterfunction performs asynchronous operations that may fail. Wrapping the logic in atry...catchblock will handle errors gracefully and provide feedback to the user.Apply this diff to enhance error handling:
const handleRegister = async () => { + try { setIsRegistering(true) const webAuthnKey = await toWebAuthnKey({ passkeyName: username, passkeyServerUrl: PASSKEY_SERVER_URL as string, mode: WebAuthnMode.Register, passkeyServerHeaders: {}, }) const passkeyValidator = await toPasskeyValidator(publicClient, { webAuthnKey, entryPoint, kernelVersion: KERNEL_V3_1, validatorContractVersion: PasskeyValidatorContractVersion.V0_0_2 }) await createAccountAndClient(passkeyValidator) window.alert('Register done. Try sending UserOps.') + } catch (error) { + console.error('Registration failed:', error) + window.alert('Registration failed. Please try again.') + } finally { setIsRegistering(false) + } }
122-146: Add error handling inhandleLoginto catch potential exceptionsSimilar to
handleRegister, thehandleLoginfunction should have error handling to manage potential failures during asynchronous operations.Apply this diff to enhance error handling:
const handleLogin = async () => { + try { setIsLoggingIn(true) const webAuthnKey = await toWebAuthnKey({ passkeyName: username, passkeyServerUrl: PASSKEY_SERVER_URL as string, mode: WebAuthnMode.Login, passkeyServerHeaders: {} }) const passkeyValidator = await toPasskeyValidator(publicClient, { webAuthnKey, entryPoint, kernelVersion: KERNEL_V3_1, validatorContractVersion: PasskeyValidatorContractVersion.V0_0_2 }) validator = passkeyValidator console.log(validator) await createAccountAndClient(passkeyValidator) window.alert('Login done. Try sending UserOps.') + } catch (error) { + console.error('Login failed:', error) + window.alert('Login failed. Please try again.') + } finally { setIsLoggingIn(false) + } }
35-38: Clean up commented-out code to improve maintainabilityThere are several blocks of commented-out code that can be removed to make the codebase cleaner and easier to maintain.
Consider removing these commented sections to enhance readability.
Also applies to: 57-59, 257-288
45-46: Modularize code by separating logic into appropriate filesThe TODO comment suggests breaking the logic into separate files. Modularizing the code will enhance maintainability and readability.
Consider organizing functions and components into separate modules based on their functionality.
src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (1)
564-783: Remove large blocks of commented-out code to improve readabilityThe code contains a substantial amount of commented-out code within the
sendTransactionsfunction. This can make the code harder to read and maintain. Consider removing this code or moving it to a separate branch or file if it's needed for future development.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- src/app/setup/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Setup/Setup.consts.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/Setup/Setup.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Setup/Views/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/Setup/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/index.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/components/Setup/Views/index.ts
- src/components/Setup/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/components/Setup/Setup.tsx
[error] 5-5: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.view.tsx
[error] 47-47: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
[error] 419-419: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/components/Setup/Setup.tsx (1)
1-12: Overall assessment: Good foundation with room for improvementThe
Setupcomponent provides a flexible structure for rendering different setup steps dynamically. However, there are several areas where the code could be enhanced:
- Import specific constants instead of using namespace imports.
- Improve prop handling and typing.
- Address the unused
setStepfunction.- Enhance type safety and readability in the rendering logic.
Implementing these suggestions will lead to a more robust, maintainable, and type-safe component. Great job on creating a flexible setup structure!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 5-5: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
src/app/setup/page.tsx (1)
23-32: Clarify component purpose and consider error handling.The SetupPage component is well-structured, but there are a few points to consider:
The comment suggests this page might be for testing purposes. It's important to clarify the intended use of this component. If it's not for production, consider adding a more explicit comment or moving it to a dedicated testing directory.
There's no visible error handling or loading state management. Consider implementing these for a more robust user experience.
To verify the usage of this component and its potential testing nature, you could run:
This will help determine if SetupPage is used elsewhere in the project and if there are dedicated test files for it.
Consider adding error boundaries and loading states:
import { ErrorBoundary } from 'react-error-boundary' import { Suspense } from 'react' export default function SetupPage() { return ( <ErrorBoundary fallback={<ErrorComponent />}> <Suspense fallback={<LoadingComponent />}> <Layout> <components.Setup /> </Layout> </Suspense> </ErrorBoundary> ) }This change would improve the robustness of the component, handling potential errors and providing a loading state.
src/components/Setup/Setup.consts.ts (3)
3-8: LGTM: Well-defined enum for setup process stages.The
SetupViewsTypeenum clearly defines the stages of the setup process and follows TypeScript naming conventions.
15-25: LGTM: Well-defined constants for initial state and setup flow.The
INIT_VIEW_STATEandSETUP_VIEW_FLOWconstants are well-defined and clearly represent the initial state and the order of views in the setup process, respectively. The consistency betweenSETUP_VIEW_FLOWand theSetupViewsTypeenum is commendable.
27-32:⚠️ Potential issueImplement or map the correct components for each view type.
The
SETUP_VIEW_MAPconstant is well-structured, but it currently maps all view types to the same component (HandleSetupView). This seems inconsistent with the purpose of having different view types and could lead to confusion or errors.If this is not a placeholder implementation, please update the mapping to use the correct components for each view type. If it is a placeholder, consider adding a TODO comment to indicate that this needs to be updated in the future.
Let's verify if there are other view components defined:
package.json (5)
34-34: LGTM: Addition of @zerodev/passkey-validator.The addition of this dependency aligns with the PR objectives for implementing passkey functionality. The version
^5.4.2allows for compatible updates, which is a good practice.
35-35: LGTM: Addition of @zerodev/sdk.The addition of the ZeroDev SDK is essential for implementing the new features mentioned in the PR objectives. The version
^5.3.20allows for compatible updates, which is appropriate for this type of dependency.
99-99: LGTM: Addition of tslib as a dev dependency.The addition of
tslibas a dev dependency with version^2.7.0is appropriate. This library contains TypeScript helper functions and is commonly used in TypeScript projects. Its inclusion as a dev dependency is correct, as it's typically needed during development and build time.
36-36: Verify stability of @zerodev/waas.The addition of this dependency aligns with the PR objectives for implementing wallet functionality. However, the version
^0.2.2suggests it might be a relatively new or potentially unstable library.Please ensure that this version is stable and compatible with the other ZeroDev packages being used. Consider running the following script to check for any known issues or incompatibilities:
34-36: Summary of package.json changes.The additions to
package.jsonalign well with the PR objectives:
- ZeroDev SDK components (
@zerodev/passkey-validator,@zerodev/sdk,@zerodev/waas) have been added to support new account management and blockchain interaction features.- The
tslibdev dependency has been added, indicating proper TypeScript support.These changes suggest a significant enhancement in the project's capabilities, particularly in user account management and blockchain interactions. The use of caret (^) for versioning allows for compatible updates, which is a good practice.
However, please note the following:
- Ensure that the relatively new
@zerodev/waaspackage (version 0.2.2) is stable and compatible with your project requirements.- Consider documenting these new dependencies and their purposes in the project's documentation to help future developers understand the project structure.
To ensure all new dependencies are properly installed and don't cause any conflicts, please run the following script:
Also applies to: 99-99
src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (1)
31-54: Imports added correctly for ZeroDev SDK and ViemThe necessary imports for ZeroDev SDK, Viem, and related libraries have been added appropriately.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/context/walletContext.tsx (3)
38-39: Check response status before parsing JSONWhen fetching
tokenAddressResponse, it's advisable to check if the response is OK before parsing the JSON. This helps prevent runtime errors if the response is not successful.Apply this diff to add a response check:
const tokenAddressResponse = await fetch('/api/peanut/user/get-decoded-token') + if (!tokenAddressResponse.ok) { + console.warn('Failed to fetch decoded token.') + return null + } const { address: tokenAddress } = await tokenAddressResponse.json()
94-95: Use specific type instead ofanyforupdatedUserDataUsing
anybypasses TypeScript's type safety. Consider defining an appropriate interface or type forupdatedUserDatato enhance type safety and code maintainability.Example:
- const updatedUserData: any = await response.json() + interface UpdatedUserData { + success: boolean + // add other relevant properties here + } + const updatedUserData: UpdatedUserData = await response.json()
22-27: Address the pending TODO comment in the documentationThere's a
// TODO: change descriptioncomment indicating that the description needs updating. Please provide an accurate description for theWalletProvidercomponent to enhance code readability and maintenance.Would you like assistance in drafting an updated description?
src/context/authContext.tsx (3)
34-35: Implement address retrieval fromWalletContextThe TODO comments indicate that the
addressshould be fetched fromWalletContextrather than usinguseAccount(). Updating the code to utilizeWalletContextwill ensure that all components reference the same address source, promoting consistency across the application.Would you like assistance in implementing this change or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
Line range hint
54-58: Re-evaluate user logout logic when wallet address changesIn the
fetchUserfunction, if theaddressandtokenAddressdo not match, the user is set tonull, effectively logging out the user when the wallet address changes. Since changing wallets does not necessarily change the user, consider revising this logic to maintain the user state across wallet changes.
Line range hint
261-266: Review the necessity of fetching the user when the wallet address changesThe comments suggest that fetching the user when the wallet address changes may not be necessary since connecting another wallet doesn't change the user. Consider removing or adjusting the
useEffecthook that depends onaddressto prevent unnecessary user fetches.Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary
useEffecthook:- // this doesn't make sense - // when we connect another wallet, we don't change the user at all - useEffect(() => { - const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => { - fetchUser() - }, 500) - - return () => clearTimeout(timeoutId) - }, [address])
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/context/authContext.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/context/contextProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/context/walletContext.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/context/contextProvider.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM: New import statement for WalletProvider.The import statement for
WalletProvideris correctly added and necessary for the changes in the component structure.src/context/walletContext.tsx (1)
31-31:⚠️ Potential issueConfirm necessity before removing
userstate declarationThe
// TODO: removecomment suggests removing theuserstate declaration. However,userandsetUserare used throughout the component, particularly in the context provider'svalue. Removing this state may cause errors. Please verify whether theuserstate is still needed before removing it.src/context/authContext.tsx (1)
Line range hint
143-157: Ensure all calls toaddAccountaccommodate the newbridgeAccountIdparameterThe
addAccountfunction signature has been updated to include an optionalbridgeAccountIdparameter. Please verify that all calls toaddAccountacross the codebase have been updated accordingly to pass thebridgeAccountIdwhere necessary.Run the following script to identify all usages of
addAccount:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/interfaces/wallet.interfaces.ts (1)
2-5: Consider adding JSDoc comments and clarifying the BYOW acronym.To improve code documentation and clarity:
- Add a JSDoc comment for the
WalletTypeenum to explain its purpose.- Consider adding a comment to clarify what
BYOWstands for.Here's a suggested implementation:
/** * Represents the types of wallets supported in the application. */ export enum WalletType { /** Peanut wallet type */ PEANUT = 'PEANUT', /** Bring Your Own Wallet type */ BYOW = 'BYOW' }src/constants/index.ts (1)
6-6: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the ZeroDev constants export aligns well with the PR objectives and supports the new wallet functionality.
Consider adding a brief comment above this line to explain the purpose of these constants, e.g.:
// ZeroDev SDK configuration constants export * from './zerodev.consts'This would improve code readability and make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose of these constants at a glance.
src/constants/zerodev.consts.ts (3)
5-9: LGTM: ZeroDev SDK constants are well-defined.The constants are correctly defined using environment variables, following Next.js naming conventions. The comments provide useful context and documentation reference.
Consider adding default values or error handling for cases where environment variables might be undefined:
export const BUNDLER_URL = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_ZERO_DEV_BUNDLER_URL ?? throw new Error('NEXT_PUBLIC_ZERO_DEV_BUNDLER_URL is not defined')Repeat this pattern for PAYMASTER_URL and PASSKEY_SERVER_URL.
11-13: LGTM: ZeroDev WaaS constant is well-defined.The ZERO_DEV_PROJECT_ID constant is correctly defined using an environment variable, following Next.js naming conventions. The comments provide useful context and documentation reference.
Consider adding a default value or error handling for cases where the environment variable might be undefined:
export const ZERO_DEV_PROJECT_ID = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_ZERO_DEV_PASSKEY_PROJECT_ID ?? throw new Error('NEXT_PUBLIC_ZERO_DEV_PASSKEY_PROJECT_ID is not defined')
16-17: LGTM: Additional constants are well-defined, but consider future flexibility.The PEANUT_WALLET_CHAIN and USER_OP_ENTRY_POINT constants are correctly defined using imported values.
Consider the following for future scalability:
PEANUT_WALLET_CHAIN: If there's a possibility of supporting multiple chains in the future, consider making this configurable or using an array of supported chains.
USER_OP_ENTRY_POINT: The current setup uses a specific version (V07). Ensure there's a process in place to update this constant when new versions are released.
Example for multi-chain support:
export const SUPPORTED_CHAINS = [arbitrum, /* other chains */] export const DEFAULT_CHAIN = arbitrumsrc/context/authContext.tsx (2)
34-35: Implement fetchingaddressfromwalletContextThe TODO comments indicate that the
addressshould be fetched fromwalletContextinstead of usinguseAccount(). Implementing this change would ensure consistency across components, as all mentions of the wallet would pull from the same source.Would you like assistance in implementing this? I can help provide the necessary code changes or open a GitHub issue to track this task.
37-37: Add the missing handle functionalityThe TODO comment suggests that a handle needs to be added. Please implement this functionality to complete the feature.
Would you like assistance in implementing this? I can help provide the necessary code changes or open a GitHub issue to track this task.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- src/constants/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/constants/zerodev.consts.ts (1 hunks)
- src/context/authContext.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/context/walletContext/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/interfaces/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/interfaces/wallet.interfaces.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/context/walletContext/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/interfaces/index.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM! New export enhances module interface.The addition of
export * from './wallet.interfaces'correctly expands the available exports for this module. This change aligns well with the existing code structure and enhances the module's functionality.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any naming conflicts or unexpected side effects, let's verify the usage:
This script will help us identify any potential issues arising from the new export.
src/interfaces/wallet.interfaces.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM! Well-structured enum implementation.The
WalletTypeenum is well-defined and follows TypeScript best practices. It provides a clear way to distinguish between different wallet types in the application.src/constants/zerodev.consts.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate for the defined constants.The imports from 'viem/chains' and 'permissionless' are relevant to the constants being defined in this file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (3)
11-11: Consider addressing or removing the TODO commentThere's a TODO comment about moving something to "context consts". If this task is still relevant, consider creating a separate issue to track it. If it's no longer applicable, you may want to remove the comment to keep the code clean.
19-27: Consider removing or implementing the commented-out codeThe
addAccountmethod is commented out in theWalletContextTypeinterface. If this functionality is not needed, consider removing the commented code to improve readability. If it's planned for future implementation, consider adding a TODO comment explaining the plan or create a separate issue to track this feature.
1-139: Address remaining TODOs and improve implementation completenessThere are several TODO comments and incomplete implementations throughout the file. Consider the following improvements:
- Address all TODO comments, either by implementing the suggested changes or by creating separate issues to track them.
- Implement the
deactiveWalletOnLogoutfunction or remove it if it's not needed.- Ensure all functions have proper error handling and return types.
- Consider adding more comprehensive documentation for the
WalletProvidercomponent and its methods.- Review the use of
anytypes (if any) and replace them with more specific types where possible.By addressing these points, you'll improve the overall completeness and robustness of the wallet context implementation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/context/contextProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/context/walletContext/zeroDevContext.context.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/context/walletContext/zeroDevContext.context.tsx (3)
1-7: LGTM: Imports and 'use client' directive are correctly implemented.The 'use client' directive and imports are appropriately placed and relevant to the component's functionality.
10-10: LGTM: Component declaration is well-structured.The
ZeroDevPeanutProvidercomponent is correctly declared as a named export with appropriate prop typing.
12-26: LGTM with a suggestion: Consider safer project ID handling.The implementation of
ZeroDevPeanutProvideris well-structured and correctly uses the ZeroDev SDK. However, there's a potential improvement in how the project ID is handled.Consider replacing the non-null assertion operator (!) with a safer approach:
projectIds: { [consts.PEANUT_WALLET_CHAIN.id]: consts.ZERO_DEV_PROJECT_ID || '' }This change ensures that an empty string is used if
ZERO_DEV_PROJECT_IDis undefined, preventing potential runtime errors.To ensure
ZERO_DEV_PROJECT_IDis properly defined, you can run the following check:If the constant is not found or is undefined, consider adding appropriate error handling or default values.
src/context/contextProvider.tsx (2)
4-5: LGTM: New imports for enhanced wallet functionality.The addition of
WalletProviderandZeroDevPeanutProviderimports aligns with the described changes in the context provider hierarchy. These new providers will enable better management of wallet-related state and ZeroDev functionalities.
10-16: Approved: Enhanced context provider hierarchy.The restructured context provider hierarchy improves the application's state management:
ZeroDevPeanutProvideras the outermost provider enables ZeroDev functionalities throughout the app.WalletProviderwrapping the existing providers ensures wallet context is available to all child components.- Existing
TokenContextProviderandLoadingStateContextProviderare properly nested within the new structure.This change successfully addresses the previous review comment regarding the provider hierarchy.
To ensure full integration and functionality, please address the TODO comments mentioned in the previous review:
src/context/walletContext.tsx: Lines 22, 30-31src/context/authContext.tsx: Lines 34-35src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (1)
11-11: Evaluate the necessity of moving interfaces to context constsThere are TODO comments about moving the
WalletContextTypeandActiveWalletinterfaces to "context consts". Consider whether this refactoring is necessary. If it would improve the code organization, create a separate issue to track this task. If not, you may want to remove these TODO comments.Also applies to: 30-30
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.waas.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Setup/Views/index.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/Setup/Views/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.waas.view.tsx
[error] 21-21: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
[error] 180-180: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.provider.view.tsx (2)
86-91: Remove commented-out code for better maintainabilityThe
useEffecthooks in lines 86-91 and 93-99 are commented out. If they are not needed, consider removing them to keep the codebase clean.Also applies to: 93-99
46-46: Address the TODO: Organize logic into appropriate filesThe TODO comment indicates that the logic should be broken into appropriate files. Organizing code enhances readability and maintainability.
Would you like assistance in refactoring the code to separate logic into dedicated modules or components?
src/context/walletContext/zeroDevContext.context.tsx (3)
24-24: Address the TODO: Move constants to context constantsThere's a TODO comment suggesting moving certain constants to context-specific constants for better organization.
Would you like assistance in refactoring and organizing the constants into a dedicated context constants file?
58-59: Address the TODOs: Remove unused imports and order importsThe TODO comments indicate that imports need to be cleaned up and organized.
I can help identify unused imports and reorder them according to best practices for improved code clarity.
133-136: Implement the logout functionalityThere's a TODO comment about handling logout, but it's not yet implemented.
Would you like help in implementing the logout functionality? This could involve resetting the
kernelClient, updatingisKernelClientReady, and clearing any user-specific data.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.provider.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Setup/Views/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/context/contextProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/context/walletContext/zeroDevContext.context.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/Setup/Views/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.provider.view.tsx
[error] 48-48: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
[error] 201-201: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/context/contextProvider.tsx (2)
4-5: LGTM: New provider imports.The addition of
WalletProviderandZeroDevProviderimports aligns with the PR objective of implementing the Peanut Wallet feature.
10-16: LGTM: Improved provider hierarchy.The new structure with
ZeroDevProvideras the outermost provider, followed byWalletProvider, is a logical organization. This ensures that wallet and authentication contexts are available to all child components, which aligns well with the Peanut Wallet feature implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.provider.view.tsx (2)
46-46: Address TODO comment for code organizationThe TODO comment suggests breaking the logic into appropriate files. This is a good practice for maintaining a clean and modular codebase. Consider creating separate files for different logical parts of this component, such as:
- A file for API calls and data fetching
- A file for utility functions
- A file for type definitions and constants
This will improve the overall structure and maintainability of the code.
Would you like assistance in creating a plan for breaking down this file into smaller, more focused components and utility files?
1-197: Overall assessment and suggestions for improvementThe
HandleSetupViewcomponent successfully implements a user interface for ZeroDev account abstraction functionalities, including user registration, login, and sending user operations. While the core functionality is in place, there are several areas where the component could be improved:
- Error Handling: Implement more robust error handling throughout the component, especially for asynchronous operations.
- User Feedback: Enhance user feedback mechanisms, particularly for the results of user operations and registration/login processes.
- Code Organization: As mentioned in the TODO comment, consider breaking down this component into smaller, more focused components and utility files.
- Type Safety: Implement proper TypeScript types for props, state, and function parameters to improve code reliability.
- Accessibility: Ensure that the UI elements are accessible, including proper ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation.
To improve the overall architecture and maintainability of this component:
- Create a separate file for API calls and data fetching logic.
- Move utility functions and constants to separate files.
- Consider creating smaller, reusable components for common UI elements like buttons and input fields.
- Implement a custom hook for managing the form state and validation.
These changes will make the code more modular, easier to test, and simpler to maintain as the application grows.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 48-48: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
[error] 187-187: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.provider.view.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.provider.view.tsx
[error] 48-48: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
[error] 187-187: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.provider.view.tsx (2)
4-31: Consider organizing imports and logic into separate filesThe TODO comment suggests breaking down the logic, and the large number of imports indicates this file might be doing too much. Consider:
- Moving ZeroDev initialization logic to a separate service
- Creating a dedicated hook for user operation handling
- Extracting the Spinner component to a shared components folder
This would improve maintainability and reusability.
Also applies to: 49-49
73-75: Remove or enhance debug loggingThe console.log statement in useEffect should be removed or replaced with proper logging for production. Consider using a logging service or environment-based conditional logging.
- useEffect(() => { - console.log({isKernelClientReady}) - }, [isKernelClientReady]); + useEffect(() => { + if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { + console.log('Kernel client ready status:', isKernelClientReady) + } + }, [isKernelClientReady]);src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (1)
53-53: Implement ExposingactiveWalletto the AppThere's a TODO indicating that
activeWalletshould be exposed for the app to consume, instead of usingconst { address } = useAccount()in multiple places. Implementing this change will centralize wallet information, improving consistency and maintainability across the application.Would you like assistance in refactoring the app to use
activeWalletthroughout? I can help generate the necessary changes or open a new GitHub issue to track this task.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.provider.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/components/Setup/Views/Handle.provider.view.tsx
[error] 51-51: Unexpected empty object pattern.
(lint/correctness/noEmptyPattern)
[error] 237-237: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (2)
57-57: Ensure 'activeWallet' is consumed by app componentsThe comment at line 57 indicates that
activeWalletshould be exposed for the app to consume instead of usingconst { address } = useAccount()directly. Ensure that all components useuseWalletto accessactiveWalletfor consistency.
69-69: Remove unused 'username' state variableThe
usernamestate variable is declared but not used in the code. If it's not needed, consider removing it to keep the codebase clean.Apply this diff to remove the unused state:
-const [username, setUsername] = useState<string>('')
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (1)
693-707: Improve error handling and extract magic numbersThe transaction confirmation retry logic uses magic numbers and could have more specific error handling.
Consider these improvements:
+ const MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS = 3; + const RETRY_DELAY_MS = 500; + - for (let attempt = 0; attempt < 3; attempt++) { + for (let attempt = 0; attempt < MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS; attempt++) { try { await waitForTransactionReceipt(config, { confirmations: 4, hash: hash, chainId: Number(selectedChainID), }) break } catch (error) { - if (attempt < 2) { + if (attempt < MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS - 1) { - await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 500)) + await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, RETRY_DELAY_MS)) } else { + if (error instanceof TransactionError) { + console.error('Transaction failed:', error.message) + } else { console.error('Failed to wait for transaction receipt after 3 attempts', error) + } } } }src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (3)
12-13: Address the TODO comments regarding imports and constantsThere are TODO comments indicating the need to remove unused imports and to move certain items to context constants. Addressing these will improve code cleanliness and maintainability.
Would you like assistance in identifying unused imports or refactoring the constants?
64-70: Unused state variableusernameThe
usernamestate variable is declared but not used anywhere in the code. Consider removing it if it's unnecessary, or implement its usage if it's planned for future development.
80-86: Remove the unuseduseEffecthookThe
useEffecthook starting at line 80 is marked with a TODO to be removed. If it's no longer needed, please remove it to clean up the code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (1)
31-56: LGTM: New imports and state management for ZeroDev integrationThe additions properly set up the required dependencies and state management for the ZeroDev SDK integration.
Also applies to: 77-78
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/context/walletContext/zeroDevContext.context.tsx (2)
69-70: Address the TODOs regarding import statementsConsider removing any unused imports and organizing the import statements to enhance code readability and maintainability. Properly ordered imports follow the project's coding standards and make the codebase cleaner.
Would you like assistance in organizing and cleaning up the import statements?
200-200: Enhance documentation with detailed docstringsImproving the docstrings for your user operation functions will increase code understandability and assist other developers in using and maintaining the code. Comprehensive documentation is a best practice in collaborative projects.
Would you like help in drafting detailed docstrings for these functions?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/context/walletContext/zeroDevContext.context.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/context/walletContext/zeroDevContext.context.tsx
[error] 44-44: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 210-210: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
Line range hint
208-307: Consider splitting the component for better maintainability.The component handles multiple responsibilities and could benefit from being split into smaller, focused components:
- TransactionConfirmation (handling the core transaction logic)
- AttachmentDisplay (handling file and message attachments)
- TransactionCosts (handling network costs and points display)
This would improve:
- Code maintainability
- Testing capabilities
- Reusability
Example structure:
// Components/Create/Link/Confirm/ // - TransactionConfirmation.tsx // - AttachmentDisplay.tsx // - TransactionCosts.tsx // - index.tsx (main component)src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (1)
Line range hint
840-847: Add proper type definitions for transaction types.The TODO comment indicates a need for type definitions. Consider creating an enum or union type for transaction types to improve type safety:
type TransactionType = 'deposit' | 'gasless'; interface TransactionResponse { type: TransactionType; response: any; // Define specific types for each transaction type linkDetails: peanutInterfaces.IPeanutLinkDetails; password: string; feeOptions?: any; // Define specific fee options type usdValue?: string; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx (2)
Line range hint
13-13: Remove unused wagmi import.Since we've migrated to using
useWalletfor address management, theuseAccountimport from wagmi is no longer used.-import { useAccount } from 'wagmi'Let's verify if useAccount is still needed elsewhere in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Search for useAccount usage rg "useAccount" --type ts --type tsxAlso applies to: 19-19, 66-67
Line range hint
70-159: Verify transaction safety with new wallet integration.The handleConfirm function uses the wallet address in several critical operations:
- Link initialization
- Transaction signing
- Direct transfers
- Local storage updates
Please ensure that:
- The new wallet context properly handles address state changes
- Transaction signing permissions are correctly requested
- Error states are properly propagated from the wallet context
Let's verify the wallet context implementation:
src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (2)
31-56: LGTM! Well-organized imports for blockchain interaction.The new imports are logically grouped and necessary for the wallet integration features.
573-669: Previous review comment about commented code is still valid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/context/walletContext/zeroDevContext.context.tsx (2)
5-24: Consider organizing imports systematicallyThe imports could be better organized into logical groups:
- React and core dependencies
- Project-specific imports (@/interfaces, @/constants)
- External dependencies (viem, zerodev, permissionless)
Consider organizing imports like this:
// Core React imports import { ReactNode, createContext, useContext, useState} from 'react' // Project imports import * as interfaces from '@/interfaces' import * as consts from '@/constants/zerodev.consts' // External dependencies import { http, createPublicClient, encodeFunctionData, Abi } from "viem" import { createKernelAccount, createKernelAccountClient, createZeroDevPaymasterClient, KernelAccountClient } from "@zerodev/sdk" // ... rest of the importsAlso applies to: 69-70
106-106: Remove or wrap console.log statementsDevelopment logs should be removed or wrapped in a development check.
Consider using a debug utility:
const debug = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' ? console.log : () => {}Then replace console.log calls with debug:
- console.log({passkeyValidator}) + debug({passkeyValidator})Also applies to: 115-115, 137-137, 263-272, 298-298
src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
94-98: Improve transaction flow documentation.While the added comments provide valuable context, consider these improvements:
- The TODO comment should specify the action item for creating the transaction type enum
- The comments could be formatted as JSDoc for better IDE integration and readability
Consider this format:
- // TODO: create typing enum for transactionType - // this flow is followed for paying-gas txs, paying-gas userops AND - // gasless userops (what would be gasless as a tax) via Input.view.tsx which - // makes userops 'not-gasless' in the sense that we don't want - // Peanut's BE to make it gasless. The paymaster will make it by default - // once submitted, but as far as this flow is concerned, the userop is 'not-gasless' + /** TODO: Create TransactionType enum to replace string literals + * Transaction flow: + * 1. Paying-gas transactions: Regular transactions where user pays gas + * 2. Paying-gas userops: User operations where user pays gas + * 3. Gasless userops: Transactions marked as 'not-gasless' to prevent Peanut BE handling, + * but made gasless by the paymaster during submission + */src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx (3)
16-17: Optimize imports for better bundle size.Consider importing only the required functions from ethers instead of the entire library to reduce bundle size.
-import * as ethers from 'ethers' +import { Contract } from 'ethers'
74-75: Consider using a more descriptive variable name.The variable name
isActiveWalletPWis not immediately clear. Consider renaming it to something more descriptive likeisPasswordWalletActiveorhasActivePasswordWalletto better convey its purpose.
115-117: Enhance comment documentation for gasless deposit logic.The current comment about PW userops could be more detailed. Consider expanding it to explain:
- What PW userops are
- How the paymaster makes them gasless
- Why this check is necessary for security
src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (1)
748-748: Add context to the TODO comment.The TODO comment "this needs its own type" lacks specific details about what type is needed and why. Consider adding more context to help future developers understand the requirement.
-// TODO: this needs its own type +// TODO: Create a discriminated union type for deposit/gasless transaction responses to improve type safety
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx (5 hunks)
- src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (5 hunks)
- src/context/walletContext/zeroDevContext.context.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/context/walletContext/zeroDevContext.context.tsx
[error] 44-44: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 210-210: Don't use 'BigInt' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'bigint' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
19-19: LGTM: Import aligns with Peanut Wallet integration.The addition of the useWallet hook import is consistent with the PR's objective of introducing Peanut Wallet functionality.
src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx (1)
Line range hint
82-116: Verify transaction security measures.Please ensure the following security measures are in place:
- Validate token amounts to prevent integer overflow
- Sanitize and validate recipient addresses
- Add rate limiting for gasless transactions
- Consider adding transaction amount limits
src/components/Create/useCreateLink.tsx (2)
581-592: Implement retry logic for PW wallet transactions.The PW wallet implementation lacks the retry logic that exists in the BYOW implementation. This inconsistency could lead to different transaction reliability between wallet types.
31-56: Review security implications of ZeroDev SDK integration.The integration of ZeroDev SDK for account abstraction and passkey validation requires careful consideration of security aspects:
- Ensure the SDK versions are pinned to specific versions in package.json
- Verify that the WebAuthn implementation follows security best practices
- Consider the trust implications of using external bundler and paymaster services
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the dependencies and their versions.
These scripts will help us:
- Find the actual dependency versions
- Understand the scope of ZeroDev SDK usage
- Verify WebAuthn implementation patterns
- Check bundler and paymaster configurations
Let me try one more search with modified parameters to find the ZeroDev dependencies and bundler configurations:
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
ZeroDev SDK integration appears secure with proper implementation patterns
The verification reveals:
Dependencies are properly pinned in package.json:
- @zerodev/sdk: ^5.3.20
- @zerodev/passkey-validator: ^5.4.2
- @zerodev/waas: ^0.2.2
WebAuthn implementation follows security best practices:
- Consistent usage of
toWebAuthnKeywith proper parameters- Appropriate mode selection (Register/Login)
- Server URL configuration through environment variables
Bundler and paymaster configurations are properly implemented:
- Paymaster client creation with appropriate chain and transport settings
- Proper usage of bundler actions with entry point validation
- User operation receipt verification in place
The integration appears to follow ZeroDev's recommended security patterns and best practices for account abstraction implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if SDK versions are pinned grep -A 5 '"dependencies"' package.json | grep -E "@zerodev/(sdk|passkey-validator)"Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for package.json files in the repository fd package.json --type f --exec cat {} \; | grep -A 10 '"dependencies":'Length of output: 514
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for ZeroDev SDK usage patterns in the codebase rg -l "@zerodev" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check WebAuthn implementation patterns ast-grep --pattern 'toWebAuthnKey($_)'Length of output: 2329
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for bundler and paymaster configurations rg -A 5 "createZeroDevPaymasterClient|bundlerActions" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all package.json files and their content find . -name package.json -type f -exec cat {} \;Length of output: 3508
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for bundler and paymaster configurations with file extension fix rg -A 5 "createZeroDevPaymasterClient|bundlerActions" --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}'Length of output: 8357
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for ZeroDev imports with file extension fix rg -A 5 "@zerodev" --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}'Length of output: 5378
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (2)
70-81: Move implementation details to documentationThe large comment block about username integration contains important implementation details that should be moved to proper documentation or API docs, rather than being kept as inline comments.
Consider creating a separate documentation file or updating the JSDoc comments to include this information in a more structured way.
257-266: Implement removeBYOW function or mark as not implementedThe
removeBYOWfunction contains multiple TODOs without implementation. This could lead to incomplete wallet removal functionality in production.Would you like me to help implement this function based on the TODO comments? I can provide a complete implementation that handles:
- API call for wallet removal
- Local wallet list update
- Provider disconnection
- Active wallet state management
src/app/(mobile-ui)/home/page.tsx (2)
35-41: Remove commented-out mock data.This mock data appears to be no longer needed since real wallet data is being used.
- // const wallets = [ - // { amount: '$40.00', username: 'kkonrad', email: '[email protected]' }, - // { amount: '$55.00', username: 'alice123', email: '[email protected]' }, - // { amount: '$30.00', username: 'bob456', email: '[email protected]' }, - // { amount: '$70.00', username: 'charlie789', email: '[email protected]' }, - // { amount: '$25.00', username: 'david101', email: '[email protected]' }, - // ]
23-24: Consider moving error strings to walletContext.The TODO comment raises a valid architectural question. Error handling should be centralized in the wallet context for better maintainability and reusability.
Would you like assistance in implementing this refactor?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/app/(mobile-ui)/home/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/app/(mobile-ui)/home/page.tsx
[error] 135-199: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
src/context/walletContext/walletContext.tsx
[error] 236-254: This code is unreachable
... because this statement will return from the function beforehand
(lint/correctness/noUnreachable)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/app/(mobile-ui)/home/page.tsx (2)
23-24: Consider moving error handling to WalletContext.The TODO comment suggests moving error strings to the wallet context. This would be a good architectural improvement as it centralizes error handling logic and makes it reusable across components.
Would you like me to help implement this refactor?
35-41: Remove commented-out mock data.The commented-out mock wallet data should be removed as it's no longer needed and adds unnecessary noise to the codebase.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/app/(mobile-ui)/home/page.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/app/(mobile-ui)/home/page.tsx
[error] 135-199: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
…feat/peanut-wallet-zero-dev
Currently adds:
This PR was open for a long time, thus, many outdated comments. |
Currently adds:
This PR was open for a long time, thus, many outdated comments.